<<Unless i misunderstood you , you said the magazine is discriminating in what it publishes and would not publish an article unless it was consistent with the viewpoint and standards of the editorial staff.>>
Misunderstood me AND misquoted me, unfortunately. I never said "viewpoint."
By "standards," I meant nothing more than general editorial standards of relevance and interest to magazine's readers, factual correctness of the article, degree of authority of the writer, organization of subject matter, coherence, novelty, weeding out plagiarism and plagiarists, etc.
