Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - Christians4LessGvt

Pages: 1 ... 163 164 [165] 166 167 ... 178
2461
3DHS / "NAFTA benefits Ohio workers more than it hurts"
« on: March 11, 2008, 01:01:19 PM »


With exports, NAFTA benefits Ohio workers
much more than it hurts


BY DANIEL W. CHRISTMAN

Trade has become a whipping boy in this year's electoral campaign. As the presidential contest got under way in Iowa a few short weeks ago, some candidates railed about the impact of trade on manufacturing jobs, pointing to a Maytag plant that recently closed, its jobs sent overseas.

But those jobs didn't go overseas; they came to Ohio. Whirlpool, which bought Maytag two years ago, chose to consolidate some of its newly acquired manufacturing facilities in the Buckeye State, adding hundreds of new jobs.

Facts are stubborn things, and so it is with trade in general and the North American Free Trade Agreement in particular. Contrary to what some of the candidates are saying, Ohio is benefiting from trade and from NAFTA in extraordinary ways, and no one more than the state's manufacturers.

To say so is not to dismiss the troubles Ohio manufacturers face; they are serious, and they have serious causes that federal and state officials must address. But the best doctor in the world can't write a proper prescription - let alone promise a cure - without a fact-based diagnosis.

So start with the facts. According to the U.S. Department of Commerce, 55 percent of all Ohio exports go to Canada and Mexico. For the nation as a whole, just 35 percent of exports go to our NAFTA partners. In other words, Ohio depends on exports to Canada and Mexico - markets open to Ohio products thanks to NAFTA - to a far greater degree than other states. Ohio's exports to Canada and Mexico have more than doubled since 1994, when NAFTA came into force.

The NAFTA market is especially important for Ohio manufacturers. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, a total of 777,000 Ohioans are employed in manufacturing. These workers produced $36.5 billion worth of exports in 2006. Exports to Canada and Mexico account for about $20 billion in Ohio's manufacturing output.

Do the math. Ohio manufacturers are bringing in export revenue of $25,000 for every factory worker they employ. The average manufacturing worker brings home a salary of about $42,000. How could Ohio manufacturers make their payroll without their huge and growing sales to Canada and Mexico? The short answer is, they couldn't.

Too often, arguments over trade miss the simple fact that "free trade" agreements like NAFTA are all about fair trade. Many people don't know that the U.S. market is already wide open to imports; our average duty on imports is about 2 percent. But countries such as Colombia and South Korea impose an average tariff on U.S. manufactured goods of 11 percent - just as Mexico did before NAFTA.

That's just not fair. It's as if the Cavaliers had to start a game down nine points from the tip-off. Luckily, the pending trade agreements with these two countries would put U.S. trade relations with these countries on a fairer, mutually beneficial footing. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce estimates the trade agreements with Colombia and South Korea could boost U.S. exports by more than $25 billion.

Saying no to trade deals is the wrong prescription for Ohio manufacturers. And ending NAFTA would be a disaster for the state's manufacturing workers. On trade, politicians campaigning for high office should remember the Hippocratic oath: First, do no harm.

http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080311/EDIT02/803110318/1090

2462
3DHS / Clinton-backer Ferraro: Obama Where He Is Because He's Black
« on: March 11, 2008, 11:19:37 AM »



Clinton-backer Ferraro: Obama Where He Is Because He's Black

March 11, 2008 7:30 AM

Clinton campaign finance committee member, former vice presidential candidate, and former Rep. Geraldine Ferraro, D-NY,  told the Daily Breeze of Torrance, Ca., that, "If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position. And if he was a woman (of any color) he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept."

Of Clinton, Ferraro said that the press "has been uniquely hard on her. It's been a very sexist media. Some just don't like her. The others have gotten caught up in the Obama campaign."

"I was reading an article that said young Republicans are out there campaigning for Obama because they believe he's going to be able to put an end to partisanship. Dear God! Anyone that has worked in the Congress knows that for over 200 years this country has had partisanship - that's the way our country is."

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/03/clinton-backer.html

2463
3DHS / Obama tells the Clintons off and shatters "Dream Ticket" idea
« on: March 10, 2008, 04:33:41 PM »

Obama tells the Clintons off big time.

http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=4422403



2464
3DHS / NY DEM GOVERNOR linked to prostitution ring
« on: March 10, 2008, 03:31:08 PM »


New York Democratic Governor Eliot Laurence Spitzer linked to PROSTITUTION RING


Gov. Eliot Spitzer to hold press conference at 2:15 pm EDT at his Manhattan office... Developing...

2465
3DHS / Army Spc. Monica Lin Brown
« on: March 10, 2008, 02:42:30 PM »


Lake Jackson teen awarded Silver Star for gallantry in Afghanistan

Proud grandmother says she "just did what she was trained to do"

March 9, 2008, 11:26PM

By RENE C. LEE

 
Family photo

Army Spc. Monica Lin Brown is the second woman since World War II to be awarded the Silver Star.
The Silver Star

CRITERIA: Awarded to a person who, while serving in any capacity with the U.S. Army, is cited for gallantry in action.

DESCRIPTION: A gold star, 1.5 inches in circumscribing diameter with a laurel wreath encircling rays from the center and a 3/16 inch diameter silver star superimposed in the center. The pendant is suspended from a rectangular shaped metal loop with rounded corners. The reverse has the inscription "For gallantry in action"

BACKGROUND: The Citation Star was established by Congress on July 9, 1918. On July 19, 1932, the Secretary of War approved the Silver Star medal to replace the Citation Star. Authorization for the Silver Star was placed into law by an Act of Congress for the Navy on August 7, 1942 and an Act of Congress for the Army on December 15, 1942.

Dodging insurgent gunfire, a 19-year-old Lake Jackson soldier used her body to shield five injured comrades after a roadside bomb struck her convoy in Afghanistan last spring. That act of bravery has earned her the Silver Star.

Army Spc. Monica Lin Brown is only the second woman since World War II to receive the medal, one of the nation's highest military awards given for gallantry in combat.

''She just did what she was trained to do," her 74-year-old grandmother, Katy Brown, said from her Lake Jackson home on Sunday.

Monica Brown, a medic, was part of a four-vehicle convoy patrolling near Jani Kheil in the eastern province of Paktia when a bomb struck one of the Humvees on April 25, military officials said.

After the explosion, she braved insurgent gunfire and mortars to reach five wounded soldiers. She shielded them as she administered aid and helped drag them to safety, the military said.

"I did not really think about anything except for getting the guys to a safer location and getting them taken care of and getting them out of there," Monica Brown told The Associated Press on Saturday from a U.S. base in the province of Khowst.

Katy Brown said her granddaughter graduated from Brazos River Charter School in Morgan at 15. She joined the Army with her brother, Justin Brown, in November 2006 to get a college education, Katy Brown said.

She said she is not surprised by her granddaughter's heroics.

''She's just a strong, strong young woman, and she's very caring," Katy Brown said.

Monica Brown told her grandmother she didn't have time to be scared.

She just jumped into action and ''made medics out of those infantry men," Katy Brown said.

Monica Brown, of the 4th Squadron, 73rd Cavalry Regiment, 4th Brigade Combat Team, said ammunition going off inside the burning Humvee was sending shrapnel in all directions. She said they were sitting in a dangerous spot.

"So, we dragged them for 100 or 200 meters, got them away from the Humvee a little bit," she said. "I was in a kind of a robot-mode, did not think about much but getting the guys taken care of."


Monica Brown knew all five wounded soldiers. She said they eventually moved the wounded about 500 yards away and treated them on site before putting them on a helicopter for evacuation.

She is expected to leave Afghanistan on April 15, but Katy Brown didn't know when her granddaughter would arrive home or where she would receive the medal.

Mary Moreno, founder of Military Moms in Lake Jackson, said Monica Brown deserves the medal because she is a giving person.

''When she came home last April, she was an inspiration to all of us," Moreno said. "She became one of us and said, 'What can I do?' "


Monica Brown helped the group pack care packages for soldiers, Moreno said. She also helped them tie yellow ribbons on trees along Oyster Creek Drive in Lake Jackson in honor of the soldiers, she said.

''She is just an amazing young woman who is very down to earth and full of life," Moreno said.

The military said Brown's "bravery, unselfish actions and medical aid rendered under fire saved the lives of her comrades and represents the finest traditions of heroism in combat."

Sgt. Leigh Ann Hester, of Nashville, Tenn., received the Silver Star in 2005 for gallantry during an insurgent ambush on a convoy in Iraq. Two men from Hester's unit, the 617th Military Police Company of Richmond, Ky., also received the Silver Star for their roles in the same action.



Army Spc. Monica Lin Brown saved the lives of fellow soldiers after a
roadside bomb tore through a convoy of Humvees in the eastern Paktia
province in April 2007, the military said. (Rafiq Maqbool: AP)



2466
3DHS / Hugo Chavez must be ousted
« on: March 10, 2008, 11:18:21 AM »

The FARC Files
By MARY ANASTASIA O'GRADY
March 10, 2008; Page A14

Colombia's precision air strike 10 days ago, on a guerrilla camp across the border in Ecuador, killed rebel leader Ra?l Reyes. That was big. But the capture of his computer may turn out to be a far more important development in Colombia's struggle to preserve its democracy.

Reyes was the No. 2 leader of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC, which has been at war with the Colombian government for more than four decades. His violent demise is a fitting end to a life devoted to masterminding atrocities against civilians. But the computer records expose new details of the terrorist strategy to bring down the government of Colombian President ?lvaro Uribe, including a far greater degree of collaboration between the FARC and four Latin heads of government than had been previously known. In addition to Venezuelan President Hugo Ch?vez, they are President Rafael Correa of Ecuador, Nicaragua's President Daniel Ortega and Bolivian President Evo Morales.

Mr. Ch?vez is said to have been visibly distressed when told of the death of Reyes, a man he clearly admired. He also may have realized that he played a role in his hero's death, since it was later reported that the Colombian military had located the camp by intercepting a phone call to Reyes from the Venezuelan president.

Mr. Ch?vez rapidly ordered 10 battalions to the Colombian border. Should the Colombian military cross into Venezuela in search of FARC, he warned, it would mean war. That may have seemed like an unnecessary act of machismo. But the Colombia military has long claimed that the FARC uses both Ecuador and Venezuela as safe havens. Now it had shown that it wasn't afraid to act on that information.

There is a third explanation for Mr. Ch?vez's panic when he learned of the strike: He was alarmed about the possibility that his links with Reyes would be exposed. Sure enough, when the Colombian national police retrieved Reyes's body from Ecuador, it also brought back several computers from the camp. Documents on those laptops show that Mr. Ch?vez and Reyes were not only ideological comrades, but also business partners and political allies in the effort to wrest power from Mr. Uribe.

The tactical discussions found in the documents are hair-raising enough. They show that the FARC busies itself with securing arms and explosives, selling cocaine, and otherwise financing its terrorism operations through crime. In a memo last month, for example, a rebel leader discussed the FARC's efforts to secure 50 kilos of uranium, which it hoped to sell to generate income. In the same note, there is a reference to "a man who supplies me material for the explosive we are preparing, his name is Belisario and he lives in Bogot? . . ."

Though it is far from clear, Colombian national police speculated from this that a dirty bomb could be in the making. An April 2007 letter to the FARC secretariat lays out the terrorists' effort to acquire missiles from Lebanon. When Viktor Bout, allegedly one of the world's most notorious arms traffickers, was arrested in Thailand on Thursday, the Spanish-language press reported that he was located thanks to the Reyes computer files.

The maneuvers of thugs seeking power are no surprise. The more significant revelation is the relationship between the FARC and Mr. Ch?vez, Mr. Correa, Mr. Morales and Mr. Ortega. All four, it turns out, support FARC violence and treachery against Mr. Uribe.

According to the documents, Mr. Ch?vez's friendship with the FARC dates back at least as far as 1992, when he was in jail for an attempted coup d'etat in Venezuela and the FARC sent him $150,000. Now he is returning the favor, by financing the terrorist group with perhaps as much as $300 million. But money is the least important of the Ch?vez gifts. He is also using his presidential credentials on behalf of the FARC.

The FARC puts a lot of effort toward discrediting Mr. Uribe in the court of world opinion. A September letter from a rebel commander to "secretariat comrades" reads: "As to the manifesto, I suggest adding the border policy and making it public by all means possible to see if we can stop all the world from supporting uribismo [the agenda of Mr. Uribe] in the October elections." He then proposes a "clandestine" meeting between one rebel and Mr. Ch?vez in Caracas to discuss "our political-military project." Mr. Ch?vez, the rebels say in a later document, suggested that the FARC videotape any Colombian military strikes in the jungle for propaganda purposes.

In January, FARC leader Manuel Marulanda (aka "Sureshot") wrote to Mr. Ch?vez: "You can imagine the happiness that you have awoken in all the leaders, guerrillas, the Bolivarian Movement of New Colombia [and] the Clandestine Communist Party with the plan you put forth . . . to ask for the analysis and approval of recognizing the FARC as a belligerent [therefore legitimate] force."

The documents also show why it was a good idea for Colombia not to ask Ecuador for permission before moving against the FARC camp -- even though in the past it had done so when tangling with the rebels at the border. A January memo reports on a FARC meeting with the Ecuadorean minister of security, who said that Mr. Correa is "interested in official relations with the FARC" and has decided not to aid Colombia against the rebels. "For [Ecuador] the FARC is an insurgent organization of the people, with social and political proposals that it understands," the memo reads.

It also says Mr. Correa plans to increase commercial and political relations with North Korea, and that he requests that one of the FARC's hostages be released to him next time, so as to "boost his political efforts." A Feb. 28 letter from Reyes summarizes a meeting with an emissary of Mr. Correa: "He explained the proposal of Plan Ecuador, which seeks to counteract the damaging effects of Plan Colombia [the joint U.S.-Colombian effort against terrorism]."

Where do Bolivia and Nicaragua fit into this collaborative effort? An Oct. 4 letter from a rebel to FARC leader Marulanda reports that a Venezuelan minister has agreed that if there is a FARC summit, "Ch?vez would come with Ortega, Evo and Correa." All three, the letter said, are with Ch?vez to the death.

Write to O'Grady@wsj.com

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120510858118323265.html?mod=djemEditorialPage


2467
3DHS / The Faces of the enemy. (2)
« on: March 09, 2008, 11:30:32 PM »
Jemaah Islamiyah is an Islamist terrorist group that seeks to establish a pan-Islamic state across Southeast Asia. Jemaah Islamiyah is most active in Indonesia and the Philippines, but is also believed to conduct operations in Thailand, Singapore, and Malaysia. The terror group is al Qaeda?s regional affiliate in Southeast Asia and its operatives have been responsible for devastating attacks in the region, including the 2002 and 2005 Bali bombings, the 2004 suicide car bombing outside the Australian Embassy in Jakarta, the August 2003 car bombing of the JW Marriott hotel in Jakarta, and a series of bombings in Manila.

This photo presentation will look at the major leaders and operatives in the Southeast Asian terror group.

Click link below:

http://www.longwarjournal.org/multimedia/JI-Leaders-Jan2008/index.html



2468



OBAMA SLAYS HIS 'MONSTER' - AIDE WHO SLIMED HILL QUITS & SAYS SORRY
By MAGGIE HABERMAN
March 8, 2008

March 8, 2008

A top foreign policy adviser to Barack Obama resigned yesterday after calling Hillary Rodham
Clinton "a monster."


Samantha Power, a Pulitzer Prize-winning author and Harvard prof who posed last summer for a glamorous
pictorial in Vogue, came under fire after firing off the insult. She further embarrassed Obama by saying
his plan to withdraw from Iraq could become inoperative if he wins the White House.


Discussing Clinton, Power told The Scotsman newspaper: "She is a monster, too - that is off the record -
she is stooping to anything."

On Thursday night, Obama's camp issued a statement from Power apologizing and Obama denounced the "monster" remark.

Power told RTE, Ireland's public broadcast service, that she spoke with Obama by phone yesterday and he "made it
absolutely clear that we just couldn't make comments like this in his campaign." Clinton supporters had demanded
that she be axed
.

Power announced she was resigning just as word circulated about a BBC interview where she said Obama's
call to pull all US troops from Iraq within 16 months is a "best-case scenario" that he'd look at again if elected
.

"You can't make a commitment in March 2008 about what circumstances will be like in January of 2009," she said.

"He will, of course, not rely on some plan that he's crafted as a presidential candidate or a US senator.

"He will rely upon a plan - an operational plan - that he pulls together in consultation with people who are on the
ground to whom he doesn't have daily access now, as a result of not being the president."

In her announcement that she's resigning her unpaid post, Power called her remarks about Clinton "inexcusable"
and contrary to her admiration for the former first lady.

Power didn't address her Iraq comments.

Obama campaign manager David Plouffe insisted that the candidate's plan to pull back roughly two brigades
a month as president is "a rock-solid commitment."

But it followed a flap over a Canadian government memo that pointed to double dealing by Obama's top economic
adviser, Austan Goolsbee.

According to the memo, Goolsbee privately told Canadian government officials that Obama's talk about renegotiating
the North American Free Trade Agreement was "political positioning."

Goolsbee has denied the remarks.

Clinton, stumping in Mississippi, said her rival "keeps telling people one thing, while his campaign tells people
abroad something else. I'm not sure what the American people should believe."

She added, "He has attacked me continuously for having no hard exit date [from Iraq], and now we learn
he doesn't have one
. In fact, he doesn't have a plan at all."

Obama shot back, "She doesn't have the standing to question my position on this issue.

"It was because of George Bush, with an assist from Hillary Clinton and John McCain, that we got into this war . . .
I will end it in 2009."

Power is an expert on human rights, having written several books and articles on issues like the crisis in Darfour.

A graduate of Yale University and Harvard law school, she moved to the United States from Ireland at age 9.

Power is reportedly close to Cass Sunstein, a University of Chicago law professor who has close ties with Obama
and may be tapped as a possible adviser or White House counsel.

http://www.nypost.com/seven/03082008/news/nationalnews/obama_slays_his_monster_100949.htm






2469
How ironic ::)

Sonora, Mexico officials slam sanctions law in Tucson visit
SHERYL KORNMAN
Published: 01.16.2008

A delegation of nine state legislators from Sonora, Mexico was in Tucson on Tuesday to say Arizona's
new employer sanctions law will have a devastating effect on the Mexican state.

At a news conference, the legislators said Sonora - Arizona's southern neighbor, made up of mostly small towns - cannot handle the demand for housing, jobs and schools it will face as illegal Mexican workers here return to their hometowns without jobs or money.

The law, which took effect Jan.1, punishes employers who knowingly hire individuals who don't have valid legal documents to work in the United States. Penalties include suspension or loss of a business license.

Its intent is to eliminate or curtail the top draw for immigrants to this country - jobs.

The Mexican delegation, members of Sonora's 58th Legislature, belong to the National Action Party (PAN), the party of Mexico's president, Felipe Caldern.

They spoke at the offices of Project PPEP, a nonprofit that provides job retraining for farmworkers and other programs.

The lawmakers were to travel to Phoenix for a Wednesday breakfast meeting with Hispanic legislators.

They want to tell them how the law will affect Mexican families on both sides of the border.

"How can they pass a law like this?" asked Mexican Rep. Leticia Amparano Gamez, who represents Nogales.

"There is not one person living in Sonora who does not have a friend or relative working in Arizona," she said in Spanish.

"Mexico is not prepared for this, for the tremendous problems" it will face as more and more Mexicans working in Arizona and sending money to their families return to hometowns in Sonora without jobs, she said.

"We are one family, socially and economically," she said of the people of Sonora and Arizona.

Amparano said the Mexican legislators are already asking the federal government of Mexico for help for Sonora.

Rep. Florencio Diaz Armenta, coordinator of the delegation, represents San Luis, south of Yuma, one of Arizona's agricultural hubs, which employs some 28,000 legal Mexican workers.

"What do we do with the repatriated?" he asked. "As Mexicans, we are worried. They are Mexicans but they are also people - fathers and mothers and young people with jobs" who won't have work in Sonora."

He said the Arizona law will lead to "disintegration of the family," as one "legal" Mexican parent remains in Arizona and the other returns to Mexico.

Rep. Francisco Garcia G?mez, a legislator from Cananea and that city's former mayor, said the lack of mining jobs there has driven many Mexicans to Arizona to find work. He said they depend on jobs in Arizona to feed their families on both sides of the border.

Gov. Janet Napolitano, in her State of the State speech Monday, said the new law needs some modifications, including a better definition of what constitutes a complaint.

Barrett Marson, director of communications for the Arizona House of Representatives, said Speaker Jim Weiers, R-Phoenix, "has some concerns about how the law will be administered and applied."

He said the speaker sought testimony from the business community last fall "to get ideas about how to make following the law easier. In the end, that's what he wants - compliance, but make it as easy as possible to do."

Marson said Weiers is "waiting for the governor to come out with her idea of what she wants to do" before he makes his own recommendations.

http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/altss/printstory/border/74193

2470


Latinos Seek Citizenship in Time for Voting
By JULIA PRESTON

March 7, 2008

A lawsuit filed Thursday in a federal court in New York by Latino immigrants seeks to force immigration authorities to complete hundreds of thousands of stalled naturalization petitions in time for the new citizens to vote in November.

The class-action suit was brought by the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund on behalf of legal Hispanic immigrants in the New York City area who are eager to vote and have been waiting for years for the federal Citizenship and Immigration Services agency to finish their applications. The suit demands that the agency meet a nationwide deadline of Sept. 22 to complete any naturalization petitions filed by March 26.

Latino groups hope to summon the clout of the federal courts to compel the Bush administration to reduce a backlog of citizenship applications that swelled last year. According to the Migration Policy Institute, a nonpartisan research group in Washington, more than one million citizenship petitions were backed up in the pipeline by the end of December, the majority from Latino immigrants.

Despite protests over the delays from lawmakers, Latino groups and immigrant advocates, the immigration agency is currently projecting wait times of 16 months to 18 months to process the petitions.

?The reality is that large numbers of Latinos will not be able to vote in the elections because of these delays,? said Cesar A. Perales, president of the defense fund. ?Now the world will know that the Latino community expects the Bush administration to get this done on time.?

Christopher S. Bentley, a spokesman for Citizenship and Immigration Services, said he could not comment on pending litigation.

?Our commitment is to work through the naturalization applications as quickly as we can without compromising the security and integrity of the process,? Mr. Bentley said.

The lawsuit, filed in the Southern District of New York, asserts that the agency violated immigrants? due process rights by routinely failing to finish their applications within a 180-day time period that Congress has set as a standard. It also asserts that the Bush administration did not follow regulatory procedures in November 2002 when it ordered the Federal Bureau of Investigation to deepen its background checks of citizenship applicants.

Foster Maer, a lawyer for the defense fund, said it would soon file motions asking the court to order the agency immediately to meet the September deadline, which is intended to leave new citizens time to register to vote.

Manuel Martinez, 35, a legal immigrant from Mexico who is a plaintiff in the suit, filed his petition in January 2006. It has been delayed because the F.B.I. has not completed the required background check, he said. He said he suspected the problem was that he has a common Hispanic name.

?I want to be a citizen yesterday, not tomorrow,? said Mr. Martinez, who has lived in the United States since 1990. ?I am really worried about the economy, and the deficit is too much. I need to vote.?

A fee increase, raising naturalization costs 80 percent to $595, went into effect on July 30. Legal immigrants were also spurred to seek citizenship by worries about the divisive debate over immigration and by citizenship campaigns by Latino groups.

?It is astonishing the government should be so unresponsive to immigrants who have enthusiastically taken all the steps to become Americans,? said Janet Murgu?a, president of the National Council of La Raza, a Latino group that supported the suit.


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/07/us/07immig.html?ei=5065&en=58025c09bf987fad&ex=1205557200&partner=MYWAY&pagewanted=print

2471
3DHS / Chavez support slips in Venezuela
« on: March 06, 2008, 02:38:41 PM »
Chavez support slips in Venezuela
Food shortages and rising prices are eroding the leftist leader's approval ratings.
By Sara Miller Llana 
March 7, 2008


Caracas, Venezuela - Petare is a sprawling hillside barrio in Caracas, and poor neighborhoods like this have long been epicenters of support for Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez.

Yet when a candidate from a opposition party launched his mayoral bid here recently, residents greeted him with honking horns and enthusiastic handshakes.

"I used to believe in [Mr. Chavez], when I still believed he'd do what he promised," says Norelys Rangel, a lifelong resident here. Instead, she says, she often can't find milk or rice. In fact, she says, life has gotten harder.

Petare and other neighborhoods like it are still very much Chavez territory, but signs of his waning support in those areas highlights a broader trend. Despite the country's vast oil wealth and near record oil prices, Venezuelans are complaining about product shortages, crime, and high inflation.

Many also say the president too often meddles in international affairs while problems mount at home. For them, Chavez's move this week to deploy troops to the border with Colombia which is slowing the flow of key goods during milk and meat shortages is a case in point.

It all adds up to a key question: Will Chavez be able to ride out this political storm or is waning enthusiasm irreversible?

"I think he has a chance; I don't think it's easy," says Daniel Hellinger, a Latin America expert at Webster University in St. Louis. "He has to somehow overcome the administrative inefficiencies and corruption in the ranks of government itself. Governance is the key for this current year. He has to show progress."

So far he seems to be placing his attention elsewhere.

Chavez's role in regional crisis

He has taken center stage in the regional crisis that erupted this week after Colombia's military launched an airstrike against leftist rebels based in Ecuador, killing a top leader of the Armed Revolutionary Forces of Colombia (FARC). Chavez whom Colombia accuses of supporting the rebels threatened war if Colombia were to pursue rebels on Venezuelan soil and has since sent 9,000 troops to the border. The trading relationship between the two is valued at $5 billion a year, and Colombia is a top supplier of food to Venezuela.

"What he is doing is what semi-authoritarian leaders often do: saber-rattling to distract their people's attention from inflation or food shortages," says Riordan Roett, director of the Latin American Studies Program at Johns Hopkins University's School for Advanced International Studies in Washington.

But it could backfire. Chavez's first blow came in December, when voters rejected a constitutional referendum that included 69 amendments ranging from reducing the workweek to eliminating term limits for presidents. It was his first defeat after a long winning streak for the former military officer.

Since then he has called for a year of "revision, rectification, and relaunching." William Izarra, a retired Air Force officer and chief ideologue in the Chavez movement, runs workshops throughout Venezuela to teach the values of "21st century socialism." "Our goal is to convince people that the government is on the right track," he says, "and from what I've seen, President Chavez has total support from the bases of the movement."

Indeed, his most resolute supporters still see little fault in a leader who has poured billions of dollars into social programs, called misiones, which have given the poor access to college degrees, literacy programs, food kitchens, and medical care. Maria Garcia, for example, is a lifelong resident of Petare who studied for the first time in her life through Mision Ribas. "I think we have the best president in the world," she says.

But that staunch support is increasingly less widespread. Ana Rodriguez, who has a 3-year-old son, stands in a line wrapping around the corner of a grocery store waiting for milk ? one of many products increasingly hard to find.

The government claims that opposition store owners have hoarded products to undermine the government, but critics say that price controls have taxed producers, leaving them with little incentive. Ms. Rodriguez says she does not understand the complexities of the situation, but sees one offender: "It's the government's fault."

Residents worry about their safety ? Caracas suffers the reputation of being one of the most dangerous cities in Latin America and the high cost of living. There are fears that the new currency, the "strong Bolivar," will be devalued, giving rise to a black market where dollars are traded for well over the official rate of 2.1 to 1.

Colombia spat may add to woes

The dispute with Colombia could add to his troubles: Colombia officials claim that a laptop owned by slain leader Raul Reyes shows evidence that Venezuela gave $300 million to the FARC. Chavez has rejected that claim.

Chavez's approval has slipped, according to some polls published in the local media, to 40 percent from 60 percent two years ago.

His government faces a pivotal moment during mayoral and gubernatorial elections in November.

"Usually there is an erosion of enthusiasm for anyone that's been in power for so long. I wouldn't see it as a sign of upcoming defeat for Chavez," says Steve Ellner, a Venezuela-based author of "Rethinking Venezuelan Politics: Class, Conflict, and the Chavez Phenomenon." "But the Chavez movement is particularly weak at the local and statewide level."

William Ojeda, the opposition leader who launched the mayoral bid in Petare, lost this race before. But he claims that "Chavista" sentiment has been so dampened here that he has a new chance. "There is a rejection of this centralized power," he says. "We want a country with pluralism, development, and prosperity."

That is why Ms. Rangel says she attended his opposition rally in her neighborhood plagued by poverty after years of supporting Chavez. She says she is anxious for change, adding that she's not the only one: "I don't think Ch?vez is sleeping as well at night as he used to."

Daniel Cancel contributed from Caracas.


http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0307/p06s01-woam.html

2472
3DHS / Democrats scramble to avoid party split
« on: March 06, 2008, 11:18:57 AM »
Democrats fear an ugly end to race

By Peter Nicholas
Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
March 6, 2008

WASHINGTON -- Leading Democrats scrambled Wednesday to prevent the closest, most riveting presidential contest in decades from tearing the party apart, as the odds rose that neither Hillary Rodham Clinton nor Barack Obama could clinch the nomination without angering large blocs of voters.

Anxiety within the party swelled after Clinton's victories Tuesday staved off elimination and gave her fresh momentum, yet did little to eat into Obama's lead among delegates -- the people who will formally pick the nominee at the Democratic National Convention in August.
 
Clinton trails Obama by 105 delegates after netting about a dozen more than he did Tuesday, Associated Press totals show. To make up the gap, the Clinton campaign has pushed to seat delegates from Michigan and Florida -- two states sidelined for violating party rules. Obama did not campaign in either state, though an ad of his aired in Florida. He was not on the ballot in Michigan.

The Michigan Democratic Party said it was in negotiations with its counterpart in Florida, with the Clinton and Obama campaigns, and with the national party over the seating of delegates from the two states.

Democratic members of the Florida and Michigan congressional delegations met on Capitol Hill on Wednesday evening to discuss how to proceed, amid concerns that constituencies such as black voters could be alienated if a solution wasn't reached.

Rep. Kendrick B. Meek (D-Fla.), before heading into the session, said: "Every day that goes by, the harder this process is going to get as it relates to Florida and Michigan. . . . That's one of the reasons we're meeting."

Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) is drafting a letter to Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean asking him to seat the Florida delegates or to open the party's coffers to pay for another election.

Dan McLaughlin, a Nelson spokesman, said it was vital that two of the largest states in the country had a voice in the selection. "Before a final decision can be made on a nominee by the Democratic Party, you have to hear from the people in those two big states," he said.

Frustrated by the impasse, two prominent Clinton supporters said the only fair resolution might be to place both Clinton and Obama on the ticket, though one would have to renounce presidential ambitions and stand for vice president. Thus far, neither has shown any interest in the No. 2 job.

Clinton seemed to open the door to what some Democrats have called a "dream ticket," telling a CBS morning program, "That may be where this is headed." She suggested that she would take the top slot. Obama did not rule out the possibility, but said, "I think it is very premature to start talking about a joint ticket."

With the next big showdown coming April 22 in Pennsylvania, some party leaders foresee an outcome that could anger core Democratic constituencies. One reason has to do with math.

Even if she strings together victory after victory in the coming months, Clinton is not likely to net enough delegates to draw even with Obama. That is because party rules award delegates proportionally according to vote totals. So even the loser in any given contest can pick up a respectable number of delegates.

Clinton would get a dramatic boost if the Michigan and Florida results counted toward her total. By some estimates, she would net about 120 delegates based on her strong victories in the two states. Yet that strategy is a risky one.

Last year, the Democratic Party stripped Florida and Michigan of their delegates as punishment for violating a rule forbidding states to leapfrog one another in the election calendar.

At one point, Clinton seemed to accept the outcome.

In an interview the New York senator gave in October, she said of the Michigan primary, at that point three months away: "You know, it's clear this election they're having isn't going to count for anything."

If black voters who have supported Obama think he lost the nomination because the rules of the contest were unfairly changed, the backlash could be damaging, some civil rights activists said.

"You would be changing the rules after you've had the contest," the Rev. Al Sharpton said. "In Michigan, Obama's name wasn't even on the ballot. Clearly, if the name of the candidate who's getting the African American vote isn't on the ballot, that encourages many to stay home. . . . It would be a tremendous insult to the voters of this country."

An Obama victory could split the party in a different way. Like Clinton, the Illinois senator is likely to need the votes of Democratic superdelegates -- party activists and elected officials who are free to back any candidate. Suspicion among Clinton voters that Obama courted superdelegates through backroom deals could upset female and Latino voters loyal to the former first lady.

For now, the party's focus seems to be Florida and Michigan. Some leading Democrats would like to see another election in those states or perhaps a compromise.

"The only way you could make it work is if both candidates agree on how to divide up those two delegations," said Leon Panetta, a Clinton supporter who was chief of staff in Bill Clinton's White House. "Both campaigns would have to agree on a formula. On the other hand, if it's a fight -- and let's assume Hillary should win -- [Obama supporters] will be very angry that somehow they were robbed."

Panetta said a better solution might be a shared ticket. Former Sen. Bob Kerrey of Nebraska, another Clinton supporter, also said the two should consider joining forces.

"To me that's the most logical option, the easiest one to figure out," he said. "They didn't get in this thing to beat each other. They got into this to beat the Republican nominee."

"Ultimately," Panetta said, "whoever loses will have to lose with grace -- and that may very well mean they should join the ticket in order to ensure the party is unified coming out of the convention."

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-delegates6mar06,0,7199969.story

2473
3DHS / There is trouble in Mullah land. The world is passing them by!
« on: March 05, 2008, 07:53:59 PM »
Iran's recent student protests have become too large
and too public for the regime to conceal
.

March 5, 2008

Ardeshir Arian reports, with videos.

By Ardeshir Arian

For nearly two weeks, Shiraz University in central Iran has been paralyzed by a student demonstration that refuses to die and appears to be encouraging an atmosphere of protest on campuses around the country.

The protests began on February 24, when more than 500 students in Shiraz University marched from their dormitories into the main campus and demonstrated against the school?s chancellor Mohammed Hadi Sedeghi, demanding that he resign. The angry protests have taken place daily ever since.

In another country, angry student protesters might be considered a campus matter and wouldn't necessarily have national significance, but the Shiraz students rising up and rebelling against Sadeghi, a former Revolutionary Guard Corps commander who was personally appointed by Mahmoud Ahmedinejad in an effort to crack down on campuses and rid them of non-Islamic influences, has wider implications. Sadeghi is clearly a political figure and an Ahmedinejad ally ? he was in charge of the upcoming parliamentary election committee in the province of Fars.

The angry students are chafing at the restrictive environment on campus in which campus guards are permitted to enter their dorm rooms without any prior warning. Students believe Sadeghi manipulated the internal election of the university council, rejecting 108 student candidates, which resulted in banning them from entering the race and imposing extreme limitations on student print media and activities. There is also general unhappiness with their food and housing, and underlying the action there is general discontent. Fliers distributed among the students are claiming that Sadeghi embezzled approximately $22 million following the sale of a university building.

It isn't the first protest against the unpopular chancellor. Last April, students protested against a tightened dress code which included huge bulletin boards at the school's male dormitories with a statement ordering male students not to wear "shorts and tank tops in the dormitory's halls" or where they sleep.

From the moment the protests first broke out, government security agents were keeping tabs on the students as they marched towards the chancellor?s office chanting: "This is the final message, the student movement is ready for insurrection, The movement continues, even if bullets come, "Resign, resign," "Freedom of the print media," "Long live freedom," "Support the noble nation, support, support, and They close the nuclear file, but where are the students files? "protesting jailed students that are missing since the time of their arrests, without any news or closure of their uncertain situation.

The campus was shut, but citizens gathered at the gates of the university to watch the students protest among them, faculty members and other university employees.

On that first day of demonstrations, Sadeghi managed to quietly slip away from campus. Demonstrators rushed in his direction to capture him, but the campus police prevented them from reaching him. After his departure from campus, students occupied his office and vowed to sit in until he resigned.

After, agents of the IRI, employed by the university, blocked the main gates of the campus and parked buses at the entrance to prevent the outsiders from entering the campus and to contain the demonstrations within. Islamic security forces stood at the gates preventing any contact between the students and the people.

Naturally, little has been heard of the student uprising on official Iranian media. But Radio Farda, a Persian-language, 24/7 radio service financed by the U.S., interviewed some of the demonstrators inside the campus. Its reports have been translated by Radio Free Europe:

Student Mohammad Mehdi Ahmadi complained to Radio Farda on February 26 of ?pressures? the university chief, whom he identified as Dr. Sadeqi, was imposing on the campus. He said these included the disqualification of 108 students who had sought to run for seats in a student council, the expulsion of various students from dormitories, the closure or evacuation of dormitories for married students, and pressures on student journals and activists. ?These all became a trigger for the ? protests,? he said.
As the protest has continued, the numbers of students has grown into the thousands, organizers say, despite attempts to break it up by the authorities, with actions such as shutting down the main water lines into the student dormitories.

Among the student chants: ?Sadeghi, the Pinochet, Resign, Resign,? and ?This is our last warning, the student movement is ready to rise up.?

Multiple YouTube videos have been posted, including those showing students marching and chanting "The noble people, we are ready, we are ready". As they gathered on the steps of the administration building, they chanted "The noble people, support, support? and ?Freedom and justice is the remedy for our people?s pain. There was also repeated chanting of Resign, resign, we don't want a corrupt chancellor," "This is our last warning, students movement is alive", or We don't want a Pasdar [a member of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps] as our chancellor.

The pro-government, pro-Sagedhi point of view has not gone unrepresented at the protests, but is not very popular.

At one point, a student took the microphone and said: ?Since the western media is reporting about your demonstration, then you are being supported by the United States.? Other students booed him and took the mic back from him.

Another representative of the dean claimed that the embattled administrator was ready to answer students questions in the auditorium, but the students shot back that the only thing that he can do is resign. There is nothing to be said between us.

As the protests entered their second week on Monday, Iranian secret police reportedly began to take more aggressive action to end the embarrassing incident. Ten student leaders have been contacted and threatened. About 25 families of the striking students have been contacted by the campus agents, pressured, threatened, and forced to get in touch with their children and ask them to call off the protest. Eight students have been named and summoned to the revolutionary court to answer for their conduct.

The student protest movement appears to be widening. There is news that students of another higher educational institution in the city of Shahroud, in the province of Khorasan, more than a thousand kilometers away, have followed suit and some students have been arrested by the secret police.

According to Radio Free Europe: Citing unnamed activists, Radio Farda reported other ongoing protests or sit-ins in Shahrud University in northeastern Iran and the Teacher Training University in Tehran. Ahmadi told Radio Farda that specific issues were merely triggers for protests in Iran?s increasingly restricted campuses. The atmosphere the government has created in universities is [one] of protest, and the slightest issue can trigger large protests, he said.

On Wednesday, reports emerged that the student unrest had made it to Iran's capital: between 100 and 200 students at Allameh Tabatabai Univeristy in Tehran protested against the banning of 40 student leaders who had organized a demonstration against the authorities.

An Iranian activist website also reported that:

Students of Bahonar College held an angry demonstration over a fellow student beaten up by the chief of the school's security. They shouted: ?University is not a military garrison.

Ardeshir Arian is a special correspondent; he covers Iranian affairs.

http://pajamasmedia.com/2008/03/angry_iranian_students_rebel_a.php

2474
3DHS / This Michelle Obama is going to be fun
« on: March 05, 2008, 04:18:11 PM »
Michelle Obama: America is "Just Downright Mean"
By Noel Sheppard | March 5, 2008
 
As NewsBusters previously reported, the wife of Democrat presidential candidate Barack Obama isn't very proud of her country.

Two weeks after making her disdain for the nation clear during a campaign speech for her husband in Wisconsin, Michelle further debased America by saying that we're a country that is "just downright mean."

Given how media made excuses for her comments in Wisconsin, it will be quite interesting to see just how much of her interview in the March 10th edition of The New Yorker will be reported in the next 24 hours (emphasis added throughout, h/t JWF):

Obama begins with a broad assessment of life in America in 2008, and life is not good: we're a divided country, we're a country that is "just downright mean," we are "guided by fear," we're a nation of cynics, sloths, and complacents. "We have become a nation of struggling folks who are barely making it every day," she said, as heads bobbed in the pews. "Folks are just jammed up, and it's gotten worse over my lifetime. And, doggone it, I'm young. Forty-four!"

Oh, woe is her! Just listen to how deluded this person is:

"You're looking at a young couple that's just a few years out of debt," Obama said. "See, because, we went to those good schools, and we didn't have trust funds. I'm still waiting for Barack's trust fund. Especially after I heard that Dick Cheney was s'posed to be a relative or something. Give us something here!"

Give us something here?

Can you believe this nonsense? You want to know how much this couple has been given lately?

The Obamas' financial standing has risen sharply in the past three years, largely as a result of the money Barack earned from writing "The Audacity of Hope." In 2005, their income was $1.67 million, which was more than they had earned in the previous seven years combined.

Just after Barack was elected to the United States Senate, Michelle received a large pay increase-from $121,910 in 2004 to $316,962 in 2005.

Still want someone to give you something, Michelle?

But that's just the beginning of an hypocrisy an honest media would be all over if her husband was a Republican:

"The life that I'm talking about that most people are living has gotten progressively worse since I was a little girl. . . . So if you want to pretend like there was some point over the last couple of decades when your lives were easy, I want to meet you!"

Really, Michelle? Life has gotten worse for you since you were a little girl? Not according to The New Yorker:

Money was scarce but sufficient. Fraser [her father] took pride in providing for his family. "If the TV broke and we didn't have any money to have it fixed, we could go out and buy another one on a charge card, as long as we paid the bills on time," Marian [her mother] told me. Saturday nights were spent at home playing Chinese checkers, Monopoly, or a game called Hands Down (like spoons, with bluffing). It was a simple time. "I probably had two sleepovers my entire life," Craig [her brother] said. "We were home folks." Many years, the family drove to Dukes Happy Holiday Resort, in Michigan, for a week's vacation.

Compare this to her life today:

The Obamas employ a full-time housekeeper, and Michelle tries to see a personal trainer four times a week.

Woe is you, Michelle.

*****Update: To give readers an idea of the delusion involved in this woman's declarations concerning how things were better when she was a little girl, let's understand that in the year she was born (1964), 19 percent of the population lived in poverty. In 2006, that percentage is 12.3.

You were saying, Michelle?

Of course, it would be nice if media called her out on this nonsense, wouldn't it?


http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2008/03/05/michelle-obama-america-just-downright-mean

2475
3DHS / Hillary kicks ass, this is funny
« on: March 05, 2008, 09:45:58 AM »
Wow
Hillary survives!
I am all over the map
When I voted I voted for Obama
But now I am glad Hillary won
Rush has a point
Keep the enemy fighting among themselves
The longer the better

What a dilemma:

Obama nice guy, but super super liberal
Obama is way to the Left of the American public
But the "Obama Trojan Horse" probably wins easily in Nov
Obama vs. an old, looks like hell, horrible boring speaker? come on
Obama would be a disaster, but such a disaster he'd be one term
Lani Guinier's would be commonplace
such a disaster Repubs would retake Congress at mid-term
such a disaster many dems would help block his far left agenda

Hillary, easy to dislike, high negatives
McCain would have better chance to defeat
But would not be the disaster for the country Obama would be
Probably would be much more effective than Obama at getting agenda passed

it's hard to decide
go for the Obama trainwreck knowing it won't last
or go for the liberal but realistic Hillary

i honestly don't know who is the lesser of two evils: Hellary or Barack Hussein Obama




Pages: 1 ... 163 164 [165] 166 167 ... 178