Yes, it's an abstract title to a thread, and its an abstract point being made, but one that needs to be made. A while back a certain Canadian poster went apesnot over being called in one of his all to frequent episodes of stretching the truth. It was apparently a bad day, and he needed to take it out on someone, so he took it out on sirs, by deciding to ignore future posts, despite both the lack of validity to the original accusation, and subsequent backpedal to simply cite sirs as not being a nice person, again despite a plethora of examples where folks, nearly on a day to day basis, who are not being nice to each other, this Canadian being no exception.
Then came Reply #47 on: August 05, 2010, which to this day has not been addressed by the accuser.
Too many otherwise interesting conversations here seem to end with sirs using his favorite word "lie". Everything that sirs does not believe is not an opinion, it is a "lie".
Examples, please. You do realize you're responding to Bt's post. But by all means, do a quick search here, and provide all these apparent numerous examples of sirs supposed "favorite word"...lest you be the one caught with his hand in the cookie jar
This is a perpetuation of the same "less than truthful" endeavor, this time by our other fellow liberal, that as noted above, has also gone unresponded to
Could that lack of a response be........no such plethora of examples?? no such pattern with sirs' posts, both originally when the claim was made, and subsequent to it?? I think its safe to say the silence speaks volumes
Now, that all said, and perhaps it was simply a slip, but it was a pleasant change of pace to see our Canadian provide a substantive response to a
recent sirs post. There had been 2 other occasions, but was assured they were simply errors, that the response was supposeldy based on a different poster. Was the lastest another error? Or was it a return to debate, which is what a debate forum is all about.....where when one is challenged on their claims, they either back them up with examples, reason & logic, or pull back in error, and thus learning from their mistake?
I think the jury is still out, on that one