Author Topic: Please, no bright lights on the Rudy marriages  (Read 2283 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Please, no bright lights on the Rudy marriages
« Reply #15 on: November 14, 2007, 02:18:42 AM »
Stalin was pretty much like Giulani, actually.
Heavy on security, paranoid about foreigners, surrounded himself with goofy advisors.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Please, no bright lights on the Rudy marriages
« Reply #16 on: November 14, 2007, 02:24:31 AM »
Yea, that's what makes them alike       ::)
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Please, no bright lights on the Rudy marriages
« Reply #17 on: November 14, 2007, 06:05:00 AM »
Moderator
Hero Member

Posts: 5581


     Re: Please, no bright lights on the Rudy marriages
? Reply #14 on: November 13, 2007, 10:59:55 PM ?     

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from: Xavier_Onassis on November 13, 2007, 10:22:23 PM
Giulani is a warmongering rightwing asshole. This was revealed by his hiring a passel of neocons that were previously rejected by Juniorbush.
His opinions on gays and abortions do not make him any sort of moderate.


 

Stalin was pretty much like Giulani, actually.
Heavy on security, paranoid about foreigners, surrounded himself with goofy advisors.


Looks like I was right. Stalin is not left enough to reach the middle .
« Last Edit: November 14, 2007, 04:33:26 PM by Plane »

The_Professor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1735
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Please, no bright lights on the Rudy marriages
« Reply #18 on: November 14, 2007, 09:37:22 AM »
I think it's a reasonably sound conclusion that David Broder, newly converted to the privacy rights of married couples when it comes to their marital relationship, is not going to be commenting further on either the Clinton marriage or the multiple Giuliani marriages.  How commendable.

This should certainly not prevent others from focusing on the Giuliani marriages.  That many Americans are fascinated by such stories and deserve to know all about them is amply demonstrated by the intensive coverage formerly devoted by Broder and the NYT to the Clinton marriage.

Actually, this barrage of marriages and the issues involved therein are important in that they demonstrate a lack of character and loyalty, traits necessary in any future President.
***************************
"Liberalism is a philosophy of consolation for western civilization as it commits suicide."
                                 -- Jerry Pournelle, Ph.D

Michael Tee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12605
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Please, no bright lights on the Rudy marriages
« Reply #19 on: November 14, 2007, 11:00:18 AM »
<<Any American who gives prioritus consideration for qualifying for the presidency to marriage has no business pretending they have qualifications to cast an informed vote.  >>

I hope nobody here is under the illusion that it is the informed voters who decide elections.