Is there such a thing as unforcible rape?

[sirs]

riiiiiiiight, that so explains why you thru my name into responding to Cu's post, despite my already having answered your "questions"   

So....gonna answer my question?.......How would I be "aiding her" by my criticising her idiotic hyperbole as nothing more than hyperbole??

[BT]

Right. How long did it take you to get to that declaration.

[sirs]

Lemme try again.......How would I be "aiding her", since that's what you've said I'm doing, by my criticising her idiotic hyperbole as nothing more than hyperbole?? That HAS been my "endgame" since the beginning  "....informing folks the state of the Democrats' latest hyperbolic attack, not to mention get a listing of what rapes aren't forcible".  Took all of reply #7 to get to that "declaration"

[BT]

So when DWS accuses the GOP wanting to change the definition of rape, would a logical expectation for her would be that the GOP would rise up in defense of their position whatever it is, and thus take away time (deflecting) from hammering Obama about the economy?

Much like your post did.

Next.

[sirs]

If you don't, or can't answer the question, fine.  Just say so in the 1st place   

[BT]

If you don't, or can't answer the question, fine.  Just say so in the 1st place   

So much for your reading comprehension.

[Plane]

When It Comes To Rape, I Would Guess That Force Is The Bit That Most Makes It Objectionable.

[sirs]

If you don't, or can't answer the question, fine.  Just say so in the 1st place    

So much for your reading comprehension.

Yea, I don't do riddles, or questions in answering questions.  I like simple straightforward answers to simple questions.  Lemme know if you ever plan on formulating one

[BT]

Sorry for the complexity. DWS wanted the GOP off on a wild goose chase.

There is no need to redefine rape when the real issue seems to be a defining of benefits under ObamaCare. The defining of the criminal act of rape is usually legislated and penalized under state code, as it should be.

Does that add clarity to the situation for those who took the time to answer Sirs query?

Next

[sirs]

No, since it doesn't demonstrate anything remotely in how "sirs was aiding DWS".  That simple question still remains strangely unaddressed.  Go figure

[BT]

Sorry. Can't make it plainer than i already have. I guess i could have the four year old grandson write a reply but alas he is asleep.

[sirs]

Sorry. Can't make it plainer than i already have.

Yea, as plain as DWS does in fact.  Yea, I think you're done.  In fact, the 4 year old might actually do a better job than either you or DWS

[BT]

DWS's remarks weren't plain at all, they were misleading. So your touted reading comprehension fails you again.

[sirs]

DWS's remarks weren't plain at all, they were misleading.

How ironic.....so were yours.  Again, go figure.