Author Topic: Then, Senator Obama after '06 Dem takeover:  (Read 1431 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Then, Senator Obama after '06 Dem takeover:
« on: November 05, 2014, 01:34:11 PM »
"If Pres Bush is stubborn, refuses to take signals from the election......."
« Last Edit: November 06, 2014, 05:54:08 PM by sirs »
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Then Senator Obama after '06 Dem takeover:
« Reply #1 on: November 06, 2014, 02:53:03 AM »
Hmmm....so....help me out here.....When Bush lost to an epic Democrat takeover in 2006, SENATOR Obama declared how it'd demonstrate some overt stubbornness if Bush were to "refuse to take signals from the election". 

Is Obama now demonstrating that supposed practice by Bush was a good thing, since he appears to be preparing to be overtly stubborn, following the recent GOP landslide?  That stubbornness, when he was referring to Bush was actually a term of endearment & support?
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Then Senator Obama after '06 Dem takeover:
« Reply #2 on: November 06, 2014, 05:17:46 PM »
Now. let's address some additional confusion coming from our sooth sayer and chief, who can apparently hear the 2/3 of people that "spoke to him."

Putting aside his specific comments regarding if Bush heard the results of the '06 election, which included the 2/3 of folks that apparently were not talking to Obama, this lingering unconstitutional plan to, with the stroke of a pen, grant psuedo-amnesty to millions of folks who entered this country illegally, during his not-so-concilliatory speech, he made reference to the fact that he's willing....NOW....to listen to what the Republicans would wish to do, but if they don't act immediately, he'll do something before the Republicans are actually sworn in.

Isn't that pretty much backwards?  The new GOP congress should be sworn in, to then discuss what the contry, via the election that just completed, would wish to do.  More political cowardice on his part, or just being his normal self centered self?
« Last Edit: November 06, 2014, 05:56:03 PM by sirs »
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Then, Senator Obama after '06 Dem takeover:
« Reply #3 on: November 07, 2014, 01:55:16 PM »
“You don’t like a particular policy or a particular president? Then argue for your position. Go out there and win an election."......Obama, Oct 17th, 2013

One could logically conclude that any attempt to push some unilateral executive order....such as amnesty to millions of immigrants who entered this country illegally, renders his comments in 2013 as .... yet another lie?
« Last Edit: November 07, 2014, 04:24:40 PM by sirs »
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Then, Senator Obama after '06 Dem takeover:
« Reply #4 on: November 07, 2014, 07:25:11 PM »
  His position has evolved, remember when he was getting elected he supported DOMA.

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Then, Senator Obama after '06 Dem takeover:
« Reply #5 on: November 07, 2014, 11:33:22 PM »
Indeed
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle