Author Topic: Losing in Afghanistan,stalemated in Iraq,afraidofIran. I know bomb bomb Pakistan  (Read 630 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Knutey

  • Guest
http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/20080916/cm_thenation/15361232&printer=1;_ylt=AhWdQZRh9p.0.sAQOb9hUlU__8QF
How Wide Will Bush's War Be?
The Nation
40 minutes ago
The Nation -- As Andrew Bacevich tells us in the latest issue of the Atlantic, there's now a vigorous debate going on in the military about the nature of the "next" American wars and how to prepare for them. However, while military officers argue, that "next war" may already be creeping up on us.

Having, with much hoopla, launched wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, each disastrous in its own way, the Bush administration in its waning months seems intent on a slo-mo launching of a third war in the border regions of Pakistan. Almost every day now news trickles out of intensified American strikes -- by Hellfire-missile armed Predator drones, or even commando raids from helicopters -- in the Pakistani tribal areas along the Afghan border; and there is a drumbeat of threats of more to come. All of this, in turn, is reportedly only "phase one" of a three-phase Bush administration plan in which the American military "gloves" would "come off." Think of this as the green-lighting of a new version of that old Vietnam-era tactic of "hot pursuit" across national borders, or think of it simply as the latest war.

Already Pakistan's sovereignty has functionally been declared of no significance by our President, and so, without a word from Congress, the American war that already stretches from Iraq to Afghanistan is threatening to widen in ways that are potentially incendiary in the extreme. While Pakistani sources report that no significant Taliban or al-Qaeda figures have been killed in the recent series of attacks, anger in Pakistan over the abrogation of national sovereignty and, as in Afghanistan, over civilian casualties is growing.

In Iraq, 146,000 American soldiers seem not to be going anywhere anytime soon, while in Afghanistan another 33,000 embattled American troops (and tens of thousands of NATO troops), suffering their highest casualties since the Taliban fell in 2001, are fighting a spreading insurgency backed by growing anger over foreign occupation. The disintegration seems to be proceeding apace in that country as the Taliban begins to throttle the supply routes leading into the Afghan capital of Kabul, while the governor of a province just died in an IED blast. "President" Hamid Karzai was long ago nicknamed "the mayor of Kabul." Today, that tag seems ever more appropriate as the influence of his corrupt government steadily weakens.

In the meantime, in Pakistan, a new war, no less unpredictable and unpalatable than the last two, develops, as American strikes fan the flames of Pakistani nationalism. Already the Pakistani military may have fired its first warning shots at American troops. Part of the horror here is that much of the present nightmare in Afghanistan and Pakistan can be traced to the sorry U.S. relationship with Pakistan's military and its intelligence services back in the early 1980s. At that time, in its anti-Soviet jihad, the Reagan administration was, in conjunction with the Pakistanis, actively nurturing the forces that the Bush administration is now so intent on fighting. No one knows this story, this record, better than the Pakistani-born journalist and writer Tariq Ali.

As we head into our "next war," most Americans know almost nothing about Pakistan, the sixth most populous country on the planet with 200 million people, and the only Islamic state with nuclear weapons. As the Bush administration commits to playing with fire in that desperately poor land, it's time to learn. Ali has just written a riveting, needed new book, The Duel: Pakistan on the Flight Path of American Power -- published today -- that traces the U.S.-Pakistani relationship from the 1950s to late last night. In a new post at Tomdispatch.com, he writes of the Bush administration decision to widen its Afghan war, "Its effects on Pakistan could be catastrophic, creating a severe crisis within the army and in the country at large."

Like this article? Try 4 issues of The Nation at home (and online) FREE.

Copyright © 2008 The Nation
Copyright © 2008 Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved.  Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Send Feedback | Help

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
President Bush has a lot of nerve , stealing ideas from Barak H. Obama that way .

Knutey

  • Guest
President Bush has a lot of nerve , stealing ideas from Barak H. Obama that way .

Actually he stolen a lot of his good ideas lately like reducing forces in Iraq except it is only someday and McInsane wants them there another 100 years.

Michael Tee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12605
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
At some point in its quest for world domination, it is inevitable that the U.S. will get the comeuppance it has long deserved.  If Pakistan is not the place where this is going to happen, perhaps it will be in the USA's next victim after Pakistan.  No matter where the final blows are dealt, Pakistan looks like a likely and important way-station on the road to Amerikkka's Armageddon, and it might just happen that events are going to unfold a lot faster than I ever thought possible.