DebateGate

You're right, I don't know Bo.  Do you?

Brilliant rebuttal.  Completely meaningless, but the consistency is one to marvel

As much as Clinton and her coolaide contingent would hav eus believe, its not "e-mail", as if she's being investigated by the FBI for emialing someone about her Yoga routine.  It's been 1st and formost her illegal server to begin with.  Add to that the classified e-mails that should have never been on it.  Add to that her lying about sending and receving classified e-mails on her unlawwful unsecured private server.  Add to that the attempt to destroy the e-mails in the face of a congressional subpoena and bleach bit the server for good measure, all demonstrating an overt INTENT to deceve & obstruct, 1st Congress, then the FBI. 

You have no fricken clue what e-mails have likely compromised our national security, so the ongoing claims that this is no big thing, fall only on ignorant ears

misguided and overtly biased partisan opinion, duly noted

Obama, Clinton, and the Democrats are already well underway at establishing "the new normal" (the PC version of destroying "mu" country)

Did you also catch the warning the Justice Dept has communicated?...anyone found trying to establish/prove voter fraud during the election, can be arrested.  This of course is the same Justice Dept that had no problem with Black Panthers standing outside of voting/polling stations

shhhhhhhhhhh.............doncha know the more important point is that these e-mails were illegally obtained?  sheeesh

So possible to start a path down the dark side, but not set in stone.  I'll take quality over quantity, every time.....especially if the option is a few highly qualified principled folk, over a mass of easily swayed, corruptable folk

My full disclosure idea is sounding better all the time now