DebateGate

General Category => 3DHS => Topic started by: sirs on September 25, 2008, 07:18:40 PM

Title: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: sirs on September 25, 2008, 07:18:40 PM
...now, what would you do to facilitate a getting out of the current Housing market/Lender induced economic mess??

1st off, no Tax payer monies to the lending institutions
2nd off, no socializing or Federal takeover of the Housing industry

Now, where can we go from there?
Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: Plane on September 25, 2008, 08:48:11 PM
...now, what would you do to facilitate a getting out of the current Housing market/Lender induced economic mess??

1st off, no Tax payer monies to the lending institutions
2nd off, no socializing or Federal takeover of the Housing industry

Now, where can we go from there?


Make a strong tax advantaged saveings account availible to the public.

The saveings intrest  rate would not be very much more than other institutions , but the tax advantages would be strong leverage.

Encourage the public to buy bonds or shares in the account , and use the resultant moneys to rebuild and back Fanny Mae.

Minimum requirements of loans Fannie can buy are changed mildly to reduce default rates .
Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: Brassmask on September 25, 2008, 08:51:37 PM
...now, what would you do to facilitate a getting out of the current Housing market/Lender induced economic mess??

1st off, no Tax payer monies to the lending institutions
2nd off, no socializing or Federal takeover of the Housing industry

Now, where can we go from there?

Clearly, it would have to be either a bailout of the American Public or a tax rebate of some kind.
Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: BT on September 25, 2008, 09:04:47 PM
Let them all eat cake.

The greedy call the greedy greedy. <->
Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: sirs on September 25, 2008, 09:42:08 PM
...now, what would you do to facilitate a getting out of the current Housing market/Lender induced economic mess??

Clearly, it would have to be either a bailout of the American Public or a tax rebate of some kind.

Clarify please, since it's not so "clear" to me......Who specifically is getting "bailed out"?  Who's the tax rebates supposed to go to, & for what purpose?  How does this "fix" the source of the problem that brought about the economic debacle, in the 1st place?

I'm liking Plane's approach, so far
Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: Brassmask on September 25, 2008, 09:46:19 PM
Seriously though, here is how I would approach the situation:
I would...

1.)  ...order a study to be conducted on the whole situation by, not one, but 3 seperate panels of 3 economists each to understand the issue and what is involved in the whole situation.  I would give them three weeks to compile some kind of report of findings on the situation from the perspective of the homeowners, Wall Street and the law.  I would totally remove the political element of congress and the Fed, if that is even feasible.

2.) ...call for an immediate 3 month amnesty on mortgage loans that are in danger of foreclosure and already in foreclosure and freeze those situations.

3.) ...order congress to immediately begin formulating regulation for the financial sector with specifics for predatory lending, for buying and selling debt and totally re-habbing Freddie and Fannie.

4.) ...send a bill to congress for an immediate stimulus package for $3000 to any household making under something like $150,000 and no one else.  (Those making more than that number who are in mortgage trouble can make use of the 3 month amnesty to get their shit together.)

5.)  ...send a bill to congress ordering and funding all schools to start teaching home economics and civics as required courses starting fall 2009.



What has happened now is the Paulson and Benanke have played by the Bush/Cheney playbook and made the argument HOW MANY BILLIONS and WHEN?.  The discussion should be what's the issue and how does it affect everyone and what are the short term goals, then longterm goals and how can we make sure it never happens again?












(There is also the aspect of how to head this off in the future by creating more jobs, cutting taxes for those making less than $150,000, ending the Bush tax cuts, cutting out tax loopholes for corporations, getting America off its oil habit, stopping urban sprawl by offering tax breaks and grants (GRANTS) for those who buy homes in the inner city and for those who renovate homes in the inner city for re-sale and by creating a very large federal tax on any new broken ground, and if things went really well for the first couple of years, I'd cap salaries of CEO's like one of the sports leagues did on salaries and parachutes.)
Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: sirs on September 25, 2008, 09:50:55 PM
I have to leave in a few minutes, so I have no time for any substantive response, but I'll endeavor to look at this later, and see where we MIGHT be able to compromise, since off hand, I sure see alot of socialism built into the bottom rung of your proposals.  But I appreciate the effort.
Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: Lanya on September 25, 2008, 10:02:03 PM
this is from James K. Galbraith

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/24/AR2008092403033.html (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/24/AR2008092403033.html)


By James K. Galbraith
Thursday, September 25, 2008; Page A19

Now that all five big investment banks -- Bear Stearns, Merrill Lynch, Lehman Brothers, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley -- have disappeared or morphed into regular banks, a question arises.
 
Is this bailout still necessary?

The point of the bailout is to buy assets that are illiquid but not worthless. But regular banks hold assets like that all the time. They're called "loans."

With banks, runs occur only when depositors panic, because they fear the loan book is bad. Deposit insurance takes care of that. So why not eliminate the pointless $100,000 cap on federal deposit insurance and go take inventory? If a bank is solvent, money market funds would flow in, eliminating the need to insure those separately. If it isn't, the FDIC has the bridge bank facility to take care of that.

Next, put half a trillion dollars into the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. fund -- a cosmetic gesture -- and as much money into that agency and the FBI as is needed for examiners, auditors and investigators. Keep $200 billion or more in reserve, so the Treasury can recapitalize banks by buying preferred shares if necessary -- as Warren Buffett did this week with Goldman Sachs. Review the situation in three months, when Congress comes back. Hedge funds should be left on their own. You can't save everyone, and those investors aren't poor.

With this solution, the systemic financial threat should go away. Does that mean the economy would quickly recover? No. Sadly, it does not. Two vast economic problems will confront the next president immediately. First, the underlying housing crisis: There are too many houses out there, too many vacant or unsold, too many homeowners underwater. Credit will not start to flow, as some suggest, simply because the crisis is contained. There have to be borrowers, and there has to be collateral. There won't be enough.

In Texas, recovery from the 1980s oil bust took seven years and the pull of strong national economic growth. The present slump is national, and it can't be cured that way. But it could be resolved in three years, rather than 10, by a new Home Owners Loan Corp., which would rewrite mortgages, manage rental conversions and decide when vacant, degraded properties should be demolished. Set it up like a draft board in each community, under federal guidelines, and get to work.

The second great crisis is in state and local government. Just Tuesday, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg announced $1.5 billion in public spending cuts. The scenario is playing out everywhere: Schools, fire departments, police stations, parks, libraries and water projects are getting the ax, while essential maintenance gets deferred and important capital projects don't get built. This is pernicious when unemployment is rising and when we have all the real resources we need to preserve services and expand public investment. It's also unnecessary.

What to do? Reenact Richard Nixon's great idea: federal revenue sharing. States and localities should get the funds to plug their revenue gaps and maintain real public spending, per capita, for the next three to five years. Also, enact the National Infrastructure Bank, making bond revenue available in a revolving fund for capital improvements. There is work to do. There are people to do it. Bring them together. What could be easier or more sensible?

Here's another problem: the wealth loss to near-retirees and the elderly from a declining stock market as things shake out. How about taking care of this, with rough justice, through a supplement to Social Security? If you need a revenue source, impose a turnover tax on stocks.

Next, let's think about what the next upswing should try to achieve and how it should be powered. If the 1960s were about raising baby boomers and the '90s about technology, what should the '10s and '20s be about? It's obvious: energy and climate change. That's where the present great unmet needs are.

So, let's use the next few years to plan, mapping out a program of energy conservation, reconstruction and renewable power. Let's get the public sector and the universities working on it. And let's prepare the private sector so that when the credit crunch finally ends, we'll have the firms, the labs, the standards and the talent in place, ready to go.

Some will ask if we can afford it. To see the answer, don't look at budget projections. Just look at interest rates. Last week, in the panic, the federal government could fund itself, short term, for free. It could have raised money for 30 years and paid less than 4 percent. That's far less than it cost back in 2000.

No country in this situation is broke, or insolvent, or even in much trouble. For once, Wall Street's own markets speak the truth. The financially challenged customer isn't Uncle Sam. He's up on Wall Street, where deregulation, greed and fraud ran wild.

James K. Galbraith is the author of "The Predator State: How Conservatives Abandoned the Free Market and Why Liberals Should Too."

Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: Xavier_Onassis on September 26, 2008, 02:26:43 AM
Galbraith is a very smart guy. He is always worth listening to.
Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: _JS on September 26, 2008, 04:31:10 PM
Abolish private property.
Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: Plane on September 26, 2008, 04:38:35 PM
Abolish private property.


  That is happening by accident , it is part of the crisis.
Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: _JS on September 26, 2008, 04:44:58 PM
Abolish private property.


  That is happening by accident , it is part of the crisis.

No, I don't think you understand.

Need credit to get a loan to get a home?


No. Abolish private property.

CEO's overpaid, while workers receive nothing from massive government settlement?


Nope. Abolish private property. From each according to his ability to each according to his need.
Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: richpo64 on September 26, 2008, 04:49:34 PM
Communism.

Yeah. How many people do you plan on starving to death?
Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: Plane on September 26, 2008, 04:54:10 PM
Abolish private property.


  That is happening by accident , it is part of the crisis.

No, I don't think you understand.

Need credit to get a loan to get a home?


No. Abolish private property.

So who builds the houses?

Quote

CEO's overpaid, while workers receive nothing from massive government settlement?


Nope. Abolish private property. From each according to his ability to each according to his need.

Some CEOs' are getting fired right now , wo is in charge of decideing what they can do and what they need?
Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: richpo64 on September 26, 2008, 05:01:10 PM
>>So who builds the houses?<<

Why you do of course. If you refuse, there's always the Gulag.
Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: _JS on September 26, 2008, 05:04:45 PM
The people who currently build houses would build houses. Who else would you expect to build them?

How do you think they determined the balance of what was needed and who had what ability in the Book of Acts from where that quote is taken?

Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: sirs on September 26, 2008, 05:08:21 PM
Js now advocating we become a religious-focused governing body??  ACLU isn't going to like that
Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: _JS on September 26, 2008, 05:09:41 PM
Js now advocating we become a religious-focused governing body??  ACLU isn't going to like that

I imagine that the ACLU wouldn't like a lot of what I propose.
Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: sirs on September 26, 2008, 05:10:43 PM
I imagine not
Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: richpo64 on September 26, 2008, 05:18:48 PM
>>The people who currently build houses would build houses. Who else would you expect to build them?<<

Based on what we know of the history of Communism I would guess anybody JS says should build them. People who disagree with his little communist plan would certainly be in for a surprise. "What do you mean you don't know how to build a house"? "Send him to the camp that teaches people how to build houses." Never to be seen again.

It's amazing that there are actually people alive in 2008 who still think Communism is a good idea.
Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: Plane on September 26, 2008, 05:24:43 PM
The people who currently build houses would build houses. Who else would you expect to build them?

How do you think they determined the balance of what was needed and who had what ability in the Book of Acts from where that quote is taken?



I will need that chapter and verse , my memory is failing to lead me to it.

If I were a carpenter , I would want some pay to come from my work, not based on what calories were needed to keep me alive , but based on the quality and quanity of my work and the fact that you arn't getting my work if you pay too little.

Who am I going to trust to determine what I need ? I like McCain , I even trust him , but not nearly that much. How am I goiing to feel when the government is run by people I can't vote for? This happens now and then you know.
Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: _JS on September 26, 2008, 06:30:21 PM
The people who currently build houses would build houses. Who else would you expect to build them?

How do you think they determined the balance of what was needed and who had what ability in the Book of Acts from where that quote is taken?



I will need that chapter and verse , my memory is failing to lead me to it.

If I were a carpenter , I would want some pay to come from my work, not based on what calories were needed to keep me alive , but based on the quality and quanity of my work and the fact that you arn't getting my work if you pay too little.

Who am I going to trust to determine what I need ? I like McCain , I even trust him , but not nearly that much. How am I goiing to feel when the government is run by people I can't vote for? This happens now and then you know.

Acts 2:44-45

Quote
44 All who believed were together and had all things in common;
45 they would sell their property and possessions and divide them among all according to each one's need.

Acts 4:34-35
Quote
34 There was no needy person among them, for those who owned property or houses would sell them, bring the proceeds of the sale,
35 and put them at the feet of the apostles, and they were distributed to each according to need.

And to answer Rich, it amazes me that this is 2008 and anyone who calls himself a follower of Christ would not subscribe to a system where "There was no needy person among them."
Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: sirs on September 26, 2008, 06:34:10 PM
Subscribe to a system, where you personally can help the needy...yes.  Mandate that everyone else do as well.....NO.  That is NOT what Christ taught.  At least not in any Christian Church, Calvary Church, Church Camp, or Bible Study I ever attended
Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: richpo64 on September 26, 2008, 08:07:36 PM
A communist quoting the Bible. Considering the lack of understanding it takes to be a communist, the Bible is way out of his pay grade.
Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: Plane on September 26, 2008, 08:42:38 PM
The people who currently build houses would build houses. Who else would you expect to build them?

How do you think they determined the balance of what was needed and who had what ability in the Book of Acts from where that quote is taken?



I will need that chapter and verse , my memory is failing to lead me to it.

If I were a carpenter , I would want some pay to come from my work, not based on what calories were needed to keep me alive , but based on the quality and quanity of my work and the fact that you arn't getting my work if you pay too little.

Who am I going to trust to determine what I need ? I like McCain , I even trust him , but not nearly that much. How am I goiing to feel when the government is run by people I can't vote for? This happens now and then you know.

Acts 2:44-45

Quote
44 All who believed were together and had all things in common;
45 they would sell their property and possessions and divide them among all according to each one's need.

Acts 4:34-35
Quote
34 There was no needy person among them, for those who owned property or houses would sell them, bring the proceeds of the sale,
35 and put them at the feet of the apostles, and they were distributed to each according to need.

And to answer Rich, it amazes me that this is 2008 and anyone who calls himself a follower of Christ would not subscribe to a system where "There was no needy person among them."

A church can still do this , a few still do .

If you really like the system you are free to join one of them , or found one.

But one thing that absolutely did not happen was an abolishment of private property.

It was a volentary system , read the last words that Annanias heard , he could have given any part or kept the whole , but he stood condemmed of giveing part and calling it the whole .

I have absolutely no objection to Churches however big or small throwing large or small amounts of resorces into a common pot and living in communal splendor .

I have extreme objection to abolishing private property on non volenteers.

Someone who gives much or even all in service of his faith and his brethren has done a good thing , someone who takes from his brethren what they are unwilling to give has to justify this theft.

Can you adress the other side of this ?

Proverbs 16:26
The laborer's appetite works for him; his hunger drives him on.
Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: _JS on September 27, 2008, 08:37:33 PM
And pray tell, was Christ addressing individuals here? It sure does not sound that way to me.


Matthew 25

Quote
31 "When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, he will sit upon his glorious throne,
32 and all the nations will be assembled before him. And he will separate them one from another, as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats.
33 He will place the sheep on his right and the goats on his left.
34 Then the king will say to those on his right, 'Come, you who are blessed by my Father. Inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world.
35 For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, a stranger and you welcomed me,
36 naked and you clothed me, ill and you cared for me, in prison and you visited me.'
37 Then the righteous 16 will answer him and say, 'Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you drink?
38 When did we see you a stranger and welcome you, or naked and clothe you?
39 When did we see you ill or in prison, and visit you?'
40 And the king will say to them in reply, 'Amen, I say to you, whatever you did for one of these least brothers of mine, you did for me.'
41 Then he will say to those on his left, 'Depart from me, you accursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels.
42 For I was hungry and you gave me no food, I was thirsty and you gave me no drink,
43 a stranger and you gave me no welcome, naked and you gave me no clothing, ill and in prison, and you did not care for me.'
44 Then they will answer and say, 'Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or ill or in prison, and not minister to your needs?'
45 He will answer them, 'Amen, I say to you, what you did not do for one of these least ones, you did not do for me.'
46 And these will go off to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life."
Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: Xavier_Onassis on September 27, 2008, 10:33:47 PM
Nope. Abolish private property. From each according to his ability to each according to his need.


This actually doesn't work too well, because some people are quite versatile and can do many things, while others have great needs, but can't do doodly-squat. Eventually, the former get fed up with doing it all for the latter.

What Jesus suggested doesn't work much better.

Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: sirs on September 27, 2008, 10:50:18 PM
And pray tell, was Christ addressing individuals here? It sure does not sound that way to me.


Matthew 25

Quote
31 "When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, he will sit upon his glorious throne,
32 and all the nations will be assembled before him. And he will separate them one from another, as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats.
33 He will place the sheep on his right and the goats on his left.
34 Then the king will say to those on his right, 'Come, you who are blessed by my Father. Inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world.
35 For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, a stranger and you welcomed me,
36 naked and you clothed me, ill and you cared for me, in prison and you visited me.'
37 Then the righteous 16 will answer him and say, 'Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you drink?
38 When did we see you a stranger and welcome you, or naked and clothe you?
39 When did we see you ill or in prison, and visit you?'
40 And the king will say to them in reply, 'Amen, I say to you, whatever you did for one of these least brothers of mine, you did for me.'
41 Then he will say to those on his left, 'Depart from me, you accursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels.
42 For I was hungry and you gave me no food, I was thirsty and you gave me no drink,
43 a stranger and you gave me no welcome, naked and you gave me no clothing, ill and in prison, and you did not care for me.'
44 Then they will answer and say, 'Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or ill or in prison, and not minister to your needs?'
45 He will answer them, 'Amen, I say to you, what you did not do for one of these least ones, you did not do for me.'
46 And these will go off to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life."[/color]

And....................?
Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: Plane on September 28, 2008, 12:05:54 AM
And pray tell, was Christ addressing individuals here? It sure does not sound that way to me.


Matthew 25

Quote
31 "When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, he will sit upon his glorious throne,
32 and all the nations will be assembled before him. And he will separate them one from another, as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats.
33 He will place the sheep on his right and the goats on his left.
34 Then the king will say to those on his right, 'Come, you who are blessed by my Father. Inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world.
35 For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, a stranger and you welcomed me,
36 naked and you clothed me, ill and you cared for me, in prison and you visited me.'
37 Then the righteous 16 will answer him and say, 'Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you drink?
38 When did we see you a stranger and welcome you, or naked and clothe you?
39 When did we see you ill or in prison, and visit you?'
40 And the king will say to them in reply, 'Amen, I say to you, whatever you did for one of these least brothers of mine, you did for me.'
41 Then he will say to those on his left, 'Depart from me, you accursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels.
42 For I was hungry and you gave me no food, I was thirsty and you gave me no drink,
43 a stranger and you gave me no welcome, naked and you gave me no clothing, ill and in prison, and you did not care for me.'
44 Then they will answer and say, 'Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or ill or in prison, and not minister to your needs?'
45 He will answer them, 'Amen, I say to you, what you did not do for one of these least ones, you did not do for me.'
46 And these will go off to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life."


Yes , nations do not visit persons in prison  , each of these things mentioned here can be done by individuals and though all of these individuals are gathered together on this occasion , they individually earned their membership in the sheep group or the goat group.

Do you think that damnation is earned on a national level?
Unless you do it makes no sense to consider this passage to be about nation wide behavior.
Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: Universe Prince on September 28, 2008, 12:39:42 PM

And pray tell, was Christ addressing individuals here? It sure does not sound that way to me.


Yes, He was. You emphasized "all the nations". It also says "He will separate them one from another, as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats." This, as I understand it, is a process done one at a time. This parable addresses actions that are always portrayed as personal responsibilities. And this parable in Matthew 25 comes after two other parables that are distinctly about individual responsibility. That the parable speaks of groups of individuals does not mean the parable is not about individual responsibility.


Acts 4:34-35
Quote
34 There was no needy person among them, for those who owned property or houses would sell them, bring the proceeds of the sale,
35 and put them at the feet of the apostles, and they were distributed to each according to need.


Those who owned property would sell them. They benefited from having property to sell. And they voluntarily did this. No one was forced to do so, nor was there a mandate from the apostles that all Christians must do so. Following shortly after the above quoted passage we see, in Acts 5:3 & 4, this:
         But Peter said, "Ananias, why has Satan filled your heart to lie to the Holy Spirit and keep back part of the price of the land for yourself? While it remained, was it not your own? And after it was sold, was it not in your own control? Why have you conceived this thing in your heart? You have not lied to men but to God."
Private property had not been abolished among the Christians. People who sold what they owned did so by choice, not because the choice was removed from them. Even Ananias was not punished for keeping part of his profit, but for lying about having given all.
Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: Xavier_Onassis on September 28, 2008, 12:43:04 PM
But Peter said, "Ananias, why has Satan filled your heart to lie to the Holy Spirit and keep back part of the price of the land for yourself? While it remained, was it not your own? And after it was sold, was it not in your own control? Why have you conceived this thing in your heart? You have not lied to men but to God."


Private property had not been abolished among the Christians. People who sold what they owned did so by choice, not because the choice was removed from them. Even Ananias was not punished for keeping part of his profit, but for lying about having given all.

Sounds like the Clinton impeachment, doesn't it? Can a person actually lie to God (or any omniscient being)? Think about it.

Do you suppose Ananias is in Heaven or Hell these days?
Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: Universe Prince on September 28, 2008, 12:52:30 PM

Can a person actually lie to God (or any omniscient being)? Think about it.


Can a person say something untrue to God? I do not see why not.


Do you suppose Ananias is in Heaven or Hell these days?


I will not presume to guess.
Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: Xavier_Onassis on September 28, 2008, 01:01:36 PM
Can a person say something untrue to God? I do not see why not.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
First, there is the problem that God might well not be in existence. He might have died or left the building. Ypu know, like Elvis.

Second, there is the problem that God actually listens or understands something said to him. There is the possibility that the Big Bang was so really big a bang that he is deaf.

Third, if we suppose that Ananias was devout enough to sell some of his stuff (I think the word 'profit' is incorrectly used for at least some of the sale of his assets), then he should be sufficiently clever to also believe that lying to an omniscient, omnipotent being is essentially futile. Such a being , like Sanata Claus, "knows when you are sleeping, knows when you're awake, knows when you've been bad or good, so be good, for goodness' sake" I find it somewhat strange that God himself did not point this out to him, rather than relying on some mortal to do so.

Ananais seems to be a rather negative figure in the Scripture: no one names their kid "Ananais", do they?
I would think that if he had been forgiven, this would have been mentioned.




Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: Universe Prince on September 28, 2008, 09:25:52 PM

First, there is the problem that God might well not be in existence. He might have died or left the building. Ypu know, like Elvis.


To speak of lying to God carries the underlying premise that God exists.


Second, there is the problem that God actually listens or understands something said to him. There is the possibility that the Big Bang was so really big a bang that he is deaf.


Again, that God does in fact understand is an underlying, understood premise.


Third, if we suppose that Ananias was devout enough to sell some of his stuff (I think the word 'profit' is incorrectly used for at least some of the sale of his assets), then he should be sufficiently clever to also believe that lying to an omniscient, omnipotent being is essentially futile. Such a being , like Sanata Claus, "knows when you are sleeping, knows when you're awake, knows when you've been bad or good, so be good, for goodness' sake" I find it somewhat strange that God himself did not point this out to him, rather than relying on some mortal to do so.


Lots of people should be sufficiently clever to believe/understand a number of things, but that does not mean that they do. And to be fair, Ananias, the scripture makes clear, thought he was lying to the church rather than to God. Many, many people even today do not understand that issue. Of course, they don't die, but then they do not end up talking to Peter the Apostle.


Ananais seems to be a rather negative figure in the Scripture: no one names their kid "Ananais", do they?
I would think that if he had been forgiven, this would have been mentioned.


There are a great many things scripture does not mention. Whether Ananias and his wife ended up in heaven is one of them. Seems to me, that isn't relevant to the story.
Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: sirs on September 28, 2008, 09:37:25 PM
And pray tell, was Christ addressing individuals here? It sure does not sound that way to me.

That the parable speaks of groups of individuals does not mean the parable is not about individual responsibility....Private property had not been abolished among the Christians. Those who owned property would sell them. They benefited from having property to sell. And they voluntarily did this.  No one was forced to do so, nor was there a mandate from the apostles that all Christians must do so...People who sold what they owned did so by choice, not because the choice was removed from them. Even Ananias was not punished for keeping part of his profit, but for lying about having given all

Amen

Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: Xavier_Onassis on September 28, 2008, 09:40:10 PM
There are a great many things scripture does not mention. Whether Ananias and his wife ended up in heaven is one of them. Seems to me, that isn't relevant to the story.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I would say that it should be a matter of interest to any Deity who felt that such lying was worth making an example over.

Why pick on the poor guy's wife?

It is also a tad strange that the gist of this seems to be that to refuse to sell all your stuff and give it to the Church is acceptable, as is selling all of it and giving it to the Church. But giving SOME of it away and giving it to the Church and lying about it is a no-no.

A Demiurge would do well to make an example of such a person to prevent other such travesties, I think.
Title: Re: You're President, and you can control Congress
Post by: Universe Prince on September 28, 2008, 10:05:45 PM

I would say that it should be a matter of interest to any Deity who felt that such lying was worth making an example over.


Feel free to take that up with God any time you like.