Author Topic: Pattern of deception  (Read 5287 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Pattern of deception
« Reply #45 on: December 10, 2007, 06:20:38 AM »


FDR and Churchill agreed that Hitler was dangerous which one was the "poodle".[/i]

In your last question lies the key to all your other questions - - Hitler WAS dangerous.  Neither Churchill nor FDR had to fake anything. 

Saddam was not dangerous?
Saddam was bribing the UN officials at the highest level so that he could get his oil out and his weapons bought , he damage this represents is hard to quantify , but at the same time as e was building new palaces he was complaining about how many children were dieing from the sanction program. Either by buying his way out or by our waiting them he was going to be free of the sanctions that kept him from being dangerous.

The sanctions and the no-fly zone were a boot on Saddams shoulder to keep him down and that was all the difference , or was this diffrent at all? The Germans were circumventing the Versailles treaty for military buildup years before Hitler became a factor. Saddam was circumventing and shaking of the sanctions program once free of them what would have kepthim from returning to the modus operandi he was known for most of his career?

Michael Tee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12605
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Pattern of deception
« Reply #46 on: December 10, 2007, 09:07:25 AM »
Saddam was obviously dangerous to his immediate neighbours.  He had attacked Iran and Kuwait, the first with U.S. support and approval, the second with what he thought was U.S. support and approval, due to the diplomatic ineptitude of Ambassador Glaspie and/or her bosses in the U.S. Department of State.  The notion that the U.S.A. or Great Britain had anything to fear from a gnat like Iraq or its leader is so fanciful as to be almost comical.  You would really have to be in poor shape if a little rodent like Saddam could strike fear into the hearts of your leaders, and, truth be told, he never did.  They coveted his oil and they concocted a phony excuse to go in and get it, as Britain had done in that region many times before.  This time with U.S. muscle, but the stakes (in oil) were huge - - there was enough to go around.  Where they fucked up was in their arrogance - - never dreaming the poor dumb fucking Arabs would put up the resistance they did.