Boy, that's an understatement. If the electorate had any idea what Obama's vision of a "fundamentally changed" country, he'd be voted out in a heartbeat. It's why he's so vulnerable when off the teleprompter. He WANTS to express his real intentions, but he can't, but occasionally it does slip, like the "you didn't build it" fiasco. The left sees their "savior", in the idea that this man can bring real fundamental change, in a hard left ideological shift, to this country. Only hardened Obama sycophants gave the debate win to the president, while the rest of the country got a good and finally open picture of the man coupled with his record. This fella that does massive fund raisers at some of the richest folks homes that there is. He even did one at the Nokia theater, yet Romney is the fella that supposed to be "out of touch"
Who's the "out of touch" candidate in this race, again?
That's why he won't go on Fox, that's why he has his questions prearranged in some of these lesser venues, that's why you have to have these debates run by folks that are more likely to be favorable to the Democrat. I that weren't the case, you'd see an approval for other newsfolks, like on Fox, moderating some of these debates. But like you said, they need to stack the deck.
Isn't it amazing that Romney is even this close if not ahead, despie this gauntlet of MSM blockading?? If the MSM were actually objective, Romney would have a double digit lead in every poll, given the state of the economy, unemployment, GDP, Debt, Deficit, and proposed tax increases, not to mention the wholly unpopular Obamacare that he railed thru congress on a completely partisan tact
