Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - Lanya

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 75
31
3DHS / Amazing
« on: June 05, 2008, 07:41:51 PM »
[The way I read it, he says he wants death because our constitution does not forbid same sex marriage. ?]

9/11 mastermind suspect: I want death
Posted on Thu, Jun. 05, 2008

BY CAROL ROSENBERG


GUANTANAMO BAY NAVY BASE, Cuba --
One by one, the U.S. military brought five accused 9/11 co-conspirators before a war court judge Thursday, and four rejected their free-of-charge American lawyers. Two said they welcomed death.

''In Allah I put my trust,'' reputed attack mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohammed told his trial judge, Marine Col. Ralph Kohlmann.

In response to a question of whether he understood that the crimes for which he was accused are punishable by a death sentence, Mohammed replied: ``This is what I wish -- to be martyred.''

It was the first appearance of the alleged senior al Qaeda leaders, whom the United States has held secretly and interrogated overseas since their capture in 2003.

They are accused of conspiring with Osama bin Laden to orchestrate the U.S. airline hijackings that toppled the World Trade Center, shattered the Pentagon and slammed into a Pennsylvania field on Sept. 11, 2001, killing 2,973 men, women and children.

All were brought from the prison camps several miles away to the special, eavesdrop-proof maximum-security war court, and sat one behind the other.

A security officer on several occasions hit a mute button to prevent journalists watching from remote sites from hearing the men speak. Once after a reference to American torture. Another time over a detainee's mental health medication.

Ramzi bin al Shibh, 36, was shackled at the ankles, and bolted to the courtroom floor. A Yemeni, he allegedly tried to join the Sept. 11 suicide squads, and obtain flight training in Florida, but failed to get a U.S. visa from Hamburg, Germany.

''I've been seeking martyrdom for five years. I tried for 9/11 to get a visa. And I could not obtain that visa,'' Bin al Shibh said in rejecting his defense lawyer. ``If this martyrdom happens today I will welcome it. God is great, God is great.''

He is also accused of making a videotaped ''martyr's will'' along with two of the 19 hijackers before they traveled to the United States in 2001, hijacked four airliners and turned them into missiles.

Air Force Maj. Gail Crawford, a spokeswoman for the Pentagon commissions, said he had ''mental issues.'' Bin al Shibh's military attorney, Navy Cmdr. Suzanne Lachelier, said defense lawyers had learned only at 8 p.m. Wednesday that the Yemeni was on ``psychotropic drugs.''

The hearing was meant to be an arraignment, a formal reading of the charges in advance of legal motions, discovery of evidence and a Sept. 15 opening of their trial.

But it went on for hours as the judge, Kohlmann, asked each man at length whether he was competent to act in his own defense.

Each man rejected the legitimacy of the war on terror court, in which U.S. military officers serve as judge and jurors -- at times with the power to issue death sentences.

''I am in the wrong court. I am not a criminal. My case is political,'' said Ammar al Baluchi, Mohammed's 30-year-old nephew, accused of sending money to the suicide squads.

''Even though the government tortured me free of charge for all these years, I cannot accept lawyers under these circumstances,'' he said. ``The lawyers are decoys or decorations.''

Waleed bin Attash, 30, who allegedly trained some of the 9/11 hijackers at an Afghanistan camp, likewise refused his lawyer.

By late afternoon, when the judge broke to give the men their second prayer break, only alleged financier Mustafa Hawsawi had yet to be questioned. The Saudi sat at the last defense table, awaiting his turn.

Mohammed's appearance was striking. The Pakistani looked 20 years older than the disheveled man in a T-shirt who was rousted from his bed in a photo of his 2003 capture. This Mohammed was tidily attired in pristine white tunic and turban -- and had grown a massive, mostly white, bushy beard that reached his chest.

He spoke in the broken English he learned as an engineering student in his 20s in North Carolina. And he wore dark-rimmed, prison-issue eyeglasses, which gave him an uncanny resemblance to Ayman al Zawahari, the still at-large bin Laden deputy and founder of Egypt's radical Muslim Islamic Jihad movement.

The session opened with the judge explaining that a U.S. security officer was monitoring the men's words, and could mute the audio feed if any of the men uttered something that Kohlmann said ``would be harmful to national security.''

Immediately after Ammar mentioned torture, a screen broadcasting the proceedings to a media room went blank -- and white noise blared from the screen.

In Bin al Shibh's case, the screen went to white noise during a discussion with the judge of his prison-mandated medication.

A military escort explained that it was in keeping with the U.S. Health Information Privacy Act, on a base where the Bush administration argues that the U.S. Constitution does not apply to foreigners.

The eavesdrop-proof courtroom was specially designed to mute the alleged terrorist's audio feed, if they divulged national security secrets such as their treatment in CIA custody.

The CIA director, Air Force Gen. Michael V. Hayden, has confirmed agents employed a controversial interrogation technique called waterboarding on Mohammed.

''I do not mention the torturing. I know this is a red line,'' Mohammed told the judge.

The first mention of ''torture'' came at 10 a.m. and the hearing had been underway for nearly an hour.

At the time, Kohlmann was repeatedly questioning the captive known in CIA circles as KSM on whether he understood the dangers of serving as his own attorney.

''You fully understand that, if you are ultimately convicted of the charges in this case, you could be sentenced to death?'' the judge asked Mohammed.

''I will not accept any attorney. I will represent myself,'' Mohammed said. ``I will not accept anybody, even if he is Muslim, if he swears to the American Constitution.''

Mohammed said he follows Islamic shariya law and rejected the U.S. Constitution, in part because it allows for ``same sexual marriage and many things are very bad.''


The accused sat under the steady, sober stare of a specially trained U.S. guard force inside a windowless bunker-like courtroom, with two or three guards within feet of each man's chair.

''You have killed my brother, who is younger than me, in this war,'' said bin Attash, 30. ``This is my time to be in your hands.''

It was unclear whether bin Attash was aware that his younger brother Hassan, 23, was likewise detained at a separate prison camp at Guant?namo -- and had arrived here two years before him.

Several of the civilian defense attorneys assigned to the case by the American Civil Liberties Union sought a delay in Thursday's proceedings, arguing that the men did not fully understand the implications of firing their attorneys.

''Mr. bin al Shibh has a distrust of American military personnel. He believes that he is a warrior, and that he should be treated as a warrior and not a criminal,'' said Thomas Durkin of Chicago.

Mohammed's ACLU attorney, David Nevin of Boise, Idaho, protested a ruling by the judge to let the defendant represent himself. ''Mr. Mohammed is not in a position to understand the impact, the reach of the decision he has made today,'' he said. ``He is willing to die.''

Bin al Shibh was the most animated, chatting with the other detainees.

His lawyers asked for a continuance of the hearing to give defense attorneys time enough to examine Bin al Shibh's competency to defend himself. Kohlmann rejected the request.

''It is not true that I can't represent myself. Or I am weak or sick,'' said Bin al Shibh. ``I am worthy to represent myself.''

Kohlmann ruled that, while the others were competent to act as their own attorneys, he wanted to clarify Bin al Shib's mental health situation in light of the revelation of his medication.

  http://www.miamiherald.com/news/breaking_news/story/559162.html

32
3DHS / Quote
« on: June 05, 2008, 03:54:06 AM »
"We pledged to support her to the end," Representative Charles B. Rangel, a New York Democrat who has been a patron of Mrs. Clinton since she first ran for the Senate, said in an interview. "Our problem is not being able to determine when the hell the end is."
----------Rep. Charlie Rangel

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/06/04/clinton-is-moving-toward-suspending-campaign-and-endorsing-obama/

33
3DHS / Boss man
« on: May 29, 2008, 07:39:24 PM »
[.................]

Alas, if that was the plan, it went sideways a long time ago. In today?s America, the majority is nothing if not impressed by power and fame (its legitimacy is irrelevant), nothing if not obedient. As for mooning the lord, the ass to the glass these days is more likely to be the lord?s, and our own posture toward it, well, something short of heroic. Worse yet, should someone decide to take offense, and suggest that it is not the lord?s place to act thusly, he will be set upon by the puckering multitude who will punish him for his impertinence.

At a White House reception a couple of years ago, President George Bush asked Senator-elect Jim Webb how things were going for his son, a Marine serving in Iraq. ?I?d like to get them out of Iraq, Mr. President,? Webb replied. ?I didn?t ask you that,? the president shot back. ?I asked you how your boy was doing.?

Webb, a decorated Vietnam War veteran, had not only risked his own life in the service of his country but now had a child in harm?s way, serving in an ill-conceived and criminally mismanaged war sold to the nation under false pretenses by the man standing in front of him. One might expect this second man to be nice. To show a modicum of respect. Should he fall short of this, one could at least take comfort in the certainty that the American people would hold him accountable for his rudeness and presumption.

Which is precisely what many of them did?they held Jim Webb accountable. ?I?m surprised and offended by Jim Webb,? declared Stephen Hess, a professor at George Washington University, in a New York Times article entitled ?A Breach of Manners Sets a Tough Town Atwitter.? Admitting that the president had perhaps been ?a little snippy,? Professor Hess went on to extol the democratic virtues of decorum and protocol, interrupting himself only long enough to recall a steel executive named Clarence Randall who, having once addressed Harry S Truman as ?Mr. Truman? instead of ?Mr. President,? remained haunted by it for decades.

Hess wasn?t the only one to be shocked by Webb?s behavior. Letitia Baldrige, the ?doyenne of Washington manners,? termed the whole thing ?a sad exchange.? Judith Martin, a.k.a. Miss Manners, made the point that ?even discussions of war and life and death did not justify suspending the rules,? then declined to comment on l?affaire Webb-Bush, saying, ?It would be rude of me to declare an individual rude.?

But it was left to Kate Zernike, the author of the Times article, to place the cherry atop this shameful confection in the form of a seemingly offhand parenthetical: ?(On criticizing the president in his own house, Ms. Baldrige quotes the French: ?a ne se fait pas??it is not done.?)?

To which one might reply, in the parlance of my native town: Why the fuck not? R?p?tez apr?s moi: It ain?t the man?s house. We?re letting him borrow it for a time. And he should behave accordingly?that is, as one cognizant of the honor bestowed upon him?or risk being evicted by the people in favor of a more suitable tenant.

But let?s not kid ourselves. The outrage over the Webb-Bush exchange was not really about decorum. It was about daring to stand up to the boss. Rudeness? Stop. This is America. We?re rude to one another more or less continually. We make mincemeat of one another on television, fiberoptically flame one another to a crisp, blog ourselves bloody. No, rudeness, as deplorable as it is, is not the point here, particularly as Webb, judged by any reasonable standard, wasn?t rude at all.
[............]

http://www.harpers.org/archive/2008/06/0082039

34
3DHS / Best states for children's health care
« on: May 28, 2008, 08:08:39 PM »
ABC News
Report Ranks Best States for Kids' Health Care
Iowa Takes No.1 Spot; Oklahoma Ranks Lowest for Care
By KATE BARRETT

May 28, 2008?

Iowa and Vermont provide children with the best health care, according to a report released today by an independent health care research foundation, while Oklahoma and Florida rank the worst when it comes to caring for kids.

The assessment, released by the Commonweath Fund, a private foundation focused on health care issues, ranked the 50 states and the District of Columbia to see how they fared on several counts, including health care access, quality, cost, equity and the potential for kids to lead long, healthy lives.

Researchers also took a close look at rates of insurance coverage, vaccinations and preventive visits to doctors, among other factors, concluding that there is a high correlation between a child's access to care and the quality of care that child receives.

"Iowa and Vermont have come out at the top of the scale on our measures," said Dr. Edward Schor, vice president of child development and preventive care at the Commonwealth Fund. "Both of these states have adopted policies to expand children's access to health care and improve their quality of care."

On the other hand, several bottom-ranked states had high numbers of uninsured children, and it was in those states that children were less likely to get recommended health care such as vaccines, dental care and regular checkups, according to the Commonwealth Fund president Karen Davis.

Researchers also concluded that there is enormous potential to make kids healthier. If faltering states performed as well as the strongest states did, the researchers said, an additional 4.6 million children across the country would have health insurance.

The changes would also result in as many as 800,000 more children being up to date on their vaccines and 11.8 million more children getting their recommended medical and dental checkups each year, according to the report.

"Investing in children is truly an investment in the future," Schor said. "It takes leadership at the state level as well as at the federal level."

Northeast and Heartland States Provide Best Kids' Health Care

Iowa did not rank first in any one health care category, but it still took the top spot for overall children's care.

According to Dr. Michael Artman, executive director and physician in chief at the University of Iowa's Children's Hospital, that's due in large measure to learning how to localize care for kids.

"Sometimes health care delivery in a rural state like Iowa is a little difficult," Artman said. "I think Iowa was very perceptive in recognizing that and working to develop systems so at least the screening systems and well-children care and identifying kids at risk -- all of that can be done in the local communities."

Several New England states followed top-ranking Iowa in providing children with the best overall care. Rounding out the top five were Vermont, Maine, Massachusetts and New Hampshire.

The regional cluster in the Northeast demonstrated that states where children were insured at high levels also came out on top in several other categories.

For instance, in Massachusetts, the state that ranked first for access to care, 75 percent of children had at least one medical and one dental visit in the past year compared with 46 percent of children who visited doctors and dentists in Idaho. Also in Massachusetts, 94 percent of young children were up to date on their immunizations, compared with 67 percent who were up to date in Nevada.

"A traditional measure of quality of health care is whether children get the key immunizations that are recommended for young children," Schor said.

Artman and researchers alike also touted the importance of a "medical home," also described as a primary care provider that families can go to as needed with their questions or concerns. Only one-third of children in Mississippi have a medical home, which contributed to the state's ranking as No. 49 overall. That's dramatically different from the 61 percent of children in New Hampshire who have a medical home they can access regularly.

"Health care and particularly child health care rests on the relationship between the family and the health care provider," Schor said.

Southern States Rank Low on List

Oklahoma ranked lowest on the Commonwealth Fund's list for children's health care. Florida, Mississippi, Louisiana and Arizona also took places at the bottom of the ranks.

Arizona, Louisiana, Mississippi also ranked close to the bottom when it came to access to care.

Across most states, minority, low-income and uninsured children received lower quality care. The rate of children who are uninsured ranged from 5 percent in Michigan to 20 percent in Texas.

Among Southern states, Alabama stood out as an exception to the trend, ranking 14th overall for kids' health care.

"Certainly with regard to Alabama, it was a matter of leadership," Davis said. "The state was the first one to take advantage of the state child health care program in 1997. It was also very efficient at forging a public-private partnership specifically with Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama."

To improve health care for children, the Commonwealth Fund recommended reauthorizing the State Children's Health Insurance Program, known as SCHIP, a federal program that aims to help states cover uninsured children in low-income families. Researchers attributed Iowa and Vermont's success in large part to that program and to the states' requirements for health plans and children's health care systems to report data on SCHIP.

Six million children nationwide are covered by SCHIP, and 28 million children nationwide are covered by Medicaid, meaning that more than one-third of children around the country get health care that's funded by the federal government as well as by the states.

President Bush and Democratic lawmakers in Congress butted heads over the details of reauthorizing SCHIP in 2007 and were forced to extend the program as is until next year.

Copyright ? 2008 ABC News Internet Ventures

http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=4942128

35
3DHS / Pixie Dust
« on: May 27, 2008, 02:58:56 PM »
By Larry Shaughnessy
CNN Pentagon Producer


SAN ANTONIO, Texas (CNN) -- Last week in an operating room in Texas, a wounded American soldier underwent a history-making procedure that could help him regrow the finger that was lost to a bomb attack in Baghdad last year.
art.harris.cnn.jpg

Army Sgt. Shiloh Harris is wheeled into surgery to undergo the experimental treatment to regrow what's left of his finger.

Army Sgt. Shiloh Harris' doctors applied specially formulated powder to what's left of the finger in an effort to do for wounded soldiers what salamanders can do naturally: replace missing body parts.

If it sounds like science fiction, the lead surgeon agreed.

"It is. But science fiction eventually becomes true, doesn't it?" said Dr. Steven Wolf of Brooke Army Medical Center.

Harris' surgery is part of a major new medical study of "regenerative medicine" being pursued by the Pentagon and several of the nation's top medical facilities, including the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and the Cleveland Clinic. So far nearly $250 million has been dedicated to the research.

Air Force Technical Sgt. Israel Del Toro is one of the wounded vets who might one day benefit from this research. He was injured by a bomb in Afghanistan. Both his hands were badly burned. On his left hand, what was left of his fingers fused together. "You know in the beginning when I first got hurt, I told them just cut it off. So I can get some function," Del Toro said. His doctors did not cut off his injured left arm. And since that injury, advancements in burn and amputation treatment mean he may one day be able to use his fingers again. Video Watch more on regenerative medicine ?

A key to the research dedicated to regrowing fingers and other body parts is a powder, nicknamed "pixie dust" by some of the people at Brooke. It's made from tissue extracted from pigs.

The pixie dust powder itself doesn't regrow the missing tissue, it tricks the patient's body into doing that itself. All bodies have stem cells. As we are developing in our mothers' wombs, those stem cells grow our fingers, toes, organs -- essentially our whole body. The stem cells stop doing that around birth, but they don't go away. The researchers believe the "pixie dust" can put those stem cells back to work growing new body parts.
Health Library

    * MayoClinic.com: Health Library

The powder forms a microscopic "scaffold" that attracts stem cells and convinces them to grow into the tissue that used to be there. "If it is next to the skin, it will start making skin. If it's next to a tendon, it will start making a tendon, and so that's the hope, at least in this particular project, that we can grow a finger," Wolf said.

It has worked in earlier experiments. "They have taken a uterus out of a dog, made one in the lab, put it back in, and had puppies," said Wolf. Researchers have also regrown a human bladder, implanted it in a person and it is working as nature intended.

While the technique has incredible promise, doctors will be watching for unexpected side effects as they follow Harris' recovery. "It could grow a cancer," Wolf said. "We will be closely monitoring for that to make sure that doesn't happen."

If the military's most badly wounded start benefiting, so will civilians. "If we can pull this off in missing parts the next step is, 'OK, can we grow a pancreas? Can we grow and replace that in a diabetic?' And can we do the same thing with a kidney and can we do the same thing with a heart?"
advertisement

One day, he hopes, people with heart trouble will be told, "That's OK. We will just grow you another one.

"That is something that is real science fiction."

http://www.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/05/26/regrowing.body.parts/index.html?eref=rss_topstories

36
3DHS / COINTELPRO
« on: May 26, 2008, 10:11:33 PM »
   [I realize this article is 2 years old but I had never heard of this story before.]
     
Published on Wednesday, March 8, 2006 by the Los Angeles Times

A Break-In to End All Break-Ins
In 1971, stolen FBI files exposed the government's domestic spying program.
by Allan M. Jalon
 

Thirty-five years ago today, a group of anonymous activists broke into the small, two-man office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation in Media, Pa., and stole more than 1,000 FBI documents that revealed years of systematic wiretapping, infiltration and media manipulation designed to suppress dissent.

The Citizens' Commission to Investigate the FBI, as the group called itself, forced its way in at night with a crowbar while much of the country was watching the Muhammad Ali-Joe Frazier fight. When agents arrived for work the next morning, they found the file cabinets virtually emptied.

Within a few weeks, the documents began to show up ? mailed anonymously in manila envelopes with no return address ? in the newsrooms of major American newspapers. When the Washington Post received copies, Atty. Gen. John N. Mitchell asked Executive Editor Ben Bradlee not to publish them because disclosure, he said, could "endanger the lives" of people involved in investigations on behalf of the United States.

Nevertheless, the Post broke the first story on March 24, 1971, after receiving an envelope with 14 FBI documents detailing how the bureau had enlisted a local police chief, letter carriers and a switchboard operator at Swarthmore College to spy on campus and black activist groups in the Philadelphia area.

More documents went to other reporters ? Tom Wicker received copies at his New York Times office; so did reporters at the Los Angeles Times ? and to politicians including Sen. George McGovern of South Dakota and Rep. Parren J. Mitchell of Maryland.

To this day, no individual has claimed responsibility for the break-in. The FBI, after building up a six-year, 33,000-page file on the case, couldn't solve it. But it remains one of the most lastingly consequential (although underemphasized) watersheds of political awareness in recent American history, one that poses tough questions even today for our national leaders who argue that fighting foreign enemies requires the government to spy on its citizens. The break-in is far less well known than Daniel Ellsberg's leak of the Pentagon Papers three months later, but in my opinion it deserves equal stature.

Found among the Media documents was a new word, "COINTELPRO," short for the FBI's "secret counterintelligence program," created to investigate and disrupt dissident political groups in the U.S. Under these programs, beginning in 1956, the bureau worked to "enhance the paranoia endemic in these circles," as one COINTELPRO memo put it, "to get the point across there is an FBI agent behind every mailbox."

The Media documents ? along with further revelations about COINTELPRO in the months and years that followed ? made it clear that the bureau had gone beyond mere intelligence-gathering to discredit, destabilize and demoralize groups ? many of them peaceful, legal civil rights organizations and antiwar groups ? that the FBI and Director J. Edgar Hoover found offensive or threatening.

For instance, agents sought to persuade Martin Luther King Jr. to kill himself just before he received the Nobel Prize. They sent him a composite tape made from bugs planted illegally in his hotel rooms when he was entertaining women other than his wife ? and threatened to make it public. "King, there is one thing left for you to do. You know what it is," FBI operatives wrote in their anonymous letter.

Under COINTELPRO, the bureau also targeted actress Jean Seberg for having made a donation to the Black Panther Party. The fragile actress ultimately committed suicide after a gossip nugget based on a FBI wiretap was leaked to the L.A. Times and published. The item, suggesting that the father of the baby she was carrying was a Black Panther rather than her French writer-husband, turned out to be wrong.

The sheer reach of a completely politicized FBI was one of the most frightening revelations of the Media documents. Underground newspapers were targeted. Students (and their professors) were targeted. Celebrities were targeted. The Communist Party of the U.S.A., the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, the Student Non-Violent Organizing Committee, the Black Panther Party, the Women's Strike for Peace ? all were targeted. "Neutralize them in the same manner they are trying to destroy and neutralize the U.S.," one memo said.

Eventually, the COINTELPRO memos ? some from Media and some unearthed later ? prompted hearings led by Rep. Don Edwards of California and by Sen. Frank Church of Idaho on intelligence agency abuses. In the mid-1970s, the wayward agency began finally to be reined in.

It is tragic when people lose faith in their government to the extent that they feel they must break laws to expose corruption.

But a war that had been started and sustained by lies had gone on for years. And a government had betrayed its citizens, manipulating their fear to strengthen its grip on power.

Today, again, many people worry that their government may be on the road to subverting its own ideals. I hope that the commemoration of those unknown activists being held today in Media, Pa., will serve as a reminder that fighting for democracy abroad must remain more than merely an excuse to weaken civil liberties at home.

Allan M. Jalon is a longtime contributor to The Times and other publications on issues of culture and media.

? 2006 Los Angeles Times

http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0308-27.htm

37
3DHS / Voted off the Island
« on: May 26, 2008, 07:18:32 PM »
http://www.tcpalm.com/news/2008/may/24/30gtteacher-lets-students-vote-out-classmate-5/?feedback=1#comments


Teacher lets Morningside students vote out classmate, 5

By Colleen Wixon (Contact)
Saturday, May 24, 2008
Alex Barton

Photo provided by the family

Alex Barton

STORY TOOLS

    * E-mail story
    * Comments
    * iPod friendly
    * Printer friendly

related linksMore Schools

    * Graduation 2008 on the Treasure Coast
    * South Fork students score at national quiz tournament
    * Stetson University summer program for kids now registering

Share and Enjoy Share and Enjoy [?]

PORT ST. LUCIE ? Melissa Barton said she is considering legal action after her son's kindergarten teacher led his classmates to vote him out of class.

After each classmate was allowed to say what they didn't like about Barton's 5-year-old son, Alex, his Morningside Elementary teacher Wendy Portillo said they were going to take a vote, Barton said.

By a 14 to 2 margin, the students voted Alex ? who is in the process of being diagnosed with autism ? out of the class.

Melissa Barton filed a complaint with Morningside's school resource officer, who investigated the matter, Port St. Lucie Department spokeswoman Michelle Steele said. But the state attorney's office concluded the matter did not meet the criteria for emotional child abuse, so no criminal charges will be filed, Steele said.

Port St. Lucie Police no longer are investigating, but police officials are documenting the complaint, she said.

Steele said the teacher confirmed the incident took place.

Portillo could not be reached for comment Friday.

Steele said the boy had been sent to the principal's office because of disciplinary issues. When he returned, Portillo made him go to the front of the room as a form of punishment, she said.

Barton said her son is in the process of being diagnosed with Asperger's syndrome, a type of high-functioning autism. Alex began the testing process in February at the suggestion of Morningside Principal Marcia Cully.

Children diagnosed with Asperger's often exhibit social isolation and eccentric behavior..

Alex has had disciplinary issues because of his disability, Barton said. After the family moved into the area and Alex and his sibling arrived at the school in January, Alex spent much of the time in the principal's office, she said.

He also had problems at his last school, but he did not have issues during his two years of preschool, Barton said.

School and district officials have met with Barton and her son to create an individual education plan to address his difficulties, she said. Portillo attended these meetings, Barton said.

Barton said after the vote, Portillo asked Alex how he felt.

"He said, 'I feel sad,' " Barton said.

Alex left the classroom and spent the rest of the day in the nurse's office, she said.

Barton said when she came to pick up her son at the school Wednesday, he was leaving the nurse's office.

"He was shaken up," she said.

Barton said the nurse told her to talk with Portillo, who told her what happened.

Alex hasn't been back to school since then, and Barton said he won't be returning. He starts screaming when she brings him with her to drop off his sibling at school.

Thursday night, his mother heard him saying "I'm not special" over and over.

Barton said Alex is reliving the incident.

The other students said he was "disgusting" and "annoying," Barton said.

"He was incredibly upset," Barton said. "The only friend he has ever made in his life was forced to do this."

St. Lucie School's spokeswoman Janice Karst said the district is investigating the incident, but could not make any further comment.

Vern Melvin, Department of Children and Families circuit administrator, confirmed the agency is investigating an allegation of abuse at Morningside but said he could not elaborate.

38
3DHS / Psychiatrists offer free service to troops
« on: May 26, 2008, 04:11:12 AM »
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/25/AR2008052500721.html?hpid=sec-health

Private psychiatrists offer free service to troops
 

Clinical Psychologist Brenna Chirby poses for a photo in Bethesda, Md., Thursday, May 22, 2008. Thousands of private counselors are offering free services to troops returning from war in Iraq and Afghanistan with mental health problems - jumping in to help a military that doesn't have enough therapists. "It's only an hour of your time," said Chirby, who counsels the family member of a someone deployed multiple tines. "How can you not give that to these men and women that ... are going oversees and fighting for us." (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)
Clinical Psychologist Brenna Chirby poses for a photo in Bethesda, Md., Thursday, May 22, 2008. Thousands of private counselors are offering free services to troops returning from war in Iraq and Afghanistan with mental health problems - jumping in to help a military that doesn't have enough therapists. "It's only an hour of your time," said Chirby, who counsels the family member of a someone deployed multiple tines. "How can you not give that to these men and women that ... are going oversees and fighting for us." (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana) (Jose Luis Magana - AP)

Clinical Psychologist Brenna Chirby poses for a photo in Bethesda, Md., Thursday, May 22, 2008. Thousands of private counselors are offering free services to troops returning from war in Iraq and Afghanistan with mental health problems - jumping in to help a military that doesn't have enough therapists. "It's only an hour of your time," said Chirby, who counsels the family member of a someone deployed multiple tines. "How can you not give that to these men and women that ... are going oversees and fighting for us." (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)
Clinical Psychologist Brenna Chirby poses for a photo in Bethesda, Md., Thursday, May 22, 2008. Thousands of private counselors are offering free services to troops returning from war in Iraq and Afghanistan with mental health problems - jumping in to help a military that doesn't have enough therapists. "It's only an hour of your time," said Chirby, who counsels the family member of a someone deployed multiple tines. "How can you not give that to these men and women that ... are going oversees and fighting for us." (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana) (Jose Luis Magana - AP)

Graphic shows percentage of U.S. troops with a mental health condition or traumatic brain injury and barriers to seeking mental health care

   

By PAULINE JELINEK
The Associated Press
Sunday, May 25, 2008; 1:39 PM

WASHINGTON -- Thousands of private counselors are offering free services to troops returning from Iraq and Afghanistan with mental health problems, jumping in to help because the military is short on therapists.

On this Memorial Day, America's armed forces and its veterans are coping with depression, suicide, family, marital and job problems on a scale not seen since Vietnam. The government has been in beg-borrow-and-steal mode, trying to hire psychiatrists and other professionals, recruit them with incentives or borrow them from other agencies.
[.......]

39
3DHS / Propaganda
« on: May 23, 2008, 04:34:35 PM »

Famed War Reporter Calls Pentagon/Media 'Propaganda' Program Illegal

In response to the "media generals" revelations, a Pentagon spokesman said this week that Donald Rumsfeld had reached out to critics as well, citing Joe Galloway. Here, Galloway responds.


 (May 15, 2008) -- Once upon a time, it was widely believed that one of the greatest sins the U.S. government or its temporary political masters could commit was to turn a propaganda machine loose on the American people.

Congress viewed this so seriously that every appropriations bill passed since 1951 has contained language that says no public money "shall be used for publicity or propaganda purposes within the United States" without the lawmakers' prior approval.

The Bush administration has been caught violating the propaganda ban before, notably in 2005 in the case of radio host Armstrong Williams, who was paid to endorse President Bush's No Child Left Behind law.

Particularly abhorrent to the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), which oversees compliance with the ban, is an agency's use of "covert propaganda" or "covert attempts to mold opinion through the undisclosed use of third parties."

This is why alarm bells should be ringing all over Washington about The New York Times' disclosure that then-Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld encouraged a secret Pentagon program to care for and spoon-feed more than 50 retired senior military officers whom the administration deemed reliable friends who could be counted on "to carry our water" on the television and cable networks.

Feeding the military analysts "key and valuable information" in secret briefings by Pentagon and White House officials, the idea went, would make them the go-to guys for the networks and encourage the networks to "weed out the less reliably friendly analysts . . . ."

This 2005 memorandum, addressed to then Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs Larry DiRita, added: "This trusted core group will be more than willing to work closely with us because we are their bread and butter."

Asked about the case of Col. Bill Cowan, who says he was cut off from the briefings for criticizing the war effort, DiRita told Glenn Greenwald of Salon.com: "I don't know anything. I saw that in the story. I've heard other assertions to that effect. It was certainly not the intent."

In a follow-up e-mail exchange between DiRita and Greenwald, Rumsfeld's former mouthpiece -- now Bank of America's chief spokesman -- elaborated on what he said he didn't remember: "I simply don't have any recollection of trying to restrict him (Cowan) or others from exposure to what was going on."

DiRita added: "There are plenty of examples to the contrary -- reaching out to people who specifically disagreed with us. One example I recall is Joe Galloway -- a persistent critic and apparently popular with military readers. He came in and met Secretary Rumsfeld and we had other interactions."

Now that's a real knee-slapper: Me as a poster boy for how Rumsfeld and DiRita "reached out" to their harshest critics even as they stroked and promoted and schemed to embed the old reliables to wax enthusiastic about a war that was going from bad to worse.

Let the record show that Rumsfelds' folks reached out to me on these few occasions:

--In early summer of 2003, half a dozen of us were invited to an off-the-record lunch with Rumsfeld in the Pentagon. The defense secretary seemed to have a poor grasp of the reality on the ground in Iraq and was still declaring that we'd do no nation-building there. He saw no insurgency, only a handful of "dead-enders".

-- In November 2005, DiRita invited me to a "one-on-one" lunch with Rumsfeld at the Pentagon. This one I accepted. I arrived to find across the table Rumsfeld, the then-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Marine Gen. Peter Pace; Army Vice Chief of Staff Gen. Dick Cody; Joint Staff Director Lt. Gen. Walter Sharp and DiRita. We went at it hammer and tongs for an hour and a half over their conduct of the war and the errors that were costing the lives of American soldiers. As I left, I told Rumsfeld that I'd continue to point out those mistakes every week in my column.

--In April 2006, DiRita sent me an e-mail telling me that my most recent column was "silly". That column had discussed an expensive war game the Pentagon conducted about a U.S. attack on a thinly disguised country that obviously was Iran. His complaint sparked an escalating e-mail war that most reckon DiRita lost (see lengthy E&P article about this by Greg Mitchell posted earlier this week)).

So much for the Rumsfeld/DiRita outreach to their critics. They were much too busy hand-feeding horse manure to their TV generals, who in turn were feeding the same product to the American public by the cubic yard.

There's little doubt that this program violated the laws against covert propaganda operations mounted against the American public by their own government. But in this administration, there's no one left to enforce that law or any of the other laws the Bush operatives have been busy violating.

The real crime is that the scheme worked. The television network bosses swallowed the bait, the hook, the line and the sinker, and they have yet to answer for it.
Joseph L. Galloway has covered numerous wars dating back to Vietnam, and is co-author of "We Were Soldiers Once ... and Young." He continues to write a weekly military column for McClatchy Newspapers.

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/columns/shoptalk_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003804298

40
3DHS / Follow the money
« on: May 23, 2008, 01:27:26 PM »
[...........]

In one case, according to documents displayed by Pentagon auditors at the hearing before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, a cash payment of $320.8 million in Iraqi money was authorized on the basis of a single signature and the words ?Iraqi Salary Payment? on an invoice. In another, $11.1 million of taxpayer money was paid to IAP, an American contractor, on the basis of a voucher with no indication of what was delivered...

The disclosure that $1.8 billion in Iraqi assets was mishandled comes on top of an earlier finding by an independent federal oversight agency, the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction, that United States occupation authorities early in the conflict could not account for the disbursement of $8.8 billion in Iraqi oil money and seized assets.
[............]

The mysterious payments, whose amounts had not been publicly disclosed, included $68.2 million to the United Kingdom, $45.3 million to Poland and $21.3 million to South Korea. Despite repeated requests, Pentagon auditors said they were unable to determine why the payments were made.

?It sounds like the coalition of the willing is the coalition of the paid ? they?re willing to be paid,? said Mr. Waxman
[.........]

In one instance, a United States Treasury check for $5,674,075.00 was written to pay a company called Al Kasid Specialized Vehicles Trading Company in Baghdad for items that a voucher does not even describe.

In another case, $6,268,320.07 went to the contractor Combat Support Associates with even less explanation. And a scrawl on another piece of paper says only that $8 million had been paid out as ?Funds for the Benefit of the Iraqi People.?

But perhaps the masterpiece of elliptic paperwork is the document identified at the top as a ?Public Voucher for Purchases and Services Other Than Personal.? It indicates that $320.8 million went for ?Iraqi Salary Payment,? with no explanation of what the Iraqis were paid to do.

Whatever it was, the document suggests, each of those Iraqis was handsomely compensated. Under the ?quantity? column is the number 1,000, presumably indicating the number of people who were to be paid ? to the tune of $320,800 apiece ? if the paperwork is to be trusted.
[......]

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/23/world/middleeast/23audit.html?_r=2&hp&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

41
3DHS / Gas prices in other countries
« on: May 22, 2008, 04:00:48 PM »
[...........]

A gallon of gas costs just 12 cents in Venezuela, $2.81 in China and $3.33 in Moscow, according to Associates for International Research Inc., a consulting firm based in Cambridge, Mass. Those prices encourage citizens of those countries to drive more, shielding them from the reality of a limited global supply and inflating prices in North America and Europe, where taxes have pushed as high as $8.73 in Norway and $8.38 in the United Kingdom.

But the possibility of countries backing off subsidies is slim, as entire populations would likely object to the sudden escalation in prices, adding another dimension of instability to already fragile places. "You already have had food riots in a dozen countries," Dancy said. "You take off the subsidies to gasoline and diesel, you're adding fuel to the fire. I don't think a lot of these governments legitimately have a choice. They're really in a vise."

[........]
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-sun-gas-prices-no-letup-may18,0,6879387.story

42
3DHS / It's those vegan terrorists
« on: May 22, 2008, 03:51:12 AM »
[Too funny]


News
Issue ? May 21, 2008
In preparation for the Republican National Convention, the FBI is soliciting informants to keep tabs on local protest groups
Moles Wanted

By Matt Snyders

They were looking for an informant to show up at "vegan potlucks" throughout the Twin Cities and rub shoulders with RNC protestors.

Paul Carroll was riding his bike when his cell phone vibrated.

Once he arrived home from the Hennepin County Courthouse, where he?d been served a gross misdemeanor for spray-painting the interior of a campus elevator, the lanky, wavy-haired University of Minnesota sophomore flipped open his phone and checked his messages. He was greeted by a voice he recognized immediately. It belonged to U of M Police Sgt. Erik Swanson, the officer to whom Carroll had turned himself in just three weeks earlier. When Carroll called back, Swanson asked him to meet at a coffee shop later that day, going on to assure a wary Carroll that he wasn?t in trouble.

Carroll, who requested that his real name not be used, showed up early and waited anxiously for Swanson?s arrival. Ten minutes later, he says, a casually dressed Swanson showed up, flanked by a woman whom he introduced as FBI Special Agent Maureen E. Mazzola. For the next 20 minutes, Mazzola would do most of the talking.

?She told me that I had the perfect ?look,?? recalls Carroll. ?And that I had the perfect personality?they kept saying I was friendly and personable?for what they were looking for.?

What they were looking for, Carroll says, was an informant?someone to show up at ?vegan potlucks? throughout the Twin Cities and rub shoulders with RNC protestors, schmoozing his way into their inner circles, then reporting back to the FBI?s Joint Terrorism Task Force, a partnership between multiple federal agencies and state and local law enforcement. The effort?s primary mission, according to the Minneapolis division?s website, is to ?investigate terrorist acts carried out by groups or organizations which fall within the definition of terrorist groups as set forth in the current United States Attorney General Guidelines.?

Carroll would be compensated for his efforts, but only if his involvement yielded an arrest. No exact dollar figure was offered.

?I?ll pass,? said Carroll.

For 10 more minutes, Mazzola and Swanson tried to sway him. He remained obstinate.

?Well, if you change your mind, call this number,? said Mazzola, handing him her card with her cell phone number scribbled on the back.

(Mazzola, Swanson, and the FBI did not return numerous calls seeking comment.)

Carroll?s story echoes a familiar theme. During the lead-up the 2004 Republican National Convention in New York City, the NYPD?s Intelligence Division infiltrated and spied on protest groups across the country, as well as in Canada and Europe. The program?s scope extended to explicitly nonviolent groups, including street theater troupes and church organizations.

There were also two reported instances of police officers, dressed as protestors, purposefully instigating clashes. At the 2004 Republican National Convention, the NYPD orchestrated a fake arrest to incite protestors. When a blond man was ?arrested,? nearby protestors began shouting, ?Let him go!? The helmeted police proceeded to push back against the crowd with batons and arrested at least two. In a similar instance, during an April 29, 2005, Critical Mass bike ride in New York, video footage captured a ?protestor??in reality an undercover cop?telling his captor, ?I?m on the job,? and being subsequently let go.

Minneapolis?s own recent Critical Mass skirmish was allegedly initiated by two unidentified stragglers in hoods?one wearing a handkerchief over his or her face?who ?began to make aggressive moves? near the back of the pack. During that humid August 31 evening, officers went on to arrest 19 cyclists while unleashing pepper spray into the faces of bystanders. The hooded duo was never apprehended.

In the scuffle?s wake, conspiracy theories swirled that the unprecedented surveillance?squad cars from multiple agencies and a helicopter hovering overhead?was due to the presence of RNC protesters in the ride. The MPD publicly denied this. But during the trial of cyclist Gus Ganley, MPD Sgt. David Stichter testified that a task force had been created to monitor the August 31 ride and that the department knew that members of an RNC protest group would be along for the ride.

?This is all part of a larger government effort to quell political dissent,? says Jordan Kushner, an attorney who represented Ganley and other Critical Mass arrestees. ?The Joint Terrorism Task Force is another example of using the buzzword ?terrorism? as a basis to clamp down on people?s freedoms and push forward a more authoritarian government.?

http://articles.citypages.com/2008-05-21/news/moles-wanted/

43
3DHS / Now we're no different than the Chinese
« on: May 21, 2008, 10:12:13 PM »

Report: U.S. Soldiers Did 'Dirty Work' for Chinese Interrogators
Alleges Guantanamo Personnel Softened Up Detainees at Request of Chinese Intelligence
By JUSTIN ROOD
May 20, 2008

Gitmo
U.S. Army troops stand guard over Sally Port One at Camp Delta where detainees are held at the United States Naval Base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
(REUTERS/Joe Skipper)
More Photos

U.S. military personnel at Guantanamo Bay allegedly softened up detainees at the request of Chinese intelligence officials who had come to the island facility to interrogate the men -- or they allowed the Chinese to dole out the treatment themselves, according to claims in a new government report.

Buried in a Department of Justice report released Tuesday are new allegations about a 2002 arrangement between the United States and China, which allowed Chinese intelligence to visit Guantanamo and interrogate Chinese Uighurs held there.

According to the report by Justice Department Inspector General Glenn Fine, an FBI agent reported a detainee belonging to China's ethnic Uighur minority and a Uighur translator told him Uighur detainees were kept awake for long periods, deprived of food and forced to endure cold for hours on end, just prior to questioning by Chinese interrogators.

Susan Manning, a lawyer who represents several Uighurs still held at Guantanamo, said Tuesday the allegations are all too familiar.

U.S. personnel "are engaging in abusive tactics on behalf of the Chinese," she said Tuesday. When Uighur detainees refused to talk to Chinese interrogators in 2002, U.S. military personnel put them in solitary confinement as punishment, she said.

"Why are we doing China's dirty work?" Manning said. "Surely we're better than that."

An official authorized to speak on behalf of the Defense Department but who declined to be named confirmed it was Pentagon policy to allow officials from other countries to have access to interview their nationals at Guantanamo but declined to discuss the specifics alleged in the report.

According to Fine's report, the FBI agent said the Uighur detainee told him that the night before his interrogation by Chinese officials, "he was awakened at 15-minute intervals the entire night and into the next day." The detainee also allegedly said he was "exposed to low room temperatures for long periods of time and was deprived of at least one meal."

"The agent stated that he understood that the treatment of the Uighur detainees was either carried out by the Chinese interrogators or was carried out by U.S. personnel at the behest of Chinese interrogators," the report by the Department of Justice inspector general stated.

U.S. forces captured roughly three dozen Uighurs in eastern Afghanistan shortly after invading the country in October 2001. The men said they were working there to earn money for families back home and to evade the Chinese government, which is known for taking a harsh and uncompromising line with separatist Uighurs.
[.........]
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4894921&page=1

45
3DHS / The Plot
« on: May 16, 2008, 03:44:30 PM »
[...............]


In November 1934, federal investigators uncovered an amazing plot involving some two dozen senior businessmen, a good many of them Wall Street financiers, to topple the government of the United States and install a fascist dictatorship.
 Roth?s novel is developed from several strands of this factual account; he assumed the plot is actually carried out, whereas in fact an alert FDR shut it down but stopped short of retaliatory measures against the plotters. A key element of the plot involved a retired prominent general who was to have raised a private army of 500,000 men from unemployed veterans and who blew the whistle when he learned more of what the plot entailed. The plot was heavily funded and well developed and had strong links with fascist forces abroad. A story in the New York Times and several other newspapers reported on it, and a special Congressional committee was created to conduct an investigation. The records of this committee were scrubbed and sealed away in the National Archives, where they have only recently been made available.

The Congressional committee kept the names of many of the participants under wraps and no criminal action was ever brought against them. But a few names have leaked out. And one is Prescott Bush, the grandfather of the incumbent president. Prescott Bush was of course deep into the business of the Hamburg-America Lines, and had tight relations throughout this period with the new Government that had come to power in Germany a year earlier under Chancellor Aldoph Hitler. It appears that Bush was to have formed a key liaison for the group with the new German government.

Prescott Bush, of course, went on to service as a U.S. Senator from Connecticut, and his son, George H.W. Bush emerged from World War II as a hero.

The Plot Against America portrayed in this episode of the BBC series ?Document? gives fascinating insight into a dark and little known piece of American history in which the nation stood on the brink of betrayal. The role of the most powerful political dynastic family in the nation?s history in this whole affair is shocking.

http://harpers.org/archive/2007/07/hbc-90000651

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 75