FINALLY....

[sirs]

It's nice to see, what are generally democrat sychophants and worshippers of anything everything Clinton, finally recognizing the scope of her lying, as highlighed by the lastest State Dept IG Report.  Now, her cool-aide drinking aides and supporters will cling to the talking points about how "other SoS did the same thing" (LIE), and how she has been the "most transparent" (LIE), and how she has been "fully cooperative" (LIE), but its nice to see folks, even at MSNBC no longer trying to defend the indefensible, when it comes to her e-mail debacle & reckless disregard of our most sensitive intel & foreign assets

[Plane]

What difference does it make at this point?


It is in the past.
https://youtu.be/dZfGTL2PY3E

"the past can hurt"

[Christians4LessGvt]

if you guys get bored...you may find this fresh depo interesting....it's long...124 pages....but it really exposes how Hillary was willing to do almost anything to circumvent the law about gvt documents even if it meant allowing breaches to our most secret documents. She is completely reckless, lawless, and out of control. Trump people should for sure study this and get him ready to attack her on these insane actions she took that placed our national security at risk:

http://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/jw-v-state-lukens-testimony-01363/

[sirs]

Wow.......again this is the Democrat's go-to network

[Plane]

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/clinton-email-headache-is-about-to-get-worse/ar-BBtAv0r?li=BBnb7Kz

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), her primary opponent, has stubbornly refused to address the issue, memorably declaring in October that people "are sick and tired of hearing about your damn emails."

Recent events have disproved that claim.

And as she gears up for a general election, Clinton has to expect that Donald Trump won't be as kind.

Sanders "didn't pick up on the emails, which I think was a big mistake," the presumptive GOP nominee said on "Fox and Friends" last weekend.

"I'm going to pick up bigly."

It may be good that Hillary has Sanders as an understudy.

[sirs]

...nor did a VRWC put a secret unsecured server in her basement.  That's all her....analogus to Obamacare being all Democrat

The ironic thing is if Sanders had made Clinton's reckless judgement, both referencing Benghazi and her criminal-like actions involving how she set up her e-mail system, as a centerpiece in criticising his primary opponent for the Democratic Presidential nomination, he could actually be running away with this election......from a delegate standpoint

[Xavier_Onassis]

The ironic thing is if Sanders had made Clinton's reckless judgement, both referencing Benghazi and her criminal-like actions involving how she set up her e-mail system, as a centerpiece in criticising his primary opponent for the Democratic Presidential nomination, he could actually be running away with this election......from a delegate standpoint

================================================
Now you can read minds.
The delegates have heard all this, why would it change their vote?
They are Democrats, they don't think like you.
They read the same rubbish your read, they just know that Benghazi is not an issue for Democrats. And they all have their own personal computer accounts.

Bernie is very upstanding and sticks to the real issues. That should appeal to them more  that all your Limbaugh crap.

[sirs]

It doesn't require reading minds....simple logic suffices.  The super delegates can change their minds.  It's not unprecedented...especially if the FBI were to recommend an indictment.