DebateGate
General Category => 3DHS => Topic started by: Plane on February 07, 2016, 09:36:36 PM
-
http://billmoyers.com/story/elizabeth-warren-recalls-a-time-when-big-donors-may-have-changed-hillarys-vote/
One of the biggest donors to campaign funds is the financial and credit sector.
I think they are giving so much that any winner that can win will be beholden.
Bernie Sanders isn't going to win ,but he might serve us well by underlining this.
-
Bernie is the only candidate that ever has promised to break up the TBTF banks.
Income equality is clearly more important to more people than any other issue.
-
I would certainly like to have an income equal to Hillary R. Clinton.
But I might not like to prostitute myself to that degree to get it.
-
There is only ONE CANDIDATE who will bust up the big banks. Not one of the asshole Republicans has uttered a peep about it. It is obvious who and what caused the Juniorbush Recession and not a one of them has been prosecuted. They are blaming Obama for the Recession that Juniorbush left him with.
-
Income equality is clearly more important to more people than any other issue.
Doesn't even break the top 4 of any polling
-
Income equality is clearly more important to more people than any other issue.
Doesn't even break the top 4 of any polling
It is sort of a synthetic issue, for the sake of having an issue it is created.
-
There is only ONE CANDIDATE who will bust up the big banks.
You must mean Sanders.
Because you haven't been paying attention to Carson.
-
I saw a great graphic the other day. Person A makes 50k, and person B makes 25k. Economy booms, and both double their income, with person A now making 100k, and person B now making 50k
A free market captalist would see that as great news....for everyone
A socialist would look at the now wider "income gap", and proclaim how horrible the system is