Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - sirs

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 100
1
3DHS / Fear Mongering 101.....the left's calling card
« on: March 21, 2017, 07:55:10 PM »
When you listen to leftist pundits & politicians like NY Mayor DeBlasio or CA congresscritter De Leon, you'd think they were preparing their constituencies for some SWAT-like round-up of anyone, including infant children, here illegally.  Criticizing acts not just not happeneing, but at no time ever advocated as pending policy.

Thus their efforts to adopt actual legal sanctuary city or even sanctuary state jargon....to "protect" those poor defenseless children, just trying to leave school to get home to their mothers

Where the hell is the media to pounce on these politicans on where they're coming up with such fear pushing rhetoric??

2
3DHS / The CBO "issue"....
« on: March 19, 2017, 05:10:39 PM »
Of course the Democrats are pouncing on the CBO report, proclaiming how so may are going to "lose" their coverage under the pending GOP legislation of replacement.  Just a few points of contention

a) despite initial claims, by no other than Pelosi no less, it would seem that "success" of Obamacare is simply how many people are insured, not the quality of that care or the skyrocketing premiums

b) the CBO report doesn't (actually can't until its actually in place) acknowledge the massive cost savings that would occur when individuals can actually purchase their healthcare insurance across state lines

c) and lastly, and for me, most importantly, the reason for such a proclamation that people will "lose" their coverage, is that the mandate that they MUST LEGALLY have insurance, or be deemed out of compliance, and literally be penalized under Obamacare, is removed....as in people that have "lost" their coverage, never actually lost it, they're simply no longer added by the CBO as going to have been mandated to have it.

I'm still no fan of the plan, as the Government still has too many fingers in the broth, but at the very least, the freedom to choose and access what people want, and don't want, will be back in play again

3
3DHS / "I'm not a lawyer, but I play one in debate forums"
« on: March 16, 2017, 03:55:44 AM »
Now...about this latest Hawaiian Judge to squelch Trump's latest EO regarding a TEMPORARY travel ban from just a FEW countries, that are predominantly Muslim.....This ruling is wrong, on so many levels.  The jist of the ruling is that the Judge proclaims that although there's no actual language that specifcally bans anyone based on their religion, the apparent jist of the EO does indeed apparently ban folks from entering this country, based on their religion. 

Let's put away the Trump hatred mindset for a few moments and deal with present Constitutional guidelines and legal precedent. 

1) Let's pretend that the Judge is exactly correct....that he was able to read the mind of Trump, and ascertain the REAL reason for the EO, that of banning Muslims from entering this country, simply because they're Muslim.  Guess what.....the Constitution gives him precisely that authority.  Constitutional protections, which includes religious protections, ONLY APPLIES TO AMERICANS, AS IN LEGAL CITIZENS OF THIS COUNTRY.  It does NOT apply to ANYONE NOT of this country, which includes ANY person, or ANY religion.  That's egregious error #1

2) The Judge even concedes that there is no language that specifically bans anyone from this country, based on their religion.  However the Judge apparently knows how nefarious Trump is, and has decided to read into the EO, something that simply isn't there.  A gross overstepping of Judicial authority.  That's egregious error #2

3) If this was a supposed ban on all Muslims, it would have included ALL Muslim countries, and not just those that just happen to also be designated terrorist havens/training grounds, by the PREVIOUS Administration  Egregious error #3

4) Lastly, we have PRECEDENT....as in previous presidents have performed precisely that, which Trump is trying to do...impose a TEMPORARY BAN on specific locations, as in countries, NOT religions.  Jimmy Carter imposed a ban on Iranian immigrants.  Where was the outrage??  The beloved FDR, one of the Left's icons, imposed a ban on even Jewish refugees, for fear of Nazi spies hiding among them.  Fricken error #4

4
3DHS / Professor Ryan
« on: March 09, 2017, 02:29:05 PM »
Class is in

Hate it, or hate it more, at least the GOP is up front in trying to explain the legislation, vs Peolosi's tactic of ramming it down our throats to "see what's in it"

5
3DHS / Merry Christmas......Live Long & Prosper
« on: December 25, 2016, 03:11:00 PM »

6
Not counting the ridicuolus reporting by the media of how so much "disarray" his transition team has supposedly been in....but actual words by him
- global warming
- Obamacare
- no longer going to push to fully investigate Clinton & her Foundation

7
3DHS / I hope xo is doing OK
« on: November 22, 2016, 07:00:21 PM »
I'm sure Clinton's defeat, or more likely, Trump's win, had to come to a huge blow, given how dead set sure he was, that he'd lose big time.  Here's hoping all is ok, that he's not one of the rioters, and that when he's recovered, he may again venture into the saloon

8
3DHS / Quite the Democratic hutzpah
« on: November 19, 2016, 05:49:37 PM »
It's bad enough the lectures we got about peacefully accepting the election outcome (unless of course your horse doesn't win, then its ok for riots & mass protesting), but apparently a NY Democrat congress critter, by the name of Murphy, believes that President-elect Trump should nominate Clinton for UN Secretary.

Seriously, that's what she is advocating.

Clinton operated an unauthorized and unsecure server while serving as secretary of state. She said it was approved by the State Department, she lied.  She said no classified information was sent through the server, which was also a lie.  She continued to email classified information after leaving the State Department.  She was the subject of an FBI investigation while running for president.  It was an unprecedented email system that ignored federal regulations concerning preserving communications of government officials, with an active effort to destroy said comunications, in the face of a Congresional subpoena.  And we want this person back in government?  I don't think so

9
3DHS / Notice the standard hissyfit the left is pulling....
« on: November 09, 2016, 06:29:39 PM »
Clinton lost, not because she's a horrible candidate with no credible accomplishments, not because she was an extension of the Obama policies that the electorate was fed up with, but because she was completely untrustworty when it came to national security....no she lost, because the country is just a bunch of stupid, ignorant, bigoted, woman haters

10
3DHS / Who should be the top 3 choices to replace SoS John Kerry?
« on: November 09, 2016, 04:48:19 PM »
1st name that comes to mind is John Bolton.  I sense he'd be a perfect voice to a Trump Administration.  Any other good prospects?

11
3DHS / Who should be the top 3 choices to replace AG Loretta Lynch?
« on: November 09, 2016, 01:25:20 PM »
The EPA & Justice departments appear to hold the biggest stench of swamp-like corruption.  Who should be considered to lead the dept and the draining of the swamp?

12
3DHS / How's this for product placement?
« on: November 03, 2016, 03:39:52 PM »
....cloth or something



I hear they're running out, fast

13
3DHS / Lost count of the number of smoking guns
« on: November 01, 2016, 06:12:20 PM »
in that mountain of e-mails that the Clinton crew attempted to delete/destroy in the face of a congressional subpoena, is a discovered e-mail where Cheryl Mills (Clinton's personal friend/attorney), immediately informs John Podesta (Clinton's #1 campaign manager) the need to delete the thousands of e-mails presently on the unsecured unlawful private server.

One of these 2 is going to need to fall on Clinton's sword, otherwise this smoking gun will prevent from from doing anything.....even if elected.  Her entire "Presidency" will be impacted by a sitting President, guilty of Federal obstruction

14
3DHS / This just in.....e-mails prove Bush lied about WMD
« on: October 03, 2016, 04:51:05 PM »
What e-mails you say??  The ones deleted right before a congressional investigation into 911......right?

You see, that's why Clinton's active effort to not just delete all her e-mails, but go the extra effort in trying to scrub the servers, is such a corrputing issue.  Let's look at the roles reversed, and then folks like xo can claim how the e-mails are no big deal.

Colin Powell is running for President.  An investigation into 911 faciltiates a subpoena for all his e-mailings while SoS.  Colin insists on providing everything HE deems appropriate to turn over.  And then we find out, right after the subpoena, he and his staff actively deleted thousands of e-mails.  And to top it off, let's say Bush's FBI director, Robert Mueller sends some agents to "talk" to Powell, not write down any transcript of the "talk", and even allow one of his aides, also being investigated, but happens to be an attorney, to be present as well.  And at the end of the day, the FBI decides that Powell didn't intend anything nefarious, although what he did was severely  frowned upon, and Bush's AG, Alberto Gonzalez, following an earlier "spontaneous" meet with former President George HW Bush, on the tarmack of an airport in Texas, decides there's no need to look at this any longer

(Of course, this wouldn't have been the case, since ALL of Powell's direct work while SoS, were conducted on a secured Government server, so Congress DID have all those e-mailings)

But if Powell had done everything as SoS, on a private server, preventing any congressional oversight, xo would be perfectly ok with all that.  Hysterical thought isn't it.  Not only would xo be yelling for Powell to be brought up on charges for detstroying evidence, in the face of a Federal investigation, he'd be proclaiming how this was proof positive that Bush lied about WMD's, and be demanding he be impeached before leaving office

And here's the kicker, I'd be demanding Powell's indictment as well


15
3DHS / Round 1 to Clinton
« on: September 26, 2016, 11:58:32 PM »
Not 1 question on the Clinton Foundation, but several minutes exercised on both the non-existent Birther issue & Trump's tax returns, that neither of which he answered very well

2 incredible opening, literally softball, questions for Trump to hammer Clinton's piss poor judgement and incompetence with national security, via her unsecured e-mail system & subsequent destruction of evidence in the face of a congressional subpoena....and he failed to to get anything of substance started

No wonder Clinton was smiling

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 100