DebateGate

General Category => 3DHS => Topic started by: BT on July 06, 2008, 12:25:39 AM

Title: We're Back
Post by: BT on July 06, 2008, 12:25:39 AM
That wasn't too painful, was it?
Title: Re: We're Back
Post by: sirs on July 09, 2008, 11:09:25 AM
Not a scratch
Title: Re: We're Back
Post by: Cynthia on July 10, 2008, 01:36:46 AM
That wasn't too painful, was it?

Good going, BT.

Title: Re: We're Back
Post by: kimba1 on July 10, 2008, 01:46:37 AM
whewww
just made it in
I kept getting out for the week sign
then I tried the email link again and finally got in right now
hey ya`ll
saw some news these past few days that hurts that I couldn`t post then.
Title: Re: We're Back
Post by: Brassmask on July 11, 2008, 03:31:04 AM
I was really scared.

Title: Re: We're Back
Post by: Michael Tee on July 11, 2008, 10:32:39 AM
My wife had to bear the full brunt of my ranting and raving.  Her, our TV screen and random strangers.  It's been rough all around.
Title: Re: We're Back
Post by: fatman on July 11, 2008, 01:01:26 PM
Her, our TV screen and random strangers

I'm glad that I don't live in Toronto.
Title: Re: We're Back
Post by: Plane on July 11, 2008, 06:20:25 PM
whew


just in time , the room was running out of Oxigen
Title: Re: We're Back
Post by: chickencounter on July 12, 2008, 10:33:54 AM
Thanks BT!
Title: Re: We're Back
Post by: Amianthus on July 12, 2008, 12:09:46 PM
My wife had to bear the full brunt of my ranting and raving. Her, our TV screen and random strangers. It's been rough all around.

(http://www.penny-arcade.com/images/2004/20040319h.jpg)
Title: Re: We're Back
Post by: Michael Tee on July 12, 2008, 05:17:18 PM
"Total fuckwad," of course, being your definition of anyone who disagrees with you and your crazed fascist theories.
Title: Re: We're Back
Post by: Amianthus on July 12, 2008, 06:08:38 PM
your crazed fascist theories.

Please elaborate; which of my posts have contained "crazed fascist theories"?
Title: Re: We're Back
Post by: BT on July 12, 2008, 07:50:00 PM
Quote
Please elaborate; which of my posts have contained "crazed fascist theories"?

All 'right" folks look-alike.

Title: Re: We're Back
Post by: Michael Tee on July 13, 2008, 06:26:46 PM
<<Please elaborate; which of my posts have contained "crazed fascist theories"?>>

Since you ask, I'll take the easy way out by starting with your recent defence of the homeowner who blew away the trick-or-treating Japanese student on Halloween.  We can reach further back to your claim that your "anti-Nazi" father's school was bombed by the RAF in broad daylight during WWII as well as your general defences of German and Austrian civilian populations on the grounds that they too were "anti-Nazi."
Title: Re: We're Back
Post by: BT on July 13, 2008, 06:43:37 PM
Quote
Since you ask, I'll take the easy way out by starting with your recent defence of the homeowner who blew away the trick-or-treating Japanese student on Halloween.

Home and self protection is hardly Fascist.
Title: Re: We're Back
Post by: Amianthus on July 13, 2008, 07:01:21 PM
Since you ask, I'll take the easy way out by starting with your recent defence of the homeowner who blew away the trick-or-treating Japanese student on Halloween.

As BT said, defense of home and family is not fascist.

We can reach further back to your claim that your "anti-Nazi" father's school was bombed by the RAF in broad daylight during WWII as well as your general defences of German and Austrian civilian populations on the grounds that they too were "anti-Nazi."

A couple of corrections. The bombing was done in the early morning, not "broad daylight". Also, I said that the majority of Austrians were anti-Nazi, not the majority of Germans; I gave statistical evidence for the latter point. And I don't see that claiming "anti-Nazi" sympathies is fascist in nature.
Title: Re: We're Back
Post by: Michael Tee on July 13, 2008, 10:43:28 PM
I think I've wasted enough time responding in kind to your juvenile insults.  I think I'll just promote you from "crazed fascist" to "total fuckwad" and leave it at that.
Title: Re: We're Back
Post by: sirs on July 13, 2008, 11:52:33 PM
translated:  I have nothing but my "I know everything, am smarter than you, and you're an idiot of you don't believe me" opinion
Title: Re: We're Back
Post by: Michael Tee on July 14, 2008, 12:23:32 AM
And a tip o' the hat to sirs for yet another of his incredibly off-the-mark "translations" of what to any sane and normal reader would appear to be a fairly simple and straightforward idea set out in plain and standard English.  One day perhaps sirs will let the rest of us in on what weird and wonderful, mind-altering and reality-bending substance he is smoking when he enters upon one of his totally unnecessary "translating" tasks.
Title: Re: We're Back
Post by: Cynthia on July 14, 2008, 01:06:23 AM
And a tip o' the hat to sirs for yet another of his incredibly off-the-mark "translations" of what to any sane and normal reader would appear to be a fairly simple and straightforward idea set out in plain and standard English.  One day perhaps sirs will let the rest of us in on what weird and wonderful, mind-altering and reality-bending substance he is smoking when he enters upon one of his totally unnecessary "translating" tasks.

d'oh ::)
Title: Re: We're Back
Post by: sirs on July 14, 2008, 01:23:03 AM
And a tip o' the hat to sirs for yet another of his incredibly off-the-mark "translations" of what to any sane and normal reader would appear to be a fairly simple and straightforward idea set out in plain and standard English. 

Kinda like the one that calls anyone to the right of you some crazed fascist.  Oh, and we'd like to thank Cynthia for her contribution as well   ::)
Title: Re: We're Back
Post by: Michael Tee on July 14, 2008, 01:34:21 AM
You can leave me and others out of it, sirs, most of us just like to debate the issues.  You and Ami seem pretty devoted to throwing feces at people, why don't you just face off against each other and let us know who the winner is, oh, in about a hundred years?
Title: Re: We're Back
Post by: Cynthia on July 14, 2008, 02:09:50 AM
And a tip o' the hat to sirs for yet another of his incredibly off-the-mark "translations" of what to any sane and normal reader would appear to be a fairly simple and straightforward idea set out in plain and standard English. 

Kinda like the one that calls anyone to the right of you some crazed fascist.  Oh, and we'd like to thank Cynthia for her contribution as well   ::)

You're welcome;  8)
Title: Re: We're Back
Post by: sirs on July 14, 2008, 02:47:34 AM
You can leave me and others out of it, sirs, most of us just like to debate the issues.  

Yea, I see your level of "debating issues", calling folks that don't agree with you crazed fascists and....... oh yea "total fuckwad".  Can't imagine what it must be like when you simply want to fling feces and personal insults at folks





Title: Re: We're Back
Post by: Michael Tee on July 14, 2008, 07:34:03 AM
<<Yea, I see your level of "debating issues", calling folks that don't agree with you crazed fascists and....... oh yea "total fuckwad".  Can't imagine what it must be like when you simply want to fling feces and personal insults at folks>>

If you were capable of following a thread any further back than the last post - - which of course you are not, so I will have to do it for you - -  you could see that "total fuckwad" was originally AM-a-nazI's totally unprovoked swipe at ME, to which "crazed fascist" was merely a reflex response in the same vein, followed by a retreat to "total fuckwad," AManazI's original insult, in an attempt to close off the whole juvenile thread of mudslinging which you and AManazI seem to be so fond of.

In any event, I have better things to do than continue to trade childish insults with an ass-hole like AManazI or to read back entire threads to the reading-impaired.  So I am sure it will come as a great disappointment to you, but this post represents my last step down that road.  AManazI loves to fling feces, why don't you follow my last suggestion and continue the sport with him?  The two of you seem uniquely well-matched for it.
Title: Re: We're Back
Post by: sirs on July 14, 2008, 02:28:21 PM
The fine art of projection, as mastered by the Tee
Title: Re: We're Back
Post by: Amianthus on July 14, 2008, 03:46:16 PM
If you were capable of following a thread any further back than the last post - - which of course you are not, so I will have to do it for you - -  you could see that "total fuckwad" was originally AM-a-nazI's totally unprovoked swipe at ME, to which "crazed fascist" was merely a reflex response in the same vein, followed by a retreat to "total fuckwad," AManazI's original insult, in an attempt to close off the whole juvenile thread of mudslinging which you and AManazI seem to be so fond of.

It's a funny cartoon (published quite a while ago) that fit in with the theme of the discussion.

I'm sorry that you have no sense of humour about yourself.
Title: Re: We're Back
Post by: Michael Tee on July 14, 2008, 04:59:44 PM
<<It's a funny cartoon (published quite a while ago) that fit in with the theme of the discussion.>>

If that's the case, I'm sorry (and somewhat embarrassed) to have reacted as I did, but if it was only a joke, why didn't you just say so immediately when I first reacted to it with such obvious anger?

<<I'm sorry that you have no sense of humour about yourself.>>

I dunno, I thought that my remarks preceding your "fuckwad" cartoon were semi-funny and were directed entirely at myself.
Title: Re: We're Back
Post by: Xavier_Onassis on July 14, 2008, 05:29:25 PM
What is a "fuckwad"?
Are there both total and partial fuckwads?

Title: Re: We're Back
Post by: Michael Tee on July 14, 2008, 05:40:50 PM
I just figured it was ejaculated material, as in the phrase "shot  his wad."  The "fuck" wasn't redundant, because there is also a "wad" of dollar bills and the two together have a nice, pleasing sound as a term of abuse, kind of like "dipshit."
Title: Re: We're Back
Post by: fatman on July 14, 2008, 05:57:32 PM
SHHHH

You're going to start CU4 off on a rant against the dreaded "F-Bomb" again.
Title: Re: We're Back
Post by: Amianthus on July 14, 2008, 06:10:59 PM
If that's the case, I'm sorry (and somewhat embarrassed) to have reacted as I did, but if it was only a joke, why didn't you just say so immediately when I first reacted to it with such obvious anger?

I tried being logical about it, hoping you would calm down.