DebateGate
General Category => 3DHS => Topic started by: sirs on November 10, 2015, 05:46:38 PM
-
Can't help but notice how the LSM seems to have glossed right over Obama's plethora of lies, and the current Democratic Presidential Front Runner's, smoking gun of a Benghazi lie, in front of Congress no less, and instead are expending an exponential amout of time and energy looking into what Carson supposedly did or said in his High School years or what Rubio payed back to the GOP, using a credit card. What was that amount again?....20 something thousand? And what's the amount the Clinton Foundation has been raking in while Clinton was SoS again.....millions??
Transparent double standard??...........................naaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
-
Everyone but you is sick unto death hearing about e mails and Benghazi.
Carson is so horrible at lying that it has become amusing. But have no fear, they will not spend six months yammering about it as they have Benghazi.
-
Amazing to watch a debate tonight where the moderators are actually asking substantive questions instead of partisan "gotcha" bullshit questions about things that do not matter. These moderators thus far are not agenda driven hacks.
-
Everyone but you is sick unto death hearing about e mails and Benghazi.
No...that'd be Every leftist and Clinton sycophant is "sick unto death" about being shown over and over and over how Clinton lied, and lied, and lied some more, in front of all to see. No wonder you're so sick to death of it. You best stop watching Fox, and start watching all the other LSM outlets that gave her a pass
Carson is so horrible at lying that it has become amusing.
And what exactly has he said that he knew to be false, but said it anyway?? The Westmorland meeting hasn't been debunked. The scholarship debacle is no longer a debacle, as the reference to scholarships was in fact on the cover brochure of West Point, so they indeed apparently offered scholarships at the time Carson was dialoguing with them. No one has debunked his anger issues when in high-school. So, where's your Clinton-like smoking gun of a lie?? Did he turn in a high-school book 2 days late, when he claimed he turned it in, on time??
-
Amazing to watch a debate tonight where the moderators are actually asking substantive questions instead of partisan "gotcha" bullshit questions about things that do not matter. These moderators thus far are not agenda driven hacks.
Indeed. I was unable to catch it tonight, but the over all reviews I've heard was that it was indeed a debate of substance....which is why Rubio came out on top again, and Trump not-so-much. As grand as Trump is in portraying serious needs and ideas, he frequently comes up short on substance and specifics.
The Consensus was that Rubio was the clear winner, followed by Cruz in a distant 2nd. Carson is said to have done well, only because apparently his bar was very low, as in he performed better on the substantive issues, than many expected. Supposedly Fiorina & Bush did "ok", but not enough to push their numbers up at all. Not sure why Paul & Kasich are still there, but so be it
-
A friend asked me several weeks ago who I thought would be the nominee and I said "Rubio".
Months ago I had a "Rubio '16" bumper sticker custom made,
but then he was deciding vote on the Obama Trade Bill and
I ripped the sticker off my SUV and stopped donating to his campaign.
Although I may like others better, Rubio might be our best
bet to beat Hillary so I would certainly support him. Marco
brings a lot to the table and will present a huge contrast to the old
has-been untrustworthy baggage filled Hillary. The Democrats
would certainly have a harder time demonizing Marco Rubio
than they would some of the others.
-
Rubio is a lightweight and corrupt. He will do just as his big contributors tell him, which is what he did in the FL legislature. He might get the nomination, but Kasich is the only one remotely intelligent about how to run the country.
-
Corrupt has no place in conversation, if you're planning on supporting the queen of corruption.
-
Rubio has Clinton beat hands down for corruption.
-
Clinton is so far out in front of Rubio on supposed curruption, on his part, that she's lapped him, 3x over
-
Rubio has Clinton beat hands down for corruption.
yeah sure Rubio doesn't really have a pot to pee in
and the Clinton's have made $230 million dollars without producing a product, starting a business, or won the Lotto.
get real....it's not even close!
-
Putting aside the Clinton Foundations shenanigans & millions that they took in, including foreign sources, while she was SoS, her Benghazi cover-up & lying to congress, her attempts to circumvent transparency with her using her own e-mail server, if we were to apply the LSM's attempts at uberscrutinizing a candidate's earlier records, such as whitewater, there'd be even far more levels of corruption, that Rubio couldn't even dream up. And that's not even including the LSM's attempts to hyperscrutinize when she was in College, and even high school, they way they're doing with Carson, which would likely open up a kingdom of conflict
-
Rubio has Clinton beat hands down for corruption.
yeah sure Rubio doesn't really have a pot to pee in
and the Clinton's have made $230 million dollars without producing a product, starting a business, or won the Lotto.
get real....it's not even close!
So C...let's have you play devil's advocate.....rank the worst 3 Rubio "corruption" accusations, and then let's see how credible any of them are
-
Isn't it possible that Hillary Clinton has accepted many millions of foreign contributions via her foundations Canadian branch which doesn't report to the IRS....
...COMPLETELY HONESTLY?
-
Everyone but you is sick unto death hearing about e mails and Benghazi.
Carson is so horrible at lying that it has become amusing. But have no fear, they will not spend six months yammering about it as they have Benghazi.
Sick of stonewalling did not take long at all.
Doesn't Hillary owe the public the cost of this investigation , because she had the means to satisfy the question without investigation from the first?
If you don't mind an older chestnut, remember that Hillary could not answer a summons to produce Rose law firm pay records until the trail had cooled.
This is a very established pattern or should I say habit ,.. or M.O.?
-
Indeed. .... though I don't see this tactic as Clinton-centric, though I guess you could lay claim they started and perfected the tactic
-
Rubio has Clinton beat hands down for corruption.
yeah sure Rubio doesn't really have a pot to pee in
and the Clinton's have made $230 million dollars without producing a product, starting a business, or won the Lotto.
get real....it's not even close!
So C...let's have you play devil's advocate.....rank the worst 3 Rubio "corruption" accusations, and then let's see how credible any of them are
Yea, I really couldn't come up with any "corruption" scandals either
-
So C...let's have you play devil's advocate.....rank the worst 3 Rubio "corruption" accusations, and then let's see how credible any of them are
Senator Rubio charged some personal stuff on his GOP Party AmEx card, but he reimbursed all the personal charges?
Senator Rubio got 4 traffic tickets in 17 years?
Senator Rubio bought a fishing boat and paid off student loans by writing a book?
-
Agreed C, as those are probably the "3 biggies". So:
- Where's the "corruption"? (especially if he's supposed to beat Clinton "hands down", in that regards)
- How's it even a scandal when he has payed everything back? (with his own money even, not donations)
Corruption is alot like lying....in that the person knows one thing but does another. They have a choice of either acting good or acting nefariously/dishonestly, for whatever reason. Having to count pennies, take out loans, use a credit card is neither dishonest nor corrupt, especially of one pays back that which they borrowed or owed. Now, if what they're using to pay back was acquired thru nefarious acts/means, that's different. Any evidence that Rubio used unseamly obtained monies to pay back his debts??