Author Topic: Sarah Palin tweets  (Read 1504 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

R.R.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1128
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Sarah Palin tweets
« on: November 29, 2010, 12:06:51 PM »
Inexplicable: I recently won in court to stop my book "America by Heart" from being leaked,but US Govt can't stop Wikileaks' treasonous act?
17 minutes ago via Twitter for BlackBerry?

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Sarah Palin tweets
« Reply #1 on: November 29, 2010, 01:19:57 PM »
This means simply that Palin and her ghostwritten book is of less interest than Wikileaks.

That must really upset this silly, vain woman.

She has to be the bride at every wedding and the corpse at every funeral, it appears.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

kimba1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8013
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Sarah Palin tweets
« Reply #2 on: November 29, 2010, 03:56:23 PM »
I find sarah a very attractive, but got no interest in her book

Christians4LessGvt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11139
    • View Profile
    • "The Religion Of Peace"
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Sarah Palin tweets
« Reply #3 on: November 29, 2010, 06:18:47 PM »
Serious Questions about the Obama Administration's
Incompetence in the Wikileaks Fiasco


by Sarah Palin on Monday, November 29, 2010 at 2:17pm

We all applaud the successful thwarting of the Christmas-Tree Bomber and hope our
government continues to do all it can to keep us safe. However, the latest round of
publications of leaked classified U.S. documents through the shady organization called
Wikileaks raises serious questions about the Obama administration?s incompetent handling
of this whole fiasco.

First and foremost, what steps were taken to stop Wikileaks director Julian Assange from distributing
this highly sensitive classified material especially after he had already published material not once
but twice in the previous months?

Assange is not a "journalist," any more than the "editor" of al Qaeda's new English-language
magazine Inspire is a "journalist." He is an anti-American operative with blood on his hands.

His past posting of classified documents revealed the identity of more than 100 Afghan sources
to the Taliban. Why was he not pursued with the same urgency we pursue al Qaeda and Taliban
leaders?


What if any diplomatic pressure was brought to bear on NATO, EU, and other allies to disrupt
Wikileaks? technical infrastructure? Did we use all the cyber tools at our disposal to permanently
dismantle Wikileaks? Were individuals working for Wikileaks on these document leaks investigated?
Shouldn?t they at least have had their financial assets frozen just as we do to individuals who provide
material support for terrorist organizations?

Most importantly, serious questions must also be asked of the U.S. intelligence system. How was
it possible that a 22-year-old Private First Class could get unrestricted access to so much highly
sensitive information?
And how was it possible that he could copy and distribute these files
without anyone noticing that security was compromised?

The White House has now issued orders to federal departments and agencies asking them to
take immediate steps to ensure that no more leaks like this happen again. It's of course important
that we do all we can to prevent similar massive document leaks in the future. But why did the
White House not publish these orders after the first leak back in July? What explains this strange
lack of urgency on their part?

We are at war. American soldiers are in Afghanistan fighting to protect our freedoms.
They are serious about keeping America safe. It would be great if they could count on their
government being equally serious about that vital task.

- Sarah Palin
"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" - Ronald Reagan - June 12, 1987

kimba1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8013
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Sarah Palin tweets
« Reply #4 on: November 29, 2010, 07:25:26 PM »
not bad
sarah has some bite to her, but she has a very short or selective memory about classified records being so easy to get. during 9-11 I recall 22 laptops missing from the CIA. and the word classified has varying definitions. also those docs to us is shocking ,but to the diplomatic community it`s more of a confirmation of thier own data. which is still very bad.

Christians4LessGvt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11139
    • View Profile
    • "The Religion Of Peace"
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Sarah Palin tweets
« Reply #5 on: November 29, 2010, 07:49:57 PM »
not bad
sarah has some bite to her, but she has a very short or selective memory about classified records being so easy to get. during 9-11 I recall 22 laptops missing from the CIA.

Obama is President NOW....all this Blame Bush crap is getting old.
Well so and so years ago did the same thing...
Who gives a shit...Obama is in charge NOW
And just as Bush was blamed for crap under his watch...
so should Obama get blamed without belittling the mistakes by saying "well so and so did..."
"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" - Ronald Reagan - June 12, 1987

kimba1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8013
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Sarah Palin tweets
« Reply #6 on: November 29, 2010, 08:26:17 PM »
I didn`t think of bush, i was thinking government security in general.

I don`t recall ever blaming bush of anything here
hell I gave him credit for keeping employment stable during his watch.


Christians4LessGvt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11139
    • View Profile
    • "The Religion Of Peace"
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Sarah Palin tweets
« Reply #7 on: November 29, 2010, 09:05:49 PM »
I didn`t think of bush, i was thinking government security in general.
I don`t recall ever blaming bush of anything here

Ok Kimba I guess I mistook when you stated
"during 9-11 I recall 22 laptops missing from the CIA"
Bush was President during 9-11.
"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" - Ronald Reagan - June 12, 1987

kimba1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8013
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Sarah Palin tweets
« Reply #8 on: November 29, 2010, 09:18:37 PM »
I don`t blame people for showing up for work___period.


I was blaming CIA and ton of other people, but not someone whose job is not actively overseeing such thing.

true a president is in charge but it`s not his job to ACTIVELY oversee it

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: Sarah Palin tweets
« Reply #9 on: November 29, 2010, 09:19:43 PM »
Perhaps blaming the President for things they do not control, is a bad idea.

Bush didn't lose the laptops. CIA staffers did.

Obama didn't hack the computers where the wiki-leaks documents resided. Some dipshit private did.

Odds are pretty good that whatever protocols, whether it was keeping laptops secure or computer servers secure, were implemented by bureaucrats who could care less who is President.

It's hard to tame the beast.






kimba1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8013
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Sarah Palin tweets
« Reply #10 on: November 29, 2010, 09:44:02 PM »
bt
got it right, except I would but less blame on bureacrats and more on just stupidity.

 losing(not stolen) 22 laptop by people allowed to hold them.

I not sure I want to findout if these people were cleared.


Christians4LessGvt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11139
    • View Profile
    • "The Religion Of Peace"
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Sarah Palin tweets
« Reply #11 on: November 29, 2010, 10:24:02 PM »
"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" - Ronald Reagan - June 12, 1987

kimba1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8013
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Sarah Palin tweets
« Reply #12 on: November 29, 2010, 11:48:13 PM »
that only means the president gonna have to cleaup the mess.

got nothing to do with prevention beforehand

now if the president did nothing to stop this from happening in the future then it`s on him.

but I did state previous security problems,so maybe prevention may not be possible yet