DebateGate

General Category => 3DHS => Topic started by: Knutey on September 08, 2007, 11:16:51 PM

Title: Yet More on the Curious Case of Repub Family Values-(Especially the Craigs of ID
Post by: Knutey on September 08, 2007, 11:16:51 PM
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=3573171&page=1 (http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=3573171&page=1)
Title: Re: Yet More on the Curious Case of Repub Family Values-(Especially the Craigs of ID
Post by: BT on September 09, 2007, 12:11:39 AM
Gotta love liberals.

Bash the gay boy then go after his family.

Doesn't matter anyway. Craigs best defense is the constitution. He was arrested in transit to his official duties. That is against the constitution.


Title: Re: Yet More on the Curious Case of Repub Family Values-(Especially the Craigs of ID
Post by: Knutey on September 09, 2007, 12:41:57 AM
Gotta love liberals.

Bash the gay boy then go after his family.

Doesn't matter anyway. Craigs best defense is the constitution. He was arrested in transit to his official duties. That is against the constitution.




Go 'head . Defend the indefensible and through silly ruses. It is what you always do. I would laugh if you werent so pathetic.
Title: Re: Yet More on the Curious Case of Repub Family Values-(Especially the Craigs o
Post by: Lanya on September 09, 2007, 12:58:48 AM
He plead guilty.
He plead to a lesser charge, I think I read.  Wonder if that will make a difference when he goes back there with his high-powered legal defense team? 
Title: Re: Yet More on the Curious Case of Repub Family Values-(Especially the Craigs of ID
Post by: BT on September 09, 2007, 01:04:18 AM
Quote
He plead guilty.
He plead to a lesser charge, I think I read.  Wonder if that will make a difference when he goes back there with his high-powered legal defense team? 

Doesn't matter. No arrest. No plea.

Section 6. The Senators and Representatives shall receive a compensation for their services, to be ascertained by law, and paid out of the treasury of the United States. They shall in all cases, except treason, felony and breach of the peace, be privileged from arrest during their attendance at the session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any speech or debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other place.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.articlei.html#section6
Title: Re: Yet More on the Curious Case of Repub Family Values-(Especially the Craigs of ID
Post by: Knutey on September 09, 2007, 02:00:26 AM
Quote
He plead guilty.
He plead to a lesser charge, I think I read.  Wonder if that will make a difference when he goes back there with his high-powered legal defense team? 

Doesn't matter. No arrest. No plea.

Section 6. The Senators and Representatives shall receive a compensation for their services, to be ascertained by law, and paid out of the treasury of the United States. They shall in all cases, except treason, felony and breach of the peace, be privileged from arrest during their attendance at the session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any speech or debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other place.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.articlei.html#section6

This is the best news all your RW Repub Senators can have. Pervert away. You  are free to do so as long you are doing it on business- LMFAO@U.net.
Title: Re: Yet More on the Curious Case of Repub Family Values-(Especially the Craigs of ID
Post by: BT on September 09, 2007, 02:08:33 AM
What is sad is Craig even told the cop he was a Senator and had to catch his flight.

maybe Craig could send him a copy of the constitution and that he can pin on the stall wall so he has something to read whilst running his sting.

Title: Re: Yet More on the Curious Case of Repub Family Values-(Especially the Craigs of ID
Post by: Knutey on September 09, 2007, 02:13:19 AM
What is sad is Craig even told the cop he was a Senator and had to catch his flight.

maybe Craig could send him a copy of the constitution and that he can pin on the stall wall so he has something to read whilst running his sting.



If you really think that pervert Craig is gonna get off on this bullshit fantasy , you must be starting to drink again like the Bushidiot obviously  is.
http://wonkette.com//politics/dept%27-of-international-affairs/
Title: Re: Yet More on the Curious Case of Repub Family Values-(Especially the Craigs o
Post by: BT on September 09, 2007, 02:21:13 AM
Quote
Also, the South Korean president became completely enraged when Bush Junior refused to say the Korean War was over

Wouldn't the UN be responsible for declaring an end to the hostilities. It was their police action.

Title: Re: Yet More on the Curious Case of Repub Family Values-(Especially the Craigs o
Post by: Knutey on September 09, 2007, 02:54:20 AM
Quote
Also, the South Korean president became completely enraged when Bush Junior refused to say the Korean War was over

Wouldn't the UN be responsible for declaring an end to the hostilities. It was their police action.


I rest my case


























Title: Re: Yet More on the Curious Case of Repub Family Values-(Especially the Craigs o
Post by: BT on September 09, 2007, 03:04:59 AM
What case would you be resting?
Title: Re: Yet More on the Curious Case of Repub Family Values-(Especially the Craigs o
Post by: Knutey on September 09, 2007, 11:53:50 AM
It doesnt surprise me that you would defend not only RW toilette perverts but their rapist and spouse abusing children. After all , you defend war criminals , mass murderers and authors of torture like Bushidiot and big Dickless Cheney.
My quess is that Craig abused and molested them as well which made them this way. I also suspect Bush & Cheney of the same thing which is probly why their daughters are such sluts & pervs .
Your RW family values sure do seem to fuck-up families, dont they?
Title: Re: Yet More on the Curious Case of Repub Family Values-(Especially the Craigs o
Post by: BT on September 09, 2007, 12:49:10 PM
I don't see where pointing out that the arrest of Craig could very well be unconstitutional is defending his actions.

And i certainly don't see what the history of his children have to do with them stating on the record their views of their father.

But i do see a pattern where dems and their agents quickly resort to the nuts and sluts defense when their own motivations are called into play.

Reminds me of the Clinton Era. I'm sure Hillary appreciates that.



Title: Re: Yet More on the Curious Case of Repub Family Values-(Especially the Craigs o
Post by: Knutey on September 09, 2007, 03:54:31 PM
I don't see where pointing out that the arrest of Craig could very well be unconstitutional is defending his actions.

And i certainly don't see what the history of his children have to do with them stating on the record their views of their father.

But i do see a pattern where dems and their agents quickly resort to the nuts and sluts defense when their own motivations are called into play.

Reminds me of the Clinton Era. I'm sure Hillary appreciates that.





You dont see these things because you are blinded by your pedantic partisanship. It was actually y'all that brought sex into the political discourse when you attempted to hang Bill for a simple natural blowjob and  you perv RWers that are now paying for opening that Pandora'a box.You can dish it but not take it like the weinies that you are. I bet Hillary doesnt mind your eating the shit now at all.
Title: Re: Yet More on the Curious Case of Repub Family Values-(Especially the Craigs o
Post by: BT on September 09, 2007, 04:06:18 PM
So for the record you are admitting that Clinton did have sex in a public place and Craig didn't.

Glad we cleared that up.

Title: Re: Yet More on the Curious Case of Repub Family Values-(Especially the Craigs o
Post by: Knutey on September 09, 2007, 04:58:00 PM
So for the record you are admitting that Clinton did have sex in a public place and Craig didn't.

Glad we cleared that up.



Your "record" always consists of bald faced lies. I said he got a heterosexual blow job, but did not specify a place. Your gross old pervert  solicited a some sort of homosexual perverted activity in a public place for sure and probly suckceded many times in getiing some in a public place frequently since he knew how. Besides the Oval office is only public sometimes a men's room in an airport is public always unless it is being cleaned. ( One needs to specify these things because of your anal retentiveness)
Title: Re: Yet More on the Curious Case of Repub Family Values-(Especially the Craigs of ID
Post by: BT on September 09, 2007, 05:10:06 PM
Quote
Your "record" always consists of bald faced lies. I said he got a heterosexual blow job, but did not specify a place.

We know where it took place. In the whitehouse  in a hallway off the oval office. The only private area is the third floor living quarters.

Sex is sex hetero or homo. Clinton took part in a sex act. Craig didn't.

Thanks again for verifying that.



Title: Re: Yet More on the Curious Case of Repub Family Values-(Especially the Craigs of ID
Post by: Knutey on September 09, 2007, 05:51:30 PM
Quote
Your "record" always consists of bald faced lies. I said he got a heterosexual blow job, but did not specify a place.

We know where it took place. In the whitehouse  in a hallway off the oval office. The only private area is the third floor living quarters.

Sex is sex hetero or homo. Clinton took part in a sex act. Craig didn't.

Thanks again for verifying that.





I know you all hate normal sex which is probly why y'all have to play footsies in toilette stalls like the pervs you all are. Nothing is wrong with sex kinky substitutes for sex perversion.
Title: Re: Yet More on the Curious Case of Repub Family Values-(Especially the Craigs of ID
Post by: BT on September 09, 2007, 07:57:15 PM
Quote
I know you all hate normal sex which is probly why y'all have to play footsies in toilette stalls like the pervs you all are. Nothing is wrong with sex kinky substitutes for sex perversion.

When at a loss for counterfacts, insult your opponent. Seems to be a pattern with you guys.

Title: Re: Yet More on the Curious Case of Repub Family Values-(Especially the Craigs of ID
Post by: Knutey on September 09, 2007, 08:05:35 PM
Quote
I know you all hate normal sex which is probly why y'all have to play footsies in toilette stalls like the pervs you all are. Nothing is wrong with sex kinky substitutes for sex perversion.

When at a loss for counterfacts, insult your opponent. Seems to be a pattern with you guys.



That is not an insult . You only think so because it is true and you cant face it. That is a fact.