Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - Christians4LessGvt

Pages: 1 ... 167 168 [169] 170 171 ... 177
2521
3DHS / Senior Clinton advisor arrested for "Aggravated" DWI
« on: January 11, 2008, 10:08:01 PM »


Blumenthal On the Boil
Newsweek, by Suzanne Smalley
Jan 11, 2008

Sidney Blumenthal plays hardball. A longtime confidante and adviser to the Clintons, he has zealously defended them through any number of scandal investigations. Along the way, Blumenthal has shown an affinity for the sharp counterattack. When a group of Arkansas state troopers in the early 1990s began leveling charges that Bill Clinton had strayed in his marriage, Blumenthal shot back--penning an article in The New Yorker accusing the troopers of a litany of their own transgressions, including attempted fraud, marital infidelity and drunken driving.

Now, Blumenthal himself faces charges of driving drunk. Blumenthal, an unpaid senior adviser to Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign, was arrested in Nashua on the eve of the New Hampshire primary and charged with aggravated DWI, according two members of the Nashua police force.

Sgt. Mike Masella, one of the arresting officers, said the movements of a Buick caught his eye. I observed all his erratic driving, Masella said. When I first noticed him it was at an intersection. He abruptly stopped. That caught my eye. He was drifting in his lane. Masella followed the car, a rental, for a mile and a half, and clocked its speed at 70mph in a 30mph zone--more than twice the legal limit. Masella pulled the car over at 12:30 a.m. Monday morning. Blumenthal told the officer he was returning to his hotel from a restaurant in Manchester. After declining to take a Breathalyzer, Masella says, Blumenthal failed a field sobriety test. Blumenthal was handcuffed, booked, had his fingerprints taken and was held for four hours--standard operating procedure in such arrests in New Hampshire--before posting bail and being released. (He will be arraigned later this month.) Because the car was moving at excessive speeds, Blumenthal was given the more serious charge of "aggravated" DWI--which carries a mandatory sentence of at least three days behind bars. He's charged with a serious crime, says Nashua Police Capt. Peter Segal, who will oversee the case as it moves toward a court date.

Ray Mello, a New Hampshire attorney, says he is representing Blumenthal and will explore all of the avenues of discovery.

In reality, it's a traffic violation, Mello said, noting that the more serious "aggravated" DWI charge is due to the alleged speeding, not degree of intoxication. When asked if Blumenthal was driving drunk, Mello said, ?He?s going to pursue all legal defenses in court, and we're going to deal with the case in court and not in the media. (The Clinton campaign declined comment on the arrest and whether it would affect Blumenthal's status as an adviser.)

Blumenthal's attorney could, of course, work out a plea agreement with prosecutors and spare his client jail time. Masella said that Blumenthal, a journalist and author currently working as a senior fellow for the New York University Center on Law and Security, was a gracious arrestee. I asked if he was here with a campaign. He said he was here with Clinton," Masella said. Other than that we certainly suspected him of DWI, he was a perfect gentleman."

http://www.blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/01/11/blumenthal-on-the-boil.aspx

2522
3DHS / Michigan sees fewer gun deaths with more permits
« on: January 07, 2008, 02:50:00 PM »


Michigan sees fewer gun deaths with more permits
January 6, 2008

By DAWSON BELL

FREE PRESS STAFF WRITER

Six years after new rules made it much easier to get a license to carry concealed weapons,
the number of Michiganders legally packing heat has increased more than six-fold.

But dire predictions about increased violence and bloodshed have largely gone unfulfilled, according to law enforcement officials and, to the extent they can be measured, crime statistics.

The incidence of violent crime in Michigan in the six years since the law went into effect has been, on average, below the rate of the previous six years. The overall incidence of death from firearms, including suicide and accidents, also has declined.

More than 155,000 Michiganders -- about one in every 65 -- are now authorized to carry loaded guns as they go about their everyday affairs, according to Michigan State Police records.

About 25,000 people had CCW permits in Michigan before the law changed in 2001.

"I think the general consensus out there from law enforcement is that things were not as bad as we expected," said Woodhaven Police Chief Michael Martin, cochair of the legislative committee for the Michigan Association of Chiefs of Police. "There are problems with gun violence. But ... I think we can breathe a sigh of relief that what we anticipated didn't happen."

John Lott, a visiting professor at the University of Maryland who has done extensive research on the role of firearms in American society, said the results in Michigan since the law changed don't surprise him.

Academic studies of concealed weapons laws that generally allow citizens to obtain permits have shown different results, Lott said. About two-thirds of the studies suggest the laws reduce crime; the rest show no net effect, he said.

But no peer-reviewed study has ever shown that crime increases when jurisdictions enact changes like those put in place by the Legislature and then-Gov. John Engler in 2000, Lott said.

In Michigan and elsewhere (liberal permitting is the rule in about 40 states), those who seek CCW permits, get training and pay licensing fees tend to be "the kind of people who don't break laws," Lott said.

Nationally, the rate of CCW permits being revoked is very low, he said. State Police reports in Michigan indicate that 2,178 permits have been revoked or suspended since 2001, slightly more than 1% of those issued.

Another State Police report found that 175 Michigan permit holders were convicted of a crime, most of them nonviolent, requiring revocation or suspension of their permits between July 1, 2005, and June 30, 2006.

But even if more armed citizens have not wreaked havoc, some critics of Michigan's law chafe at how it was passed: against stiff opposition in a lame duck legislative session and attached to an appropriation that nullified efforts at repeal by referendum.

Kenneth Levin, a West Bloomfield physician, was one of those critics. In a letter to the Free Press in July 2001, he referred to the "inevitable first victim of road or workplace rage as a result of this law."

Last month, Levin said he suspected "it probably hasn't turned out as bad as I thought. I don't think I was wrong, but my worst fears weren't realized."

But the manner in which the law was enacted was nevertheless "sneaky" and "undemocratic," Levin said.

Other opponents remain convinced that it has contributed to an ongoing epidemic of firearms-related death and destruction.

Shikha Hamilton of Grosse Pointe, president of the Michigan chapter of the anti-gun group Million Moms March, said she believes overall gun violence (including suicide and accidental shootings) is up in Michigan since 2001. Many incidents involving CCW permit holders have not been widely reported, she said.

The most publicized recent case came early in 2007, when a 40-year-old Macomb County woman fired from her vehicle toward the driver of a truck she claimed had cut her off on I-94. Bernadette Headd was convicted of assault and sentenced to two years in prison.

Hamilton said that even if gun violence has ebbed, it remains pervasive, tragic and unnecessary. At the least, a more liberal concealed weapons law means there are more guns in homes and cars and on the street, she said, and more potential for disaster.

Advocates for the law argue that there is nothing equivocal about the experience of the CCW permit holders who have warded off threats and, in a few instances, saved themselves from harm.

In September, a 36-year-old Troy man killed an armed 18-year-old assailant who, with three other suspects, attempted to steal his car outside Detroit Police headquarters.

Michelle Reurink, 40, a consultant in Lansing, got her CCW permit last year, not so much because she felt an imminent threat to her well-being, she said, but because she's a strong believer in the Constitution's Second Amendment -- the right to bear arms.

"The primary reason I got it is because I feel like I have the right to have it," she said.

Still, she doesn't often carry her gun during her daily routine, though she takes it when she and her husband go on their boat, she said.

Having the license and a handgun makes her feel more secure in her home (where no one needs a CCW license to have a gun), she said. She also feels more secure because of the required training, including self-defense lessons, she took as part of the license application.

Mark Cortis of Royal Oak, who conducts concealed weapons license training and sits on the Oakland County gun board, said he believes the benefits of an armed citizenry are evident in small ways almost every day, as permit holders deter trouble and live more confidently.

"The police just can't protect you," Cortis said. "If you have to call 911, it's probably
already too late."

Contact DAWSON BELL at 313-222-6604 or dbell@freepress.com.

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2008801060602


2523
3DHS / Hillary is about to quit? Can this really be happening?
« on: January 07, 2008, 10:49:39 AM »

"TALK OF HILLARY EXIT ENGULFS CAMPAIGN"





2524
3DHS / Hillary Booed @ Democratic Party Dinner in NH
« on: January 05, 2008, 01:39:59 AM »


January 4, 2008 9:18

Hillary Booed at NH Democratic Party Dinner

If the New Hampshire Democratic Party's 100 Club dinner is any bell weather Barack Obama will handily win here. When Obama, the dinner's last speaker,
took the stage the crowd surged forward chanting "O-bam-a" and "Fired Up, Ready to Go!" So many people pressed toward the stage that an announcer
asked people to "please take their seats for safety concerns."

By comparison Hillary was twice booed. The first time was when she said she has always and will continue to work for "change for you. The audience,
particularly from Obama supporters (they were waving Obama signs) let out a noise that sounded like a thousand people collectively groaning.
The second time came a few minutes later when Clinton said: "The there are two big questions for voters in New Hampshire. One is: who will
be ready to lead from day one? The second," and here Clinton was forced to pause as boos from the crowd mixed with cheers
from her own supporters. "Is who can we nominate who will go the distance against the Republicans??

The dinner held in the Hampshire Dome in Milford is the largest political dinner in New Hampshire history, Republican or Democrat.
More than 3,000 people attended.

http://www.time-blog.com/swampland/2008/01/hillary_booed_at_nh_democratic.html

2525
3DHS / HILLARY GETS 3rd IN IOWA?
« on: January 04, 2008, 12:16:37 AM »

funny


2526
3DHS / Michael Savage calls them vermin.
« on: December 31, 2007, 10:04:36 PM »


By OLIVER HARVEY
Chief Feature Writer
in Kahuta, Pakistan

Published: 31 Dec 2007



Qari Hifzur Rehamn, 60, spoke openly of imposing Islamic law?s stoning and beheading on Britain ?
as Pakistan was rocked by unrest over the assassination of Benazir Bhutto.

He warned: ?We want Islamic law for all Pakistan and then the world.

?We would like to do this by preaching. But if not then we would use force.?

Rehamn, 60, spoke in the Pakistani town of Kahuta as the call to prayer echoed over the dusty streets.

He is Imam of the town?s fundamentalist religious school or madrassa, where classes for kids as young as nine include Jihad or
Holy War and barbaric punishments.

His teachings are frightening enough. But his mosque lies in the shadow of the secret bunker where Pakistan produces nuclear weapons.

And when asked if it would be right to nuke British infidels, he laughed and answered: ?Probably.?

Rehamn, in a flowing grey beard and turban, explained Islamic, or Sharia Law as we sat surrounded by some of his 250 students.

He said: ?Adulterers who are married should be buried in earth to the waist and stoned to death.

?Homosexuals must be killed ? it?s the only way to stop them spreading. It should be by beheading or stoning, which the general public can do.

?Thieves should have their hands cut off. Women should remain indoors and films and pop music should be banned.?

So what does he think of Britain? The dad insisted: ?The nonbelievers must be converted to Islam. Morals in your society,
with women wearing revealing clothes, have gone wrong.?

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article634210.ece


2527
3DHS / Don't Worry!
« on: December 28, 2007, 05:23:46 PM »







2528
3DHS / Hillary Buys Us Xmas Presents With Our $
« on: December 22, 2007, 03:22:36 PM »

Figures
Hillary Buys Us Xmas Presents With Our $
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzBvQ9EeF3k

Take a look at Hillary?s special holiday video, where you can see her wishes for the American people.

Isn?t she the Lady Bountiful?

Never mind that her oh so amazing beneficence would all be funded by money taken at gunpoint from us,
the lowly the taxpayers.

?Merry Christmas Happy Holidays, suckers!?

2529
3DHS / "CHAOS" IN HILLARY'S CAMPAIGN
« on: December 16, 2007, 01:18:13 PM »


"CHAOS" IN HILLARY'S CAMPAIGN

By GINGER ADAMS OTIS

December 16, 2007 -- The bickering is far from over in Camp Clinton, insiders say, even as staffers closed ranks in an effort
to leave last week's campaign gaffes in the past.

"They're in chaos - there's definite friction at the top between [Clinton spokesman] Howard Wolfson and [chief strategist]
Mark Penn," said a source close to the campaign.

"Clinton's doing the best she can to get back on message, but her top echelon's distracted by its own power struggle, as opposed
to worrying about her," the source said, adding that a serious staff shakeup was unlikely, but "an old Clinton ally could be brought
in to mediate between Wolfson and Penn."

Another former Bill Clinton strategist called attempts to malign Sen. Barack Obama's credibility with voters "idiotic."

"Who cares what Obama was writing when he was in kindergarten?" said the analyst, referring to recent Clinton reports
that Obama from an early age had shown an interest in running for president.

"And now we're moving up the food chain to what he did in high school? It's an idiotic strategy, and it came at the wrong
time for her."

Clinton was left red-faced Thursday after a New Hampshire staffer told a Washington Post reporter that Obama's already-admitted
drug use left him vulnerable to Republican attacks. Clinton - once the front-runner - found herself having to denounce her staffer's
unauthorized remarks, accept the staffer's resignation, and then personally apologize to her closest rival in the space
of a day.

http://www.nypost.com/seven/12162007/news/nationalnews/chaos_in_hillarys_campaign_714570.htm


2530
3DHS / Hillary Clinton vows not to quit
« on: December 15, 2007, 05:36:54 PM »


Hillary Clinton vows not to quit
BY MICHAEL SAUL
DAILY NEWS POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT

Saturday, December 15th 2007


(Lienemann/Getty)
 
Hillary Clinton has seen her commanding lead in the polls slip in recent weeks.

JOHNSTON, Iowa - Hillary Clinton, who spent the past year as the Democratic presidential front-runner fostering an aura of inevitability,
found herself Friday in the humbling position of declaring she won't be knocked out early.

With polls showing Clinton locked in a tough battle in Iowa's Jan. 3 caucuses and her once dominant lead in New Hampshire now gone,
the former First Lady said she is in the race to stay through Super Duper Tuesday, when more than 20 states including New York and California hold
primaries.

"I have always intended to go all the way through this process, all the way through the Feb. 5 states," said Clinton when asked during an interview
on Iowa Public Television whether her campaign could withstand a loss in Iowa. "Every single place that there's going to be a caucus or an election
between now and Feb. 5, I'm going to contend in."

"I always thought this would get close," said Clinton, now facing a tougher challenge by Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.). "This is what happens in a
contested election."

For the first time Friday, Clinton also responded to questions about the resignation of her national co-chairman Bill Shaheen, who stepped down after
he suggested Obama may have sold drugs as a teenager.

"I not only disapproved but it did not reflect the campaign that I'm running," Clinton said.

Obama said Friday he's become a target for political attacks because the momentum has turned in his favor.

"The fact that we're up in Iowa and we've now closed the gap in New Hampshire and South Carolina, that means we've
got momentum and that means you're a target," Obama said. "What it also means is folks are excited; they're energized.
I think people are realizing we've got a chance."

Clinton picked up the endorsement Friday of Rep. Leonard Boswell, a prominent Iowan who has considerable credibility
in the farming community, and the backing of New York's 1199 SEIU and 32BJ, the health care and building workers unions.

But the union endorsements can't help Clinton where she needs it most right now - in the earliest voting states of Iowa and New Hampshire.
Out-of-state locals can't compete against the candidate chosen by the unions' chapters in those states - in this case, John Edwards.
With Celeste Katz in New York

msaul@nydailynews.com

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2007/12/15/2007-12-15_hillary_clinton_vows_not_to_quit-4.html




2531
3DHS / Looks like Hugo Chavez has some "John Edwards" type of friends
« on: December 14, 2007, 06:17:13 PM »
More leftist frauds



Some Chavez allies slow to shed luxuries
By CHRISTOPHER TOOTHAKER
ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER

CARACAS, Venezuela -- Hugo Chavez constantly urges his supporters to reject "savage capitalism," but allies of Venezuela's president have been slow to embrace his socialist values - and some are struggling to explain their consumption of luxury goods.

Justice Minister Pedro Carreno became the subject of widespread criticism and ridicule by local media this week, when a journalist asked if it wasn't contradictory to attack capitalism while sporting a $180 Louis Vuitton tie and $500 Gucci shoes.

Apparently caught off guard, Carreno stammered unintelligibly for a few seconds before responding: "It's not contradictory because I would like Venezuela to produce all this, that way I could purchase things produced here instead of 95 percent of what we consume being imported."

Poking fun at Carreno in an editorial published in the Tal Cual daily on Friday, comedian Laureano Marquez wrote a fictional response from the government official.

"Do you think that I, as a revolutionary, am not disgusted by having this imperialist trash around my neck? Of course, but I don't have any other option while locally made ties are not produced," Marquez wrote.

A video clip of Carreno's statements had been viewed more than 20,000 times on Friday, two days after it was posted on the YouTube Web site.

Chavez - a close ally of Cuban leader Fidel Castro - preaches socialist ideals, but persuading Venezuelans to adopt more austere lifestyles has been a daunting task in this oil-rich South American country characterized by unchecked consumerism.

Carreno isn't the only government official with a penchant for well-to-do outfits or luxury cars.

Information Minister Willian Lara often wears Tommy Hilfiger jackets, although they are red - the color of Chavez's ruling party. And Luis Acosta, the pro-Chavez governor of Carabobo state, argued last year that authorities can purchase expensive cars without sacrificing their revolutionary ideals.

"Is it that we revolutionaries don't have the right to have a Hummer or a car? If we make money, we can do it," Acosta said.

Such statements - and shows of opulence among some of Chavez's closest allies - prompted the socialist president to later reprimand supporters for failing to shed their materialist ways.

Threatening to impose new taxes on luxury goods in October, Chavez said: "What kind of revolution is this? The Whisky Revolution? The Hummer Revolution? No, this is a real revolution!"

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/1102ap_venezuela_luxury_vs_socialism.html


2532
3DHS / MSNBC: "Hillary's campaign is teetering on the brink"
« on: December 14, 2007, 03:56:25 PM »


Huckaboom and Hillabust
The surprising falls and unexpected gains ahead of Iowa's caucuses

By Howard Fineman
MSNBC
Wed., Dec. 12, 2007

WASHINGTON - Sen. Hillary Clinton's campaign is teetering on the brink, no matter what the meaningless national horserace numbers say. The notion that she has a post-Iowa "firewall" in New Hampshire is a fantasy, and she is in danger of losing all four early contests, including Nevada and South Carolina probably to Sen. Barack Obama, who is now, in momentum terms, the Democratic frontrunner.

On the Republican side, meanwhile, the race is shaping up in an even more unexpected way: a contest between two former Northern moderates (Rudy Giuliani and Mitt Romney) for the right to take on a Southern Baptist preacher, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, who believes in the inerrancy of Scripture but not in Darwinian evolution.

This week is the last chance the candidates will gather en masse to confront each other, and in a neutral setting. They are wending their way through ice storms to Iowa, where the Des Moines Register and Iowa Public Television are hosting back-to-back debates.

Here's where things stand for the major candidates with the most to gain and lose in the debates, in Iowa, and in the early going. Take a good look at the rest of the field. They won't be around for long.

SEN. BARACK OBAMA

National polls still give Hillary a double-digit lead. Those polls mean nothing. What matters now is not the number but the direction, and Obama is movin? on up at a rapid pace. Little pieces of evidence matter. In Manchester, N.H., the other day, Democratic Gov. John Lynch showed up at the Obama-Oprah rally, ostensibly to introduce Oprah, but, really to cover his bets politically. The newest polls in the state show why: Obama is tied with Hillary, and people are literally exchanging her lawn signs for his. If he can win Iowa and it remains a big "if" Hillary's campaign could collapse. New Hampshire would almost surely go his way. The Culinary Workers in Nevada might well endorse him, as could influential South Carolina Democratic Rep. Jim Clyburn. Black Democrats have complained for years that Iowa and New Hampshire are "too white." But the irony is, South Carolina African-Americans I talked to last weekend want to see if Obama can win white votes before they commit to him. There is no better way of doing that than in Iowa and New Hampshire. And don't forget something else: he has 150,000 online contributors. He can raise cash fast.

SEN. HILLARY CLINTON

If she is going to argue that Obama is unelectable in the fall  if she is going to argue that the Democrats cannot afford to take the risk on a Southside Chicago street organizer ? she had better get to it in the debate this week. But it is a tricky proposition.  In a way, Hillary is trapped by her own do-it-yourself feminist ethos. She should have surrogates out there pounding away at Obama. I haven?t seen them. And her husband, evidently, won?t do it. Why should Bill Clinton tarnish his image as ?America?s first black president? by attacking the man who might be the real deal? His circle is beginning to complain, loudly, about how Hillary is running her campaign. That kind of circular firing squad chatter is the first sign of a campaign headed into oblivion.

JOHN EDWARDS

Quite simply, this Iowa debate (and Iowa itself) is his first and last chance. He has placed all his money and bets for years on Iowa, where he is practically a local at this point. He absolutely HAS to win to get the media attention he needs to leverage his effort here into national momentum. He has the best, most cogent and inspiring stump speech, and a good, loyal organization. He could get pummeled by media dynamics. There will be exit polls on caucus night, but they will not be an accurate reflection of the final tallies of caucus delegates "the legally meaningful number" until later. Also, he is strongest in the small western towns, whose disproportionate influence in the delegate tallies (don?t ask) won't show up in the exits. In other words, he could win but not get credit for it by the time the winners are declared.

MIKE HUCKABEE

He can expect to be under fire from all sides, and his goal has to be to keep smiling and talking and explaining in a genial way. The man has a temper and not the thickest of skins, but he is also a brilliant rhetorical tactician and a stone-cold survivor of some of the roughest local politics in the nation, in Arkansas. As a preacher and then as a novice politician, he said and stood for some controversial things that come awfully close to sounding like he wanted to use public office to bring the nation to Christ. Ironically, it?s Mitt Romney who has had to defend his faith, but it's Huckabee an ordained minister who has the real explaining to do. But his competitors probably won't press that case too dangerous. Instead, they will focus on immigration, taxes and other less freighted issues. If Huck wins Iowa, he heads straight for South Carolina the real deal for the GOP and he will be hard to stop there.

MITT ROMNEY

The bad news for Romney is that he is getting blown out in Iowa, where he spent too much time and money. He and Rudy have to hope that the ol? prosecutor himself, Fred Thompson, is willing to step up and try to take down Huckabee. Romney?s hopes now rest not in Iowa, but in New Hampshire, where he would have to make his stand. Huckabee is the revenge of history on the GOP. Party strategists built the base on evangelicals in the South. Now they will have to live with the results.

RUDY GIULIANI

He clearly loves Judith Nathan, which is a good thing, because that love might cost him the nomination. The ?Tryst Fund? stories came at the worst possible time, and were particularly damaging because they involved the use of police resources by the law-and-order guy. He barely survived a grilling that Tim Russert gave him on "Meet the Press." Also, terrorism has faded as an issue. The top one now is the economy, which, on the GOP side, is translated into fears about immigration. Rudy is not, shall we say, well positioned on that issue.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22217110

2533
3DHS / Middle East Behind The Scenes "Earthquakes"
« on: December 14, 2007, 12:23:55 PM »
December 14, 2007

Abdullah and Ahmadinejad Continue Hand in Hand
They Reach across Historic Sunni-Shiite Schism for Strategic Muslim Pact

The Saudi King Abdullah and the Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, symbols of the rival Sunni and Shiite Muslim sects, have made a date: Ahmadinejad is the first Islamic Republic president Riyadh has ever invited to the annual pilgrimage to Mecca, which begins Dec. 18. Middle East sources reveal that the two rulers will make the pilgrimage together in a striking, once-in-a-century spectacle of Muslim reconciliation.

Clearly, the image a week ago of Abdullah and Ahmadinejad entering the annual summit of Gulf Arab leaders in Qatar holding hands, was minutely scripted. Then, too, it was the first time the head of the Islamic republic had been invited to this event.

Saudi royal court and intelligence advisers, directed by the monarch, and the Iranian secret service, which is personally ruled by Ahmadinejad, staged that entrance. Now, they are trying to build its Mecca sequel into a reverberating historic and religious crescendo.

The scenario calls for television cameras to track the two rulers, clad in the seamless, white ihram robe, and record their every step around the Kaaba for Muslim and world coverage.

Besides the powerfully evocative symbolism of the event for the divided Muslim world, its pragmatic importance for the next stage of world history cannot be overstated.

A strategic pact between the two oil-rich powers - one an Islamic theocracy, the other Guardian of Islam's shrines and regional Arab trendsetter will have a profound effect on the West?s war on Islamist terror and jihadist radicalism.

The United States, Europe, China, Russia and Japan will have to rethink their foreign and energy policies - especially in the Middle East and the Gulf. Once Iran is no longer a pariah, fresh economic and financial avenues will open up and new blocs and alliances take shape. The West will have to stop publicly disparaging the strident Iranian president as a fanatical little hothead and pathological liar, who is only good for spawning terror and outrageous calls for Israel to be wiped off the map. His partnership with the Saudi monarch will gain him an international kosher stamp.

The power to set energy prices and production quotas

Beside these earthquakes, some of the two partners down-to-earth expectations from their revolutionary vision:

1. Abdullah and Ahmadinejad will pose as heroic progenitors of an epic healing peace process for the divided Sunni and Shiite sects of Islam.

2. Together, they will assume the leadership of broad Muslim and Arab blocs.

3. As possessors of a large slice of the world's oil cake (Saudi Arabia exports over 9 million barrels a day; Iran close to 2.7 million), the two will collaborate on pricing and production policies. Huge Saudi investments will be available for developing Iranian oil fields and modernizing its energy industry. They can work together to develop and control Iraq?s oil economy - 70 percent of which is pumped from the oil fields of Basra province in the Shiite south.

4. Saudi Arabia will recognize an autonomous Shiite republic in southern Iraq in return for Iran's approval of and assistance in creating a Sunni Arab state in central Iraq. Together, they hold the keys to bringing sectarian strife in Iraq to an end.

5. Saudi Arabia and Iran will slap down an ultimatum for al Qaeda and other jihadist groups: Accept the rise of a rich and powerful new power at the center of the Muslim world which negates terrorism; give up violence and subscribe to the new center of power, or prepare for a crushing Saudi-Iranian war of extinction.

Al Qaeda?s Osama bin Laden has always excluded Shiites from Islam and fought them as apostates. If the new alliance takes off, he will no doubt denounce Ahmadinejad as a traitor to Islam who sold out to America and Israel.

Bin Laden may be driven to declare war on Iran. He has never gone that far, preferring to use the Shiite republic's help from time to time. For him, the Saudi royal house was and will remain a confederate of American imperialism against Islam.

At the same time, an Iranian-Saudi alliance will seriously impair al Qaeda's campaign of terror and limit its leeway for action in Muslim countries.

The two partners will also withdraw from some of their own terror sponsorships for the sake of their combined vision. The brunt will quite soon be felt by the Lebanese Hizballah and Palestinian Hamas and Jihad Islami, for example, which will be told to pull in their horns, although some maverick terror groups may remain out of control.

Iran will learn to make a bomb but stop on the brink.

6. Riyadh and Tehran propose to take a joint hand in Muslim conflicts in North Africa, Central Asia, the Caucasian, the Balkans, Lebanon and the Palestinians.

7. They will formulate an inter-Muslim nuclear cooperation accord based on the groundwork carried out by Iran's nuclear program.

Intelligence sources report that this approximate wording allows Iran to continue its civilian nuclear program, but proposes to incorporate its uranium enrichment operation in a regional scheme for the entire Gulf's benefit. Tehran will take its technology and capabilities up to the point of a nuclear bomb and halt before producing one. It is not known if Iran will share its knowledge with Saudi Arabia or other Arab nations, or whether a number of finished bombs or warheads are already in hand. This will transpire at some later stage, as in the case of North Korea.

In any event, the Arab world led by Saudi Arabia can be expected to beat former estimates and acquire nuclear weapons much earlier than expected.

8. The emergence of a Saudi-Iranian bloc is expected to prompt the corresponding rise of a second Muslim alliance between Pakistani, Indonesia and Malaysia. Both blocs will aspire to show the rest of the world a different, non-threatening, non-violent face of Islam from that of al Qaeda and other jihadist terror groups.

9. Asian sources report the three Asian powers have embarked on the first steps of their alignment, with early signs that it will be comparable in scope and vision to the Riyadh-Tehran partnership.

Both will be nuclear powers.

10. Where does the United States stand on these seismic Islamic movements?

Our Washington sources confirm that US President George W. Bush knows all about it and approves. King Abdullah has kept him fully abreast of developments. The White House for its part opened the door to the Washington-Tehran dialogue and its sequel by issuing its National Intelligence Estimate on Dec. 3, which cleared Iran of the charge of developing nuclear weapons after 2003.

Helping Bush end his term on a high note of success

As reported before, the Saudi king does not seek to expel American influence from the Gulf region, only to diversify the big power presence. In his briefings to the White House, Abdullah reported his impression that Ahmadinejad takes the same view, and has no problem with Riyadh seeking Washington's approval for major steps, after their pact is finalized.

Clearly, the United States of America has progressed from the role of Big Satan to Big Father of the Saudi-Iranian alliance.

Indeed, our Washington sources disclose that Bush is counting on this major realignment to rescue the end of his presidency from its widely predicted abysmal failure. He hopes it will usher him out of the White House on a high note marked by the positive outcome of the Iraq War, al Qaeda?s retreat and a Palestinian state.

11. If the Saudi-Iranian pact goes through as planned, Ahmadinejad will emerge as the strongest man in Iran, with a good chance of succeeding the ailing Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as supreme ruler.

Sources stress here that the new Islamic alliance embarked on by King Abdullah with the Iranian president jumping aboard, has taken its first, tentative steps and is at the delicate point where it can take off dramatically or go awry.

The pact and its endorsement by President Bush will most probably dominate early 2008 as the most dynamic political and strategic game in progress in the Middle East and beyond.

It should be remembered that both Abdullah and Ahmadinejad are working against ticking clocks: The Saudi king is in his eighties; no one knows his exact age but it is estimated at 86. The Iranian president at 51 is 30 years younger, but stands for re-election in 2010.

To mature into a solid alliance, this radical reshuffle of Middle East powerhouses must first lift off and then survive for the next two years. It must also gain endorsement from the next occupant of the White House in January 2009, whoever that may be.

One dangerous shoal is Ahmanidejad's impatience and appetite for power. If he is tempted to use the historic understanding between the two Muslim nations as impetus to impose Iranian Shiite supremacy on the Muslim world, the pact will go under and al Qaeda triumph.

[source: e-mail]

 

2534
3DHS / Hillary Clinton apologizes
« on: December 13, 2007, 06:00:25 PM »


Clinton Apologizes to Obama For Shaheen's Drug Comment
Dec 13, 2007

CONCORD, N.H. -- Despite a face-to-face apology from Sen. Hillary Clinton on an airport tarmac, the Barack Obama campaign today did its best to turn to its advantage remarks by a top Clinton supporter who said yesterday that Sen. Obama's admissions of past drug use would "open the door" to Republican attacks if he is the Democratic nominee.

At a press conference here, Ned Helms, a co-chairman of Obama's New Hampshire campaign, lamented the comments by Clinton state co-chair Billy Shaheen. In an interview yesterday with the Post, Shaheen said he worried that Republicans would have a field day picking apart Obama's past, notably his admissions of cocaine and marijuana use in his late teens. "The Republicans are not going to give up without a fight...and one of the things they're certainly going to jump on is his drug use," Shaheen said.

The Clinton campaign disassociated itself from the comments last night, saying they were "not authorized or condoned by the campaign in any way." Shaheen, the husband of former governor and 2008 Senate candidate Jeanne Shaheen, said in a statement, "I deeply regret the comments I made today and they were not authorized by the campaign in any way." This morning, Clinton approached Obama on the tarmac of Ronald Reagan National Airport in Washington to personally apologize for the remarks. "She made it clear that this kind of negative personal statement has no part in this campaign," said Clinton spokesman Phil Singer.

But Helms told reporters here that the remarks fit a larger pattern of negative attacks and insinuations from the Clinton camp, including an incident last week in which a Clinton volunteer county coordinator in Iowa forwarded an incendiary e-mail falsely asserting that Obama is a Muslim (the Clinton campaign asked the volunteer to step down). With each incident, Helms said, it has became harder to believe that the individuals were acting without any direction from above.

"I suppose you could say, well, the first time, that's what happened," said Helms. "But when you see a pattern, of people making statements and then the follow-up statement, that that wasn't authorized, it doesn't take a genius to see that there's a thread going on here. How many times are we going to see the isolated incident followed by the denial before we just simply say, 'Would you please stop?'"

Helms stopped short of calling for Shaheen's removal from his leadership post on the Clinton team, saying that "is a conversation that needs to take place within the Clinton campaign."

Obama's national headquarters also sought to capitalize on the Shaheen comments, with campaign manager David Plouffe sending out an e-mail asking supporters to counter the remarks with a $25 donation from 5,000 of them. "In an increasingly desperate effort to slow Senator Clinton's slide, the focus of the Clinton campaign has moved from Barack Obama's kindergarten years to his teenage years," Plouffe wrote, referring to the Clinton campaign's inclusion in a campaign document of a kindergarten essay by Obama declaring his presidential ambitions. "The only way to stop these kinds of tired, desperate attacks is to demonstrate very clearly that they have a real cost to Senator Clinton's campaign."

In his remarks, Shaheen, a local attorney and Democratic powerbroker, said he was worried that Republicans would have a particularly easy time going after Obama's drug use as a teenager because he has been so open about it. He contrasted this with George W. Bush, who Shaheen said wisely ruled out answering questions about his behavior as a younger man during his presidential run in 1999 and 2000.

Obama's candor on the subject, on the other hand, would "open the door" to further questions, Shaheen said. "It'll be, 'When was the last time? Did you ever give drugs to anyone? Did you sell them to anyone?'" he said. "There are so many openings for Republican dirty tricks. It's hard to overcome."

Obama has been free about discussing his drug use as a young man. In his 1995 memoir, Dreams From My Father, written shortly after he graduated from Harvard Law School, he wrote that during his difficult late teens "Pot had helped, and booze; maybe a little blow when you could afford it. Not smack, though."

"Junkie. Pothead. That's where I'd been headed: the final, fatal role of the young would-be black man," he wrote. "Except the highs hadn't been about that, me trying to prove what a down brother I was....I got high for just the opposite effect, something that could push questions of who I was out of my mind, something that could flatten out the landscape of my heart, blur the edges of my memory."

And speaking with high school students in Manchester, N.H. a few weeks ago, he said that he had "made some bad decisions" as a teenager. "There were times when I, you know, got into drinking, experimented with drugs. There was a whole stretch of time where I didn't really apply myself a lot," he said. But once in college, Obama said, he realized, "Man, I wasted a lot of time" in high school. He added, "It's not something I'm proud of. It was a mistake as a young man."

Shaheen's comments inevitably renewed memories of Bill Clinton's handling of his past marijuana use during the 1992 campaign, when he said he had smoked marijuana but did not inhale. Asked about this at the Manchester high school, Obama said, "I never understood that line. The point was to inhale. That was the point."

--Alec MacGillis

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2007/12/13/clinton_apologizes_to_obama_fo_1.html


2535
3DHS / what the hell is hillary doing?
« on: December 13, 2007, 10:32:22 AM »
Hill Goes Up In Smoke

Try to follow this. Desperate, as her lead tanks, Hillary sends a N.H. mouthpiece out to warn the Republicans will
use the recreational use of drugs Obama has already admitted to, actually hinting he may have sold drugs. Then
the campaign denies they authorized the hit. Then the mouth says he shouldn't have said it. Meanwhile it's the
top story of the day. Kindergarten attacked, now this garage. Has Sidney Blumenthal lost it?
Don't you just hate it when people think you are dumb?


Pages: 1 ... 167 168 [169] 170 171 ... 177