Sirs, she has a point. We will end up losing what minimal progress we have made in Afghanistan because we are short-shrifting it due to the "necessary" resources in Iraq.
I agree in that it's wrong that Bush doesn't reinforce the position that Usama should absolutely be a top priority. (To everyone on the left, please ignore, since its another criticism by sirs of Bush, and specific to the war, that many wish not to acknowledge, so they can keep falsely accusing me of being some kool-aide drinking Bush-can-do-no-wrong war supporter). And as Bt has referenced, NATO can send in more troops, if its deemed necesary
My point, especially given the premice that Lanya tried to spin, is that we did go into Afghanistan, we did take out all functional components, training facilities, and leadership organization of AlQeada. We sent them into holes, all over the hills, with no functional Governing defense like the Taliban. Yet somehow, it's not enough....we're supposed to institute our own method of governing and women's rights upon the Afghani Government. A position that gets consistently condemned for what we're supposedly doing in Iraq.
In other words, just another DIHD/DIHD't bashing of Bush
Poor Karzai. I expect we will find him either assassinated or leaving quickly on a Plane to the U.S. , one step ahead of the Taliban. And women in Afghanistan will be treated as less than human yet again in Afghanistan.
I seriously doubt the latter, since as long as Bush remains in office, he won't allow the Taliban to come any where near the level of primary governing body, it originally was, prior to our going in