...and before the fine professor goes on one of those "You have no point" rants, the point being made was what gives Hillary this ultra high credential for being President? What the hell has she done, outside of marrying a politically saavy womanizer, who managed to become President? Titles don't make a President. Being appointed SoS isn't some "achievement". Especially when one's record at that position is a littered with utter incompotence.
The point being, is the left sees her as this Democrat beacon, that apparently requires her to be President based on..........what?? We've gone down this road many a time before, in which it was asked, respectfully I might add, as to what exactly are her accomplishments. And all we got were crickets. Folks want to rail on Carly as having supposedly "failed" in her CEO position. News flash, no one died under Fiorino's tenure, as CEO. Hillary managed to fail on a far grander scale as SoS. And that was just SoS. One can only imagine how disastrous things might get with her at President. And of course done so with arguably the greatest non-transparent administration, surpassing even Obama's. EVERYTHING will be classified as Executive privilege, and will make what took place under the guise of the Clinton Foundation, child's play