NY Times Editorial Board: "Obama threatening fundamental freedoms of the press"

[Christians4LessGvt]

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/22/opinion/another-chilling-leak-investigation.html?_r=0

[sirs]

Strange how the Times has been absent, all this time, on Obama's folk threatening the 2nd & 4th amendments.  Typical leftest mindset, ignoring clear constitutional boundries is ok ........ until it hits too close to home

[Xavier_Onassis]

This is all B U L L S H I T!
No one is denying anyone the right to say anything, they were just questioning that the money used for the anti-Obama "patriot" crap should be deductible.

And clearly, it should not be.

[sirs]

Priceless

[Plane]

This is all B U L L S H I T!
No one is denying anyone the right to say anything, they were just questioning that the money used for the anti-Obama "patriot" crap should be deductible.

And clearly, it should not be.

Perhaps soon there will be an American Presedent who isn't such an extreme liberal.
Then when IRS agents want to kiss up to the boss , they will handicap organisations that feature "Social" and "Progressive" and other key words of the ilk.

If you can't imagine the reversal , you can't really be fair.

[Xavier_Onassis]

Face it, the GOP is a dwindling bunch of old angry White guys, most of them manipulated by the money of guys like the Kochs.

They have the right to say and publish any damn thing they choose. But to say that they ought to be able to DEDUCT it as some sort of charity, as if they were giving sight to the blind or curing disease, that is just WRONG.

So fuck 'em, this is just like Benghazi, going nowhere.

[Plane]

Face it, the GOP is a dwindling bunch of old angry White guys, most of them manipulated by the money of guys like the Kochs.

They have the right to say and publish any damn thing they choose. But to say that they ought to be able to DEDUCT it as some sort of charity, as if they were giving sight to the blind or curing disease, that is just WRONG.

So fuck 'em, this is just like Benghazi, going nowhere.

So practicly giving tax subsidy to the political friends of Obama is OK with you?

I always expected President Obama to make Preaident Bush look good , and he has .

But he has started to go far beyond this and is starting to make President Nixon look good, ......

...I would have hardly thought it possible..

[Xavier_Onassis]

I do not think that there are organizations comparable to the Astroturf 'baggers.
I don't think that ANY political advocacy group should get a non tax status.

But this is a stupid argument. Again, Fuck the goddamned 'baggers and the horses they rode in on. Phony patriots and dupes, every last one of them.

[Christians4LessGvt]

This is all B U L L S H I T!No one is denying anyone the right to say anything, they were just questioning that the money used for the anti-Obama "patriot" crap should be deductible. And clearly, it should not be.

Translation:
Soros Anti-Bush Hate = Ok and tax deductable
Anti-Obama "patriot" crap = Not ok and should not be tax deductable

[sirs]

D'oh.........spot on, C     

[Plane]

I do not think that there are organizations comparable to the Astroturf 'baggers.
I don't think that ANY political advocacy group should get a non tax status.

But this is a stupid argument. Again, Fuck the goddamned 'baggers and the horses they rode in on. Phony patriots and dupes, every last one of them.

I can agree with part of this.

The rules are needlessly complex and hard to use fairly.

If no one were getting this tax break , it could not be unfairly withheld from a few.