Her son was a nutcase to obeys The Voices and she lets him take those guns out and shoot them.
IF that were the case, that she KNEW he was a loon, and she "let him take guns", then she should be prosecuted. So, please demonstrate that scenario with some facts. I'll start it off for you:
Fact 1 - *
insert proof she knew her son to be certifiably insane psychopath, and ignored it*
Fact 2 - *
insert proof here that knowing son to be homicidal, gave him guns to use*
Fact 3 - *
insert anything here that supports the above 2 facts*
That is a pretty good reason to at least prevent her from giving them to her son. Had this been done, twenty three children would be alive today.
And had their been someone on site with a CCW, all 23 children would be alive today as well. Not to mention, he could have illegally obtained firearms elsewhere. We can play this speculation game all night. What we WONT do, as a country, is to strip someone who hasn't done anything illegal, of their constitutional rights....period
You want to roll with the child killer, fine with me. I consider this to be crazy.
No, the crazy part is believing we should revoke someone else's constitutional rights based soley on a relative
