Author Topic: Senate has no problem voting down Obama's budget  (Read 649 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Senate has no problem voting down Obama's budget
« on: May 16, 2012, 08:16:40 PM »
WOW, what another stunning embarrasing moment for team Obama, as the Senate, for the 2nd year in a row, voted unanimously in its defeat.....99-0

So, let's recap:

- Senate has not even brought forth a budget in 3 years (run by the Dems)
- President's budget has been unanimously voted down by virtually every Democrat in congress
- ONLY the GOP is putting forth budgets, to be voted on, yet they're supposedly the ones "obstructing"
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Senate has no problem voting down Obama's budget
« Reply #1 on: May 17, 2012, 11:30:59 AM »
Not a single Senate Democrat has voted in favor of any budget for three years, even as they refuse to offer a plan of their own
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Senate has no problem voting down Obama's budget
« Reply #2 on: May 17, 2012, 07:22:30 PM »
Networks Ignore Embarrassing Political Defeat for Obama: 99-0 Defeat of President's Budget
Published: 5/17/2012

Barack Obama suffered an embarrassing defeat, Wednesday, when the U.S. Senate rejected his budget 99-0. But, one wouldn't know it on ABC or CBS. The two networks completely skipped the political setback. NBC offered a single news brief on Thursday's Today.

On that program, news reader Natalie Morales allowed, "The Senate on Wednesday rejected President Obama's 2012 budget, the second year it has rejected the President's plan." Morales didn't mention the lopsided rejection, nor did she note that the House spurned the budget 414-0 in March.

ABC's World News and Good Morning America, as well as CBS's This Morning and Evening News both skipped the story. (Evening News did feature a story on the debt ceiling debate.)

The Washington Times reported:

President Obama's budget suffered a second embarrassing defeat Wednesday, when senators voted 99-0 to reject it.

Coupled with the House's rejection in March, 414-0, that means Mr. Obama's budget has failed to win a single vote in support this year.

...

"A stunning development for the president of the United States in his fourth year in office," Mr. Sessions said of the unanimous opposition.



On March 28, the House overwhelmingly rejected Obama's budget. According to a Nexis search, the networks similarly ignored the defeat for the President.

On March 29, Morales simply noted, "House Republicans are set to pass a $3.5 trillion budget today that reflects their deficit-cutting priorities, including a plan to revamp Medicare. the proposal is expected to be dead on arrival in the Senate, setting up an election-year battle."

Times reporter Stephan Dinan explained the details of Obama's budget:

It calls for tax increases to begin to offset higher spending, and would begin to level off debt as a percentage of the economy by 2022. It would produce $6.4 trillion in new deficits over that time.

How extreme must a budget be to face complete rejection, even by Democrats? Luckily for Obama, a compliant media skipped the story.
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Senate has no problem voting down Obama's budget
« Reply #3 on: May 17, 2012, 09:00:38 PM »
  Lovly bipartizenship

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Senate has no problem voting down Obama's budget
« Reply #4 on: May 17, 2012, 10:04:46 PM »
 ;)
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle