Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - sirs

Pages: 1 ... 1801 1802 [1803] 1804 1805 1806
27031
3DHS / Re: Wouldn't it be ironic.
« on: September 20, 2006, 11:43:38 PM »
So, one more time....in YOUR words, what's/where's the irony of terrorists being convicted of crimes and put to death.  Your title, your claim.  Have we (the U.S.) fraudulantly and without cause been putting Islamofascist terrorists to death?

27032
3DHS / Re: Wouldn't it be ironic.
« on: September 20, 2006, 06:09:08 PM »
My apologies if you missed the question earlier Lanya, and understandible, when trying to get in tune with this new forum format.  Now, could you answer my question, in your own words, please.  What's/where's the irony of terrorists being convicted of crimes and put to death.  Have we (the U.S.) fraudulantly and without cause been putting Islamofascist terrorists to death?

27033
3DHS / Re: Wouldn't it be ironic
« on: September 20, 2006, 05:02:19 PM »
More of that tried and true Lanya tactic of not answering direct questions, I see        :(

27034
3DHS / Re: Gas prices are plummeting, yet...
« on: September 20, 2006, 05:00:47 PM »
Who the hell is saying anyone in the mainstream media "hates America"?      ???

27035
3DHS / Re: Is the Hitler analogy outdated?
« on: September 20, 2006, 04:47:50 PM »
what about the ability to send people to prison without any legal representation or pressing charges for over four years. Surely that violates constitutional rights.

Enemy combatants, especially captured on non U.S. soil don't qualify for U.S. Constitutional rights, as far as I'm aware of.  And without them donning uniforms, nor do they actually qualify for Geneva convention rights, though I concede that's currently being determined by the courts.  Were prisoners taken during WWII, Vietnam, Korea, even the prior Gulf wars given some Constitutional protections & immediate legal representation?  One more time for those slow on the grasping chain, THIS IS A WAR, NOT SOME LEGAL LAW ENFORCEMENT ISSUE

27036
3DHS / Re: Apparently, the Pope must die
« on: September 20, 2006, 02:51:31 PM »
Ah, what a useless response.

Well, that's one useless opinion     :(

You call non-fascists what? Fascists.

Oy, is their a rationale for your being completely obtuse?

You lump all Muslim militants into one category as though there is no regional or political battle they are fighting

No, I lump all muslim militants bent on the agenda of bringing their mutated version of Islam foward as the foundation to living & governing, into 1 category.  To convert to it, be completely subjugated to it, or die as the only viable options.  And if you happen to be israel, you only have 1 option, die.  What they do regionally is irrelvent to the global goal.  Put it this way, I'm looking at the forest, while you're focused on the pine tree

You want Hezbollah, Hamas, Muslim Brotherhood, al-Qaeda, and Harakat ul-Mujahidin to be lumped together in one group and they simply are not

They actually, quite simply are, despite not having one supreme commander currently.  Their actions & public declarations make that transparantly clear
 

27037
3DHS / Re: Gas prices are plummeting, yet...
« on: September 20, 2006, 02:16:15 PM »
Damn that Bush......oh wait         ;)

27038
3DHS / Re: Apparently, the Pope must die
« on: September 20, 2006, 02:15:04 PM »
If anyone is not calling a duck a duck, it is you. You are calling every bird a duck and hoping that someone will declare open season.

That's quickly debunked with the fact I call nothing else but these radical muslim militants for what they are.  To validate your claim, I'd have to call all the Arab world fascists, INCLUDING Arab Christians.  Again, the label is specific to those who exemply it, with their actions, goals, & rhetoric.  And no, we don't have their publically posted party platform yet, for you to semantically take apart

You don't even come close to "calling a duck a duck."

I have, with examples and supporting official definitions.  Your continued refusal to acknowledge the obvious isn't my problem

Thinking critically takes effort.

I can only hope you'll start to catch on, since I know you have been able to do so in the past.

27039
3DHS / Re: Apparently, the Pope must die
« on: September 20, 2006, 12:46:36 PM »
The true Arab fascists that Sirs so dearly loves to talk about, but knows nothing of, where mostly Arab Christians.

Spoken with sincere ignorance?  Ducks aren't ducks in your realm of debate?  Care to point out what "christians" I'm referring to as Islamicfascists, and how they're deemed Chrisitan in your version of events?

27040
3DHS / Re: Apparently, the Pope must die
« on: September 20, 2006, 02:00:04 AM »
In other words, NO examples of any modern Christian versions of the inquisation or burning at the stake.  But since, in your opinion, Christianity had a head start in such, current barbarism & terrorism at the hands of Islamicfascists and Radical muslim militants is acceptable, because hey......they have to be allowed to catch up, right?

27041
3DHS / Re: The Anti-U.S. Summit
« on: September 20, 2006, 01:24:43 AM »
Actually, to the sane and normal, that constituted a snide little joke.  Pretty funny, too, IMHO.

Not really

However, I don't think conservatives like sirs are really interested in substantive debate because they lose those almost every one they enter.

Finally.....a little humor     :D

27042
3DHS / Re: The Anti-U.S. Summit
« on: September 20, 2006, 12:57:44 AM »
Of course to the true conservative, if you are an enemy of Bush, you ARE an enemy of America.

What constitutes as substantive debate from the hard left, these days        ::)

27043
3DHS / Wake up and smell the border
« on: September 19, 2006, 10:55:18 PM »
Senate to consider border fence bill
Posted 9/19/2006   

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate will consider a bill calling for erecting 700 miles of fencing on the U.S-Mexican border, a proposal that has been approved twice by the House.
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., used a legislative maneuver to get the bill to the floor as early as Wednesday, when the Senate could decide whether to move forward on the legislation.

"Border security is the essential first step of any effort to enact immigration reform. Only when we have convinced the American people of our commitment to securing our borders will we be able reach a consensus on comprehensive immigration reform," Frist said in a statement.

Democrats are likely to try to block the bill. They may try to attach the comprehensive immigration bill the Senate passed in May as an amendment and push debate into next week. A delay could be a problem as Congress tries to wrestle with legislation addressing treatment of terrorism suspects.

"This smacks of desperation and a clear repudiation of President Bush's support for comprehensive immigration reform. It's obviously designed to play to the base. Sen. Frist was for comprehensive immigration reform before he was against it," said Jim Manley, spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev.

House Republicans, trying to keep the illegal immigration issue before voters, passed the fence bill last week by a vote of 283-138. The House had approved the same amount of fencing last December as part of a broader bill that would have made being in the country illegally a felony. That bill is stalled.

The nearly 2,000-mile U.S.-Mexican border now has about 75 miles of fencing.

The Senate's immigration bill calls for 370 miles of triple-layer fencing along the Mexican border. The Senate approved $1.8 billion in a defense spending bill for the construction. The House has not provided funding for the fence it approved.

The House and Senate passed far different immigration bills. Republican leaders in the House have resisted compromise. Heading into elections, they chose instead to take out parts of their bill and pass them separately to keep the focus on border security, which plays well with conservative voters.

The fence bill to be considered in the Senate is HR 6061.


http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-09-19-border-security_x.htm
 

27044
3DHS / Re: Wouldn't it be ironic
« on: September 19, 2006, 08:18:03 PM »
How so?

27045
I'm willing to give up:
FBI access to Jihad/terrorist/bombmaking book records
NSA monitoring of any calls to terrorists, who may be calling me

Pages: 1 ... 1801 1802 [1803] 1804 1805 1806