Author Topic: shifting ethics  (Read 475 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

kimba1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8020
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
shifting ethics
« on: October 22, 2012, 12:12:22 PM »
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/money/industries/health/story/2012-01-03/health-care-jobs-no-smoking/52394782/1

I believe this means in america smorkers are worst than a parent who abandone thier kids. meaning businesses don`t down down dead-beat dads but can refuse smokers.

funny thing is I`ve read as much reseach on the harmful effect of smoking not a single one has stated the severity implyed today. the data today all state heavy usage effect.

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: shifting ethics
« Reply #1 on: October 22, 2012, 01:48:08 PM »
In a hospital where no smoking is permitted, smokers are likely to take more timeout for a smoke outside the building or to sneak a smoke inside. This suggests that they do less work than non-smokers. Being a deadbeat dad does not one's job performance as much as smoking might. Insurance regulations also have nothing against dead-beat dads, but they do agaisnt smokers.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."