"Clinton's Presidential bid hinges on Failed Surge"

[sirs]

Yea, ................and?  Am I to base my support on 1 issue?

As a matter of fact, yes. On this particular issue, if it is as vital as you and Bt have claimed, I would have thought that it would be the sole focus of the 2008 race.

Well, then you'd be wrong.  If there's a Conservative in the primary with a majority of issues I support, including the war on Iraq, that's who gets my vote.  If it's McCain vs some staunch Anti-war leftist running as the Presidential candidates, then maybe I support McCain.  Maybe

[Brassmask]

Well, then you'd be wrong.  If there's a Conservative in the primary with a majority of issues I support, including the war on Iraq, that's who gets my vote.  If it's McCain vs some staunch Anti-war leftist running as the Presidential candidates, then maybe I support McCain.  Maybe

For me, as I've said many times, there are only two candidates who I would support unequivocably.  Howard Dean running in '08 is about as likely as sirs saying that Bush lied so he's a dream candidate as one of my two.  The other just got nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize for his work on global warming.

Al Gore is the only candidate I would spend time advocating and supporting and working for.

MY question to sirs is:  "Is there a 'Gore' out there for you and if so, who is it?"

[Amianthus]

MY question to sirs is:  "Is there a 'Gore' out there for you and if so, who is it?"

I'll answer for myself; my "dream candidate" is Michael Badnarik.

[BT]

Why would neither of you support McCain? I assume you'd support him in the general election, correct?

No i would not vote for him in the general election. Fact is, I don't trust him.

[Brassmask]

MY question to sirs is:  "Is there a 'Gore' out there for you and if so, who is it?"

I'll answer for myself; my "dream candidate" is Michael Badnarik.

I saw a bumpersticker for him not too long ago.

[sirs]

MY question to sirs is:  "Is there a 'Gore' out there for you and if so, who is it?"

There's a couple.  Lemme get back to you on that, k?

[Brassmask]

MY question to sirs is:  "Is there a 'Gore' out there for you and if so, who is it?"

There's a couple.  Lemme get back to you on that, k?

Sure, we've got something like 21 months.  Take your time.

[sirs]

MY question to sirs is:  "Is there a 'Gore' out there for you and if so, who is it?"

There's a couple.  Lemme get back to you on that, k?

Sure, we've got something like 21 months.  Take your time.

Cool, thanks

[Brassmask]

As facilitated by the Media's favorite poster children, Bill & Hill.  The lean is still there, I'm afraid

FYI, supporting Bill and Hill does not mean the media is biased for the left.  And hang on to your socks and garters, but I agree with your stance that the media did B&H's bidding in undermining anyone the Dems were supporting.  From Dean to Clark to Edwards to Kerry (even post-nomination), the Clinton's undermined the Dems just enough to make sure they lost by a nose.

[sirs]

As facilitated by the Media's favorite poster children, Bill & Hill.  The lean is still there, I'm afraid

FYI, supporting Bill and Hill does not mean the media is biased for the left. 

No, just another in an endless parade in examples of such

[Brassmask]

I submit that the media's bias towards B&H is the same as the one afforded Bush and his cult.

[sirs]

I submit that the media's bias towards B&H is the same as the one afforded Bush and his cult.

LOL......too bad reality doesn't mimic your submission

[Brassmask]

I submit that the media's bias towards B&H is the same as the one afforded Bush and his cult.

LOL......too bad reality doesn't mimic your submission

Oh really?  For the last few years, since 9.11, the Bush "administration" and the DLC types have had free reign and nothing but love from the media.  I feel that if Hillary becomes the first woman US "president", it will be a sign that the DLC and the Neo-cons have been in cahoots for decades and are merely agents of some group, perhaps the Bildebergers or something similar and nameless, merely a group of likeminded people who have taken it upon themselves to choose the direction of humanity.

[Amianthus]

For the last few years, since 9.11, the Bush "administration" and the DLC types have had free reign and nothing but love from the media.

ROFLMAO

[sirs]

For the last few years, since 9.11, the Bush "administration" and the DLC types have had free reign and nothing but love from the media.  

As I said, completely disconnected from reality. 

I realize Brass, that to you, unless a paper is openly calling for Bush's Impeachement, they must be then by design in love with Bush and his policies.  But here in the real world, where it's 24/7 doom and gloom reporting about Bush and his apparent endless failures, be it Iraq, the War on Terror, the nefarious cloak of secrecy and attacks on the Constitution, or Domestic issues like the economy, energy, & education abounding, your "submission" remains completely depolarized from current reality. The few successes that are reported are frequently twisted to make even those negative.  But thank you for the confirmation though.