0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: sirs on May 01, 2010, 03:51:39 AMI dare you to find ANYWHERE where I claimed YOU were comparing supporters of this AZ law to Nazis. Good luck with thatQuote from: Universe Prince on May 01, 2010, 09:23:49 AMDid I say you claimed I was comparing supporters of the new Arizona law to Nazis? No, I did not. I merely noted you brought up the Gestapo while talking to me and telling me not to make the comparison.Yea, you noted it, as if this thread exists in a vacuum, when I've clearly made similar references to Mahone & company in other threads, making such comparisons. Yet there you are inferring I'm the one bringing it up, with the added irritation of trying to claim I was referring to you, when I clearly wasn'tQuote from: Universe Prince on May 01, 2010, 09:23:49 AMYes, but I haven't made such comparisons, and yet you were telling me not to do it. Why would I assume you were talking about people you did not mention when you were talking to me about what I should not say?a) because I have brought such comparisions up in other threads that you've been involved in, and everytime I brought them up, it was referring to the more hysterical faction, such as Cardinal Mahoneyb) it's more of a rhetorical recommendation. And if you note, you accurately reference what you shouldn't say vs the implied stop saying as if you had made such hysterical comments
I dare you to find ANYWHERE where I claimed YOU were comparing supporters of this AZ law to Nazis. Good luck with that
Did I say you claimed I was comparing supporters of the new Arizona law to Nazis? No, I did not. I merely noted you brought up the Gestapo while talking to me and telling me not to make the comparison.
Yes, but I haven't made such comparisons, and yet you were telling me not to do it. Why would I assume you were talking about people you did not mention when you were talking to me about what I should not say?
Just not going to do the added work, if its not going to accomplish anything
Quote from: sirs on May 01, 2010, 03:51:39 AMYou HAVE made references that pointing out this law giving AZ law enforcement more authority, supported by the state, to enforce what the Fed should be, but hasn't been to any substantive extent, is supposedly an opinion.Quote from: Universe Prince on May 01, 2010, 09:23:49 AMThat is not what I said was an opinion. I explained myself on this one already.Yes, you have, and it was clearly referencing how its an opinion to claim that AZ's law is doing what the Fed isn't. and that's exactly what I've said since the get go
You HAVE made references that pointing out this law giving AZ law enforcement more authority, supported by the state, to enforce what the Fed should be, but hasn't been to any substantive extent, is supposedly an opinion.
That is not what I said was an opinion. I explained myself on this one already.
Now that's interesting, since this law merely provides state support to enforcing existing FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW.
It's not some new immigration law,
so how you can argue the one, but have little concern for the other (especially having critized it on a myriad of other occasions is beyond me.
But go for it, how is this new law "bad", when Congress has already given authority to every state in helping to enforce existing federal immigration law.?? ESPECIALLY given the fact that they've now tweaked the wording of "lawful contact" to appease those focused on semantics