information overload

[Universe Prince]

http://www.slate.com/id/2244198/pagenum/all

A respected Swiss scientist, Conrad Gessner, might have been the first to raise the alarm about the effects of information overload. In a landmark book, he described how the modern world overwhelmed people with data and that this overabundance was both "confusing and harmful" to the mind. The media now echo his concerns with reports on the unprecedented risks of living in an "always on" digital environment. It's worth noting that Gessner, for his part, never once used e-mail and was completely ignorant about computers. That's not because he was a technophobe but because he died in 1565. His warnings referred to the seemingly unmanageable flood of information unleashed by the printing press. [...] Gessner's anxieties over psychological strain arose when he set about the task of compiling an index of every available book in the 16th century, eventually published as the Bibliotheca universalis. Similar concerns arose in the 18th century, when newspapers became more common. The French statesman Malesherbes railed against the fashion for getting news from the printed page, arguing that it socially isolated readers and detracted from the spiritually uplifting group practice of getting news from the pulpit. A hundred years later, as literacy became essential and schools were widely introduced, the curmudgeons turned against education for being unnatural and a risk to mental health. An 1883 article in the weekly medical journal the Sanitarian argued that schools "exhaust the children's brains and nervous systems with complex and multiple studies, and ruin their bodies by protracted imprisonment." Meanwhile, excessive study was considered a leading cause of madness by the medical community. [...] By the end of the 20th century, personal computers had entered our homes, the Internet was a global phenomenon, and almost identical worries were widely broadcast through chilling headlines: CNN reported that "Email 'hurts IQ more than pot'," the Telegraph that "Twitter and Facebook could harm moral values" and the "Facebook and MySpace generation 'cannot form relationships'," and the Daily Mail ran a piece on "How using Facebook could raise your risk of cancer." Not a single shred of evidence underlies these stories, but they make headlines across the world because they echo our recurrent fears about new technology.

[kimba1]

uhm
since in the month of january I cut myself from the internet.
I gotta say my problem solving abilities has gone up big time.
the net may not of cut down my IQ ,but it sure did tie up abit of my brain functions.
I got ALOT of things done last month.

[Amianthus]

I gotta say my problem solving abilities has gone up big time.

Actually, there was a study published not that long ago that indicated that people who Google a lot tended to do better at problem solving.

[Xavier_Onassis]

Actually, there was a study published not that long ago that indicated that people who Google a lot tended to do better at problem solving.
=======================================

I am sure that this is true.

So is the reverse: people who are good at problem solving and are observant are good at googling. Once you understand how Google works, what it accepts and what it ignores, you get better results.

[kimba1]

I wiki more than i google

is that better or worst?

but mostly it`s a combination of sources to get the most data possible.