DebateGate
General Category => 3DHS => Topic started by: Christians4LessGvt on February 13, 2015, 12:21:13 PM
-
Potential presidential candidate Scott Walker must be doing something right he's scaring the daylights out of lib elites.
On MSNBC today Howard Dean said Walker not having a college degree makes the WI governor "unknowledgeable" about "the world."
Like those dummies Jobs, Gates & Harry Truman.
You see, only DC brainiacs with advanced degrees in economics are "knowledgeable" enough to get America $18T in debt.
And those at the State Department, with their fancy "poli sci" diplomas, are now very "knowledgeable" on the topics of:
1) evacuated embassies
2) murdered ambassadors &
3) the exponential growth of radical Islam.
It was a "brilliant" MIT professor who lied repeatedly to pass the boondoggle known as Obamacare.
And at Harvard Obama learned that there are "57 states", "Austrian" is spoken in Austria and corpsman is pronounced "corpseman."
Sorry Howard, but with all the anti-American, "social justice" crapola being taught at colleges not having a degree will be a resume enhancer for future presidents.
-
Walker is a union-busting fool. Not only is he a horrible public speaker, he is poison, and Hillary would easily beat him.
Not that the Oligarchy will give him a chance. the money is behind Jebby.
It is certainly true that a university degree does not make a person knowledgeable about the world, as Rick Perry has proven beyond the shadow of a doubt.
Latinos detest and abhor the Tea Party and the GOP and there are more of them than ever. And they vote every four years.
Watch for a rerun of the 2012 primaries, followed by a rerun of the 2016 elections.
But with more money and probably not even as many real issues being discussed in any knowledgeable way.
I have observed that no conceivable candidate for president can go long without someone from the opposite party offering criticism from someone in the opposing party. This does not mean anyone is scaring anyone.
-
Walker is a union-busting fool. Not only is he a horrible public speaker, he is poison,
Public speaking isn't a prerequisite to being a leader, not to mention it was the PEOPLE of Wisconsin that "busted" the Unions, that was in the process of bankrupting the state. I realize the left focuses on imperialistic manuevers to push their agenda, be it executive actions, or legislating thru a Judge's ruling, but the rest of us patriotic folk still believe in the concept of voting and the Constitution. Walker ran on what he did, and despite the best efforts of the left, was elected and re-elected, BY THE PEOPLE, for those efforts. Your beef is with democracy, not Walker
and Hillary would easily beat him. Not that the Oligarchy will give him a chance. the money is behind Jebby.
Opinion on who would beat who aside, you mean like the Oligarchy is intent on having Hillary be their beck & call Democrat pet?
It is certainly true that a university degree does not make a person knowledgeable about the world, as Rick Perry has proven beyond the shadow of a doubt.
Doesn't seem to have been any help to our current Appeaser & chief, so.....apparently a university degree is merely, something to put on you wall. Maybe Obama can make it more important by taking a selfie with it
-
I think Walker/Rubio or Rubio/Walker will be the ticket and they are winning tickets.
Hillary is too old looking and corrupt.
(http://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/future/images/4/4a/Old_hillary.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20121218173046)
-
Reagan looked older. And Hillary is far less corrupt than the least corrupt Republican't.
Stop pushing stupid photoshop photos. They won't get you anywhere.
Public speaking is DEFINITELY a necessity for any president of this country.
Bob Dole, Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan were mediocre speakers.
Juniorbush went on a national campaign to trash Social Security and it got him nowhere, because he could not get his ideas across.
The last really poor speaker we elected was "Silent" Calvin Coolidge.
Walker will surge somewhere in the primaries, as will several others, but Jebbie has the bucks and the billionaires.
-
Public speaking is nice, but in no way a prerequisite. Bush II was one of the worst public speakers, and was elected... TWICE, so that kind of blows a pretty huge hole into your theory. Not to mention that Walker was elected, and then re-elected....by those damn people again. Those same people that voted down the spector of debt driving public unions. Damn democracy
It's acutally pretty hysterical though....if you're a Republican and a good speaker, people are writing your speeches, and manipulating you like a puppet, controlled by a nameless, faceless Oligarchy. If you're a Republican and not a good speaker, its somehow demonstrates that you don't have the intellect to hold office. In other words, if you're a Republican, the best thing you can do is not speak....right?
But you're right, the Oligarchy is throwing its billions behind good 'ol Hillary. I wonder how short her puppet strings are going to be
-
Walker may or may not have the intellect to be president, but I would not vote for him because I detest the Republican view of what a government should be, I loathe union busters, and I abhor the constant war after war that the idiot Republican'ts have gotten my country into.
Walker will try, but he will fail. A majority of the country does not want more Juniorbush/Cheney crap: useless wars, refusing to pass laws, and a horrible recession caused by a lack of proper regulation.
-
Governor Walker is a better public speaker than Hillary!
People see the results of great teleprompter readers and it ain't pretty!
Obama has presided over 5 of the 6 largest deficits in U.S. History.
-
I do appreciate the honesty in the professor's intent not to vote for a Presidential candidate Scott Walker, due specifically in that he's a Republican. Let me however try to quickly address the multiple tangents that sprang from that last post....
- "What Government should be", is precisely what's outlined in the Constitution....no more, no less. The fed has specific functions, while the States are clear to take care of the rest, as they see fit...so long as its not unconstitutional. For the professor and Dems that don't like that, the Constitution even has the built in provision of being able to be amended....to appease the issues that the professor believes Government should be
- The PEOPLE, not Walker, not even Republicans, put a stop to an out of control public sector union that was bankrupting Wisconsin, and is in the process of bankrupting so many more municipalities. Again, the professor's issue isn't with Republicans, as much as its with Democracy. Damn people not smart enough to know what's good for them
- "Useless" wars, that many a Dem supported, and many a Dem still support. Useless in the professor's opinion perhaps, but supported by a bipartisan predominance. Obama himself indicated that he too would have gone to war, when he was 1st campaigning, just that he would have gone mostly into Afghanistan vs Iraq. So, once again, its not a Republican issue, as it is an issue in dealing with the circumstances of current foreign policy reality
- I do have to laugh at "refusing to pass laws". What the professor meant to say was, refusing to pass laws that Democrats wanted/demanded. Xo seem to conveniently forget that the GOP passed bill after bill after bill after bill after bill after bill after bill......etc., that sat on Senator Reid's desk, gathering dust & cobwebs, never even being allowed to be voted on, denying even the chance for a laws to be passed. The Professor's issue isn't with Republicans, its with Reid and the Demawon'ts, as it relates to laws not getting passed
- The recession was caused PRIMARILY by the lack of oversight to Fannie & Freddie, and the policies pushed by BOTH parties, that then pushed lending institutions into approving thousands upon thousands of home loans, that would have otherwise not been approved. It had squat to do with not enough regulation. ::)
-
Your view of reality is sooooo warped. Your ignorance is abysmal. It is clear that you do not read anything except the ratbag right.
Scott Walker is a waste of time, a reactionary who has benefited from people not bothering to vote. No Democrat fears him. He will not get the nomination, and if the impossible occurs and he does, he will lose.
-
Your incoherent rant of an opinion, is duly noted ::)
-
The damn people are not smart enough to vote in every election. Everyone knows this.
-
Scott Walker is a waste of time, a reactionary who has benefited from people not bothering to vote.
This would apply to just about all the other politicians in the USA better than to Scott Walker, he was elected , and survived a recall.
This is what democracy looks like.
-
Carson is one of my favorites, does his doctorate make Howard Dean like him a lot?
-
The damn people are not smart enough to vote in every election. Everyone knows this.
Hmmm, so basically, in trying to interpret that niche of a rant, its only when Dems win elections that the smart people voted?? When in reality its the ones who are most connected with the present issues that matter the most, and recognize the importance to voting, who are the smart ones. At least the ones not bused in by union & democrat handlers
-
The Democrats are far from perfect, but they have the Republicans beat by many a mile. The Republicans have made a serious effort to PREVENT Democrats from voting.
Scott Walker may win a primary or two, but Jebbie is the favorite. Ben Carson is just the next Herman Cain. Fiorella will play the role of Michelle Bachmann.
-
Trust me...this guy scares Democrats for a lot of reasons.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3t5FISmSZsU
-
The Democrats are far from perfect, but they have the Republicans beat by many a mile. The Republicans have made a serious effort to PREVENT Democrats from voting.
Being such actions would be illegal, I'm confident you'll be able to present a plethora of examples, that are literally PREVENTING Democrats from voting
Good luck with that
And Jebbie might be the favorite in some circles, but unlikely to win the nomination
-
Yeah, all you clowns were apeshit over Herman Cain as I recall.
-
The Republicans have made a serious effort to PREVENT Democrats from voting.
Being such actions would be illegal, I'm confident you'll be able to present a plethora of examples, that are literally PREVENTING Democrats from voting
Good luck with that
Didn't think so
-
They are hardly going to admit that they are trying to prevent people from voting, as that asshole Republican't Rick Scott did right in my own precinct in 2012 by reducing the number of polling places. The bastard claimed that he and the Rebublican't asshole legislature were trying to save taxpayers money.
-
So....its all just your ongoing error-saturated opinion. Let's just say there's far more evidence of Demcrats trying to prevent Republicans from voting, suffice to say, the smart ones managed to avoid those tactics last election. We won't even touch the multiple efforts used to try and keep the military's votes from being counted
-
More from our next President!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTwxgNYHwUA
-
Clearly, a dipshit.
Not a chance.
-
I like his idea to make school vouchers targeted.
-
I still need more detail on the idea