No, you should stick to what it's always been, and has never changed since the get go, the threat of WMD getting into the hands of militant Islamists, following the events of 911.
Ah, the manufactured reason. Sure, whatever you say.
Ahh, so what Kevin Pollack concluded was "manufactured". What the NIE concluded was also "manufactured". What messers France, Germany, Russian, and UN concluded were all "manufactured". Well, if you're going on record as claiming some mass global conspiracy headed by Bush, you go right ahead
Unless of course the idea is to be intellectually dishonest...
I'll leave that to you. You do it so well.
Funny, I seem to be the one sticking with consistency, and not adding layers of distortion on the primary reason we went into Iraq. Naa, I'd say that's all you
And we are there because after taking out that threat, it would have been morally reprehensible to have left the Iraqi populace in such a state, with the extreme liklihood of Iran & Syria taking over the Terrorist movement, with a brand new country to use, and it's people to abuse
Yeah. Better we abuse them.
Well, when you can actually demonstrate how we're
abusing them vs how Saddam was abusing them, then you might have a leg to stand on