Author Topic: The Rip-Off of Iraq's Oil  (Read 686 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Michael Tee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12605
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
The Rip-Off of Iraq's Oil
« on: June 15, 2007, 11:28:40 AM »
Never mentioned by the MSM:

http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/oil/2005/crudedesigns.htm

Basically a scheme for the privatization of what, under the Ba'ath Arab Socialist Party, was always the property of the people of Iraq.  Unless the American invaders are decisively driven out of Iraq and their collaborators imprisoned, exiled or executed, this huge rip-off of a Third World country's ony natural resource will proceed to line the pockets of the American ruling class.

This is a ripoff which affects all Iraqis but they are still fighting each other at the same time as some of them fight the invaders.  the mistake that some Shi'a are making is to ally themselves to the invaders.  Perhaps their leaders are of the old-fashioned collaborationists and sell-out artists, such as the late Shah of Iran or the current Saudi royal family, selling out the nation's patrimony for personal gain.  Or perhaps they don't see a nation, only a Shi'ite resource that shouldn't be shared out with Sunni anyway.

The Americans are certainly adept at exploiting local differences and worming their way in through the cracks.  But what if that's an oversimplification and the differences are irreconciliable in any event?

Somehow, for the people of the region, I think this always comes back to pan-Arabism.  Or maybe the concept of a Caliphate which takes in the powerful non-Arab peoples of the region as well - - Turks, Persians, maybe ultimately even the Jews.  As long as they are split by political, national and religious lines, the region will always be vulnerabe to predators such as Great Britain in the past and now, the USA, particularly in a unipolar world.  What they need is a visionary movement towards unity, and preferably under secular leadership.

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The Rip-Off of Iraq's Oil
« Reply #1 on: June 15, 2007, 03:02:05 PM »
Basically a scheme for the privatization of what, under the Ba'ath Arab Socialist Party, was always the property of the people of Iraq.


[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][[][][][]

Correction
Basically a scheme for the privatization of what, under the Ba'ath Arab Socialist Party, was always the property of Saddam Hussein.


Priviteisation would be a good idea , but where is it written that the Iriqui's must choose against social ownership?

Sure they had a bad experience with social owership being an orewellian term for Saddams property , but why would the let this cloud their judgement now?

If they want it socialy owned , let them make the mistake for themselves.




Quote
  Somehow, for the people of the region, I think this always comes back to pan-Arabism.  Or maybe the concept of a Caliphate which takes in the powerful non-Arab peoples of the region as well - - Turks, Persians, maybe ultimately even the Jews.  As long as they are split by political, national and religious lines, the region will always be vulnerabe to predators such as Great Britain in the past and now, the USA, particularly in a unipolar world.  What they need is a visionary movement towards unity, and preferably under secular leadership.

I thoght you were not a belever in the "Caliphate" MT?

Michael Tee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12605
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The Rip-Off of Iraq's Oil
« Reply #2 on: June 15, 2007, 03:56:16 PM »
<<Basically a scheme for the privatization of what, under the Ba'ath Arab Socialist Party, was always the property of Saddam Hussein. >>

In that case, Saddam must have been an exceptionally generous man, because every Iraqi who qualified for university got a free university education courtesy of the Iraqi oil revenues, which you tell me actually belonged to Saddam himself.  Since you are always raving about the charitable donations of rich Americans, perhaps you could show me one comparable in generosity to Saddam, who has paid for the university education of every university student in the nation.

<<I thoght you were not a belever in the "Caliphate" MT?>>

I wasn't, plane, I was always a believer in "Pan-Arabism," but as its limits become more apparent, I feel a secular Caliphate that draws in Turks and Persians as well as Arabs might be the only protection the region will have have from American aggression.