DebateGate
General Category => 3DHS => Topic started by: BT on October 23, 2011, 09:51:24 PM
-
(http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/mt/assets/science/assets_c/2011/10/OWSvsTP-thumb-615x336-66095.jpg)
-
Their Answer: Ron Paul
-
Interesting
-
Ron Paul is no answer to anything.
-
And from all indications, neither is Obama
-
All of YOUR indications, you mean.
-
No, that would be the country's. Current polling of the country helps to validate that point
-
Watch and see how Ron Paul's campaign goes nowhere, how no one will pay attention to him, and how he will never get nominated for any national office. All you can say is that he is more honest than Rick Perry, even if he has failed to mention that most important of issues, who cuts Mitt Romney's lawn?
-
LOL....nice deflection effort. Here's a news flash, I'm no Ron Paul fan, though he would be marginally better than Obama. At this point, pretty much any Republican, and most Democrats would be
-
It is not a deflection. The subject is that Ron Paul is a viable candidate, and I am saying that he will never be President, because he will never get the nomination.
That is not a deflection.
Your claiming it is a deflection is a deflection.
-
Like with global warming, time will tell.
BSB
-
It is not a deflection.
Sure it is, since I'm not the one who brought Paul into this conversation, in which you responded to. The subject was who wasn't an answer to anything. I included Obama in that answer, to which I cited polls supporting that.
Nice try though
-
And you wonder still why I will not debate you.
It is always a waste of time.
Yes it is!
No it's not!
It's a deflection!
No it's not.
-
No, you selectively respond where you can just make insults, or provide a generic response you hope doesn't demonstrate how wrong you are. You avoid answering direct questions, when it WOULD demonstrate your flawed logic, or *gulp* shows how right someone like myself is