Women more willing to forgive Monica scandal than Judi Giuliani's trysts

[sirs]

And again with the Rush fetish       

[Richpo64]

>>These are things YOU wish to believe. I could[n?t] care less, and it is just annoying for the rest of to hear about it, blah, blah, blah.<<

I understand your annoyance. It?s difficult for liberals to hear the truth about their hero. Once against it?s the holy water to vampires analogy. You?ve invested what faith you have in a man who?s obviously a pathological liar and serial adulterer and most probably a rapist. I believe people like you know what he is, but because he?s ?one of you? you defend the bastard even though you know it?s wrong. This is the root of BDS. Normally decent people sold their soul to the reprobate Bill Clinton simply because he was a democrat. They totally invested their person worth in him because they had been battered around for years while Republicans owned the White House. So when it became apparent Clinton was a disgrace, it was too late. They met every lie and scandal with more and more timid defenses, because they had come this far and couldn?t turn back. It twisted them emotionally. Then add their humiliation at the hands of President George W. Bush and you?ve got full blown BDS.


>> ?we can tune into Rush, and hear a professional moron rant about it.<<

Your fascination with Rush Limbaugh is disturbing.

BOO!

[Plane]

And those are just the things we know about.

"WE" there's that frog in your pocket again.

These are things YOU wish to believe. I could care less, and it is just annoying for the rest of to hear about it, blah, blah, blah.
If we want to hear about Bill Clinton and other sorts of past history, we can tune into Rush, and hear a professional moron rant about it.

You are suffering from an overdose of Limbaugh yourself. Your best friends won't tell you, but I will.

I don't much care about Giulani and his more decent sorts of philandering, either. He is a fearmonger in the thrall of NeoCons, and I will not vote for him, ever.

I think in this instance the "WE" is quite justified.
You have heard of these charges ,I have heard of these charges , I don't know where to find someone who hasn't heard of these accusations.
This particular set formed by the term "We" includes all of "us".

[The_Professor]

http://breakingnews.iol.ie/entertainment/story.asp?j=240680342&p=z4x68yx48

correction white house host

it was quite a few years back so the details do blur sometimes

Sorry Kimba, I wasn't asking you for a link, I was asking The Professor for a link to the original post.
Unless it's there and I just can't see it, which is a possibility. ;-)

Didn't think I needed it since I added where it was from, but here it is anyway:

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2007/12/17/2007-12-17_women_more_willing_to_forgive_monica_sca.html

[The_Professor]

Oral sex is a perversion to you?

With anyone other than your spouse it sure is. And, his antics extend beyond oral sex. After all, no one will ever realy look at a cigar the same way again...

[The_Professor]

And those are just the things we know about.

"WE" there's that frog in your pocket again.

These are things YOU wish to believe. I could care less, and it is just annoying for the rest of to hear about it, blah, blah, blah.
If we want to hear about Bill Clinton and other sorts of past history, we can tune into Rush, and hear a professional moron rant about it.

You are suffering from an overdose of Limbaugh yourself. Your best friends won't tell you, but I will.

I don't much care about Giulani and his more decent sorts of philandering, either. He is a fearmonger in the thrall of NeoCons, and I will not vote for him, ever.

Guiliani has so little real character it doesn't register. If he gets the Republican nomination, I will sit this one out. Probably.

[The_Professor]

LInk?

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2007/12/17/2007-12-17_women_more_willing_to_forgive_monica_sca.html

Thanks!