Micro aggressions?? How about macro idiocy

[sirs]

There's a whole hearted fascist movement sweeping academia, and being propelled into the populace as well.....this transparent effort to both silence critics of the latest PC fad or liberal platform, as well as trying to push racial hostility even further than what's transpired under this President's policies & rhetoric.  The term is "micro aggression".  Apparently, these are aggressions that people (whites) produce, that they don't realize are horribly offensive, and can send some minority into a postal-like state of uncontrolled rage.  Oh wait......its simply just found to be offensive.  Burning an American flag is about as offensive as one can get.  Doesn't seem to be anything wrong with that.....just someone exercising their 1st amendment, right?  So, what's the difference?  The difference is hypocrisy.

But let's top that hypocrisy with idiocy.  Recently, 3 black females accused a group of white guys of assaulting them, based on their race, on a NY bus.  They claimed they were targeted for their color, attacked, and bystanders seemed to look on.  Even received a supportive tweet from Clinton  ahhh....but.....

*roll the tape*

....the bus video, that they apparently were not aware of, clearly demonstrates precisely the opposite.  They initiated the insults....they initiated the assaults.....and now they are being charged for assault and filing a false police report.

But it gets better......apparently there's a letter of support FOR THE HOAX, from what I believe is a professor, claiming that it was a justified act, since it brings to light the issue of micro-aggressions, that only blacks can catch.  Get that?  The criminal hoax of falsely claiming being attacked, based on race alone, is jusified because it brings to light the apparent ever growing problem of micro-aggression, against the black community, on the whole

You really can't make this stuff up.  I'll keep digging to find out who this person is, who supports the criminal hoax

[sirs]

Located the idiot...I mean professor; Sami Schalk, assistant professor, Albany university’s English department.  She goes so far as to add "My white students have said this has opened up conversations.  Things that are inadvertent, small, but that these white students have no experience with, not being a person of color on this campus.”  She was apparently concerned that the "women’s detractors had failed to consider the prejudice and “racialized language” the young women may have encountered on campus or before the bus ride that could have played a role in provoking the fight."

In other words, provoking an attack, while falsely claiming as being attacked themselves, because of their skin color, is a good thing

[kimba1]

this is why MGTOW and all it's misogyny is growing. I will not lift a finger to stop it

[sirs]

I don't follow Kimba     

[kimba1]

The point here is women are baiting men to react and I just Named a group of men who have decided to not bother with them

Men Going Thier Own Way---MGTOW

I find some of them extreme but this post is not exactly hurting MGTOW cause

[sirs]

Ahhh, I see