Saul Alinsky, An Advocate of Living in Liberty
Oct 25th, 2010 by Charles Kadlec in Liberty, Political Discourse
No Comments Comments
This article was originally published by Forbes.com on October 20, 2010
The famous community organizer was no statist. Indeed, his book anticipated the Tea Party movement by 30 years.
Rules for Radicals
is best known as the handbook for anyone who wants to understand the techniques used by successful community organizers from the time of its author, Saul Alinsky, to President Barack Obama. In addition, it gives insight into the philosophy of a man who we can say lived in liberty, and in so doing, anticipated 30 years ago the Tea Party movement.
Alinsky was the most successful community organizer of the 20th century. He gained notoriety in the 1930s with his organization of the Back of the Yards area in Chicago (Upton Sinclair?s Jungle). President Obama who studied and taught many of Alinsky?s ?rules? during his days as a Community Organizer in Chicago, has used many tactics found in the pages of Alinsky?s book. For example, although Candidate Obama promised to usher in an era of bi-partisan cooperation, in his actual efforts to win legislative victories and political debates he frequently chooses to use Alinksy?s 13th, and probably most famous Rule: ?Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.? [ii]
The causes that Alinsky supported made him a leftist in his time. When he supported the rights of workers to organize unions in the 1930s, he was viewed by many as a communist even though he had repeatedly condemned communism and communists in deed and in his writings. His support of civil rights and expanding economic opportunity for blacks, and his opposition to the Vietnam War also aligned him with the liberal causes of the 1960s. Yet, unlike many of his contemporaries on the left, he considered government generally inept if not corrupt. He was an early, and prescient critic of the ?War on Poverty?, when in 1964 he called it ?a prize piece of political pornography.? [iii] What is fascinating is that his emphatic claim, that he and this book are non-ideological, is essentially true. The book is focused on the pragmatic aspects of organizing and empowering the ?Have Nots? without reference to any political ideology per se.
What makes Alinsky a radical ? and someone who lived in liberty ? is his embrace of the precepts of the American Revolution. Alinksy?s central conviction is a belief ?that if people have the power to act, in the long run they will, most of the time, reach the right decisions.?[iv] His credo: ?Believing in people, the radical has the job of organizing them so that they will have the power and opportunity to best meet each unforeseeable future crisis as they move ahead in their eternal search for those values of equality, justice, freedom, peace, a deep concern for the preciousness of human life, and all those rights and values propounded by Judeo-Christianity and the democratic political tradition. ?[v]
Alinsky, however, is no more a romantic than the Founders. He embraces the complexity and contradictions that are constitutive of our humanity. He makes clear that the community organizer first and foremost is engaging in a game of power. And, the purpose of organizing the community is to gain power. To achieve this goal, the organizer must first and foremost accept the world as it is. Next, he must communicate with the community by speaking in terms of what that community knows to be true from their experience. For example, he criticizes the leaders of the anti-war movement for their vulgar speech pointing out that such actions could only reduce the ability to gain power by organizing the middle class to oppose the Vietnam War. And, finally, the community organizer must accept that human activity is driven by self-interest.
Alinsky understands and accepts that the ?Have Nots? are resigned to their lack of power, while the ?Have a Little, Want Mores? are afraid of change, fearful that they may lose what they have. And, finally, he respects the power of the ?Haves,? whether they are part of the political or corporate establishment. But then, by giving specific tactics and examples, he provides what the title of the book promises: a basic set of rules that provide a framework for successfully organizing and empowering the Have Nots. What makes the book timeless is that it is not a cook book with a prescription of what to do, but a set of distinctions and principles that can help an activist invent the next step in his or her pursuit of change. As such this book is a must read for anyone who aspires to organize a community or to be an astute observer of the game of politics.
Because of Alinksy?s support of causes associated with the Left, the biggest surprise of the book is his central belief in the primacy of the individual. Because humans by their very nature sustain their lives within a web of interdependence with other humans, it is in our self-interest to recognize that we are our brother?s keeper, says Alinsky.[vi] However, in fulfilling that imperative, Alinksy does not speak of using the coercive power of government to impose such a vision. Rather, he worked his entire life to create voluntary organizations to address the social issues of his time. He writes: ?To give people help, while denying them a significant part in the action, contributes nothing to the development of the individual. In the deepest sense it is not giving but taking?taking their dignity. Denial of the opportunity for participation is the denial of human dignity and democracy. It will not work.?[vii]
By ?walking his talk,? by showing and inspiring individuals to form voluntary organizations to right the wrongs of their respective communities, Alinsky is channeling Alexis de Toqueville. ?One hundred and thirty-five years ago,? writes Alinsky, ?Toqueville gravely warned that unless individual citizens were regularly involved in the action of governing themselves, self-government would pass from the scene.?[viii] Whether or not you agree with the causes he supported, Alinsky is a man that should be admired for showing people how to live in liberty.
His vision at the time of the writing of the book, 1971, one year before he died, was to organize the ?white middle class? whom he saw had given up its power by sinking into a state of resignation and non-participation in the life of a citizen. If he were alive today, it is reasonable to imagine that Mr. Alinksy would embrace the Tea Party movement as the awakening of the middle class. Based on his credo, and his belief that denying individuals a significant part in the action steals their dignity, I can also imagine that he would support the call for more limited government and the repeal of Obamacare.
But he would not stop there. He also would be working to invent a way for the Tea Party to direct its energy toward creating new, voluntary civic organizations to address our pressing social concerns, including providing medical care to all Americans and resolving the issue of illegal immigrants. I imagine he would do so by challenging us to live up to the founding principles of the United States including the primacy of the dignity of the individual while reminding us that we are our brother?s keeper. And, through it all, he would never waiver in his belief in the premise of the American Revolution, that a free people can be trusted to rule themselves.
In his prologue, Alinsky states the proposition thusly: ?The spirit of democracy is the idea of importance and worth in the individual, and faith in the kind of world where the individual can achieve as much of his potential as possible.?[ix] To this day, this principle makes the American experiment the most radical of all in the political organization of a society.
http://communityofliberty.org/2010/10/25/saul-alinsky-an-advocate-of-living-in-liberty/#more-200
