Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - _JS

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 234
31
3DHS / Re: Are Michael Tee and Karl Marx pissed about this?
« on: April 15, 2010, 03:29:54 AM »
Thank you and nice touch with the baseball metaphor.

I am as big a fan of Philistine replies as the next guy, but why not try to reply in a more meaningful manner?

Besides, I don't play for the Liberals or the Conservatives. I think of myself as playing for the men and women who actually do some work for a living.  ;)

32
3DHS / Re: Are Michael Tee and Karl Marx pissed about this?
« on: April 15, 2010, 12:13:52 AM »
From what I have read about Stern, he is neither a socialist nor a communist. Quoting a portion of the final sentence of The Communist Manifesto hardly makes one a Marxist. Moreover, Stern is a major donor to the Democratic Party in the United States, which can best be described as center-left with a left-liberal wing. To answer half of the question posted in the title, Karl Marx cannot possibly be pissed since he is deceased. Were he alive I doubt that he would be angry as much as disappointed in those who would mistake bourgeoisie liberalism for actual scientific socialism. He might refer you to The Critique of the Gotha Program so that you may begin to learn some of the difference.

Now to look at Sirs statement:

Ahh, you gotta love this out.  So, unless a Government is run by a declared Socialist or Communist regime, then any demonstrative hypocrisy by those advocating such a policy, while raking in the big bucks, is merely someone getting "paid for what their worth"

The issue is not about a government being run by a nominal regime of one sort or another. The problem here is a lack of understanding of historical materialism. We live in an era dominated by one class which has in itself a dominant economic, political, and philosophical form:

1. Capitalism
2. Liberal Democracy
3. Postmodernism

Clearly this has not always been the case. Prior to the domination of the bourgeoisie class there was a domination of the elite who ruled through feudalism. At one time the plight of the bourgeoisie certainly seemed as hopeless as the plight of the proletariat today (think about the Thirty Year's War). Regardless, one cannot overcome his or her dominant economic, political, and philosophical movements.

In other words, yes I am a Marxist, but I live in a bourgeoisie time. I have a job that deals with a capitalist world. I exist in a liberal democracy, whether I dislike it matters little. I am surrounded by postmodern thought, again, whether I dislike that matters little. Trying to go through life pretending that those three things are irrelevant would be similar to learning Syriac and only speaking it in the United States in all my interactions.

Luckily, a modern Marxist has great recourse to capitalism, liberal democracy, and postmodernism.

Capitalism offers the opportunity to accumulate vast capital, which funds an endless number of possibilities from charity to education to direct action. Liberalism offers freedom of press, assembly, religion, right to bear arms, and numerous other possibilities which makes revolutionary action possible. Postmodernism offers a life of alienation, destructive individualism, selfishness, and crass consumerism pushing us further towards the collapse of bourgeoisie societies. 

33
3DHS / Re: I just love this image
« on: November 04, 2008, 03:13:47 PM »
They seem to be running low on Palmolive.

I'm just saying.


Cool image :)

34
3DHS / Re: Report clears Palin in Troopergate probe
« on: November 04, 2008, 03:06:16 PM »
What should be remembered is that the Republicans controlled the legislative and executive branches for six of the eight years of the Bush administration. If the Democrats are allowed to hold the same power then they will be judged accordingly.

The Republicans failed on many levels, not just with the American people - but with their own party. They did not control spending, in fact they were far worse than most recent Congresses of either party. The social conservative goals were attained at the executive level mostly. Much of the early energy was spent by Tom DeLay on excluding Democrats from lucrative special interest spending.

The Democrats may do the same thing. If they make it a power issue with the Republicans, then I could very well see them being tossed out quickly. There are too many problems people face right now.

Personally, I expect Unions will see a return of much of the rights they have lost over the years. I'd be sorely disappointed if they are not.

35
3DHS / Re: Obama's Grandmother Dies At Age 86
« on: November 04, 2008, 02:40:31 PM »
*shrug*

I don't think I can stick around and listen to the back and forth bitching and moaning to be honest.

All of the negativity wears thin after a while. Especially when there are a lot of people who need real help out there.

If your favoriate looses will you controll your negativity?

Yes.

Please use this controll in moderation , lest we admire you to death.

Somehow I don't think the risk of that is very high!  ;D

And I can still speak highly of Denmark, so I should be OK.

36
3DHS / Re: Obama's Grandmother Dies At Age 86
« on: November 04, 2008, 01:19:00 PM »
*shrug*

I don't think I can stick around and listen to the back and forth bitching and moaning to be honest.

All of the negativity wears thin after a while. Especially when there are a lot of people who need real help out there.

If your favoriate looses will you controll your negativity?

Yes.

37
3DHS / Re: How Many Laws Can One Break?
« on: November 04, 2008, 01:17:21 PM »
Recently, given the tensions of the election, I think that all of us have been guilty to contributing to the negative atmosphere in here.

No one has a monopoly on "right" or "good." We all need reminding of that sometimes.

38
3DHS / Re: How Many Laws Can One Break?
« on: November 04, 2008, 01:06:14 PM »
I think Bush has been notably good for life issues, with the glaring exception of the death penalty. Otherwise he has been one of the best presidents and few to actually go beyond lip service with regards to abortion and embryonic stem cell research. I find some fault with his view of using warfare, but otherwise his record here has been good.

39
3DHS / Re: Obama's Grandmother Dies At Age 86
« on: November 04, 2008, 12:52:14 PM »
*shrug*

I don't think I can stick around and listen to the back and forth bitching and moaning to be honest.

All of the negativity wears thin after a while. Especially when there are a lot of people who need real help out there.

40
Sports / Re: How 'Bout Them TITANS?
« on: November 04, 2008, 12:48:39 PM »
That was a great game!

I think that they are overachievers, but doing a brilliant job.


Tough loss to the Bengals Rich.

41
3DHS / Re: Obama's Grandmother Dies At Age 86
« on: November 04, 2008, 12:21:46 PM »
Is this really what it is going to be for the next four years?

Hey, I was saying that in 2000. And it lasted 8 years.

So, should it last another 4, 8, or 16 no matter who wins?

It has really gotten ridiculous.

42
3DHS / Re: How Many Laws Can One Break?
« on: November 04, 2008, 12:20:16 PM »
The purpose of my query was not to lock you into a candidate. Obama or McCain, follow your instincts.

My query was more conversational. I know and you know both parties pander to whomever will get them votes.

But I do see a lot of damning of the GOP for their position vis a vis the definition of marriage but i don't see a lot of posting about dems who advocate one thing and then vote in the opposite direction.

And I just wanted to know if you observed the same thing.

Consider it a reality check on my part. Validation of my own observations if you will.

I think part of it has to do with the fact that Republicans used the issue to great effect in 2004 with the notion of a US Constitutional Amendment. It was never going to happen, and anyone who sat down and thought about it understood that, but it worked well to get evangelicals to the polls. Technically speaking, Bush and Kerry had virtually the same policy concerning same-sex marriage - but Bush was held up by the right (fairly or not) as a "defender of marriage."

I completely agree. The Democrats take advantage of that voting block. The truth is that a more libertarian view is the only valid view in my opinion. Homosexuals should be allowed to be married. Why not? The so-called compromises are worse than the ban altogether because they hearken back to the days of "separate but equal."

43
3DHS / Re: Obama's Grandmother Dies At Age 86
« on: November 04, 2008, 12:06:13 PM »
Is this really what it is going to be for the next four years?

44
3DHS / Re: A Joke And What It Reveals
« on: October 31, 2008, 05:34:55 PM »
What I find fascinating about this argument is that it is not in the least bit believable.

If it were coming from a true libertarian, such as Prince, I would most certainly take it to heart. Yet, this argument sprang from conservatives. Even more hypocritical - conservatives supporting Senator McCain.

They speak of government metaphorically holding a gun to a citizen's head to pay taxes, but what of the government literally holding a gun to individual's heads in the form of the Iraq War, police brutality, or the war on drugs?

These are individuals whose political creed supports "separate but equal" (or not even that) for individuals with same sex partners. They typically support the most brutal of all state-held powers: capital punishment.

I don't buy it. The conservatives use libertarianism when it suits them, then turn and look the other way when it does not. At least be man enough not to don the disguise.

45
3DHS / Prominent Republicans Desert McCain, but Polls Tighten
« on: October 31, 2008, 04:31:21 PM »
More Republicans desert McCain

BBC

Republican solidarity appears to be at stake as more prominent Republicans have lent their support to Democrat Senator Barack Obama in the campaign.

Former Senator Charles Mathias of Maryland is the latest to throw his weight behind the Democratic nominee.

He joins former Secretary of State Colin Powell, former Massachusetts Governor William Weld, and former Bush press secretary Scott McClellan.

The selection of Sarah Palin is one factor turning off some Republicans.

Former Senator Mathias told The Washington Post:

"For me, the decision is based on the long-range needs of our country and which of these two candidates I feel is better suited to recharge America's economic health, restore its prestige abroad and inspire anew all people who cherish freedom and equality.

"For me, that person is Barack Obama."

The economy is a major consideration for voters in this election. A Gallup poll found that not only is the economy perceived as the most important issue in the election, but the percentage who rate it as extremely important to their vote is the highest since 1996.

The poll found that although the economy was the top-rated issue for all voters, Republicans gave more importance to terrorism and moral values than did Democrats.

These results came after former secretary of state Colin Powell's public endorsement of Mr Obama last week.

'Alienated' the middle

Mr McCain said he was not surprised by Mr Powell's move, and highlighted the secretaries of state who do back him.

"I'm also very pleased to have the endorsement of four former secretaries of state, Secretaries [Henry] Kissinger, [James] Baker, [Lawrence] Eagleburger and [Alexander] Haig. And I'm proud to have the endorsement of well over 200 retired Army generals and admirals", Mr McCain said.

Most recently, former Massachusetts Governor William Weld, who supported Mr Romney during the primaries, announced his endorsement of the Democratic candidate.

President Bush's former speechwriter David Frum indicated that Mr McCain's selection of Sarah Palin as his running mate, could be a reason for Republican disunity.

"The very same campaign strategy that has belatedly mobilized the Republican core has alienated and offended the great national middle, which was the only place where the 2008 election could have been won", Mr Frum said.

Race tightening

Republican Congressman Christopher Shays, who is the co-chairman of the McCain campaign in Connecticut, told the Yale Daily News that Mr McCain "did not live up to his pledge to fight a clean campaign."

And Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty, once considered a possible vice-presidential choice for John McCain, said that Obama "has a pretty good advantage in Minnesota right now."

Republican leaders are not alone in crossing over party lines to support the Democrat.

Some traditionally conservative newspapers have turned their backs on Mr McCain. The Chicago Tribune and The Denver Post, which endorsed President George W. Bush in 2004, threw their support at Mr Obama.

The Los Angeles Times, who backed Mr McCain during the Republican primaries, also endorsed Mr Obama for president.

But how much influence such endorsements have on the final outcome is not clear.

The latest opinion polls show the race tightening. A Rasmussen poll has Mr McCain narrowing the gap to within three points of Mr Obama, at 47% to 50%.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 234