Author Topic: Another sweet innocent Grand Old Pervert to soon bite the dust  (Read 1278 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Knutey

  • Guest
Another sweet innocent Grand Old Pervert to soon bite the dust
« on: September 02, 2007, 01:07:58 AM »
They just keep on cumming dont they?

http://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com/2007/08/wholl-be-next-republican-hypocrite-to.html

Not that it really matters who. Underneath the pious hypocracy of nearly all the 48+ Senators and 200+ Grand Old Perv Congrassmen beat the hearts of total twisted creeps.
Sept. 1-3, 2007 -- GOP will not be able to put Sen. Craig gay sex incident behind them
publication date: Sep 2, 2007
    
Previous |
Sept. 1-3, 2007 -- GOP will not be able to put Sen. Craig gay sex incident behind them

GOP spinmeisters are spreading the word that the GOP has better days ahead of it after Idaho's Republican Senator Larry Craig announced his plans to resign his seat on Sept. 30. However, the Washington rumor mill is rife with speculation that as many as three more GOP senators, including one holding a high leadership position, will soon be outed as gay. One of the senators is married while another divorced senator is now engaged to his former Senate staffer. The third senator is unmarried.

Two of the senators are from states with Republican governors, which means that any resignations will not result in a pickup of a seat for the Democrats.

However, in what could be very bad news for the Republicans, all three senators in question have adopted strongly anti-gay rights agendas and are currently sitting in seats not previously considered in play. Their outing may result in voter backlash handing the Democrats three seats not counted upon. Republicans face the possibility of losing open seats in Colorado and Virginia. The FBI investigation of Alaska's Ted Stevens could put his seat in play. South Dakota's Democratic incumbent, Tim Johnson, recovering from a stroke, is riding a wave of popularity, putting his seat out of the reach of a GOP pickup. The only vulnerable Democrat is Louisiana's Mary Landrieu, who will likely suffer from the depopulation of New Orleans of many of its African American voters in the wake of hurricane Katrina.

Other possible Democratic pickups are in Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, and Oregon. If the Democrats hold on to all of their seats, and pick up the Virginia and Colorado open seats and defeat GOP incumbents in the five states mentioned above, that gives them a net gain of seven seats, with a total of 58. If the outing of the three GOP senators occurs, that will give the Democrats a potential for 61 seats, with an added plum. One of the suspected gay Republican senators is running for re-election along with his GOP colleague in a rare occurrence. If a sex scandal results, the Democrats could grab the other seat, giving them 62 seats in the Senate or 61 if they eject "Independent Democrat" Joe Lieberman from their caucus.

In the case of one of the suspected senators, there is speculation that his military record was altered to reflect an honorable discharge, when, in fact, he may have been separated from the service for reasons of homosexual behavior. The senator in question has never brought attention to his short military enlistment and his record may have been cleaned up by two former Republican senators for whom he worked. The senator in question also poses a potential huge embarrassment for the Bush administration.

In addition, the Pamela Martin & Associates (PMA) scandal involving Louisiana Republican Senator David Vitter is far from over. A number of gay Republicans in Washington are upset that Craig was treated far more differently than Vitter, who admitted he procured the services of PMA female escorts. Vitter's peculiar sexual habits involving diapers, defecation, and spanking may also extend to other top Republican officials. There may be some further embarrassing disclosures in this scandal, which has already claimed Bush's US Agency for International Development director, Randall Tobias, as a victim.

http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/articles/20070902
« Last Edit: September 02, 2007, 08:39:39 AM by Knutey »

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16143
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: Anopther sweet innocent Grand Old Pervert to soon bite the dust
« Reply #1 on: September 02, 2007, 01:34:12 AM »
If i were one of the three GOP senators, i would come out of the closet and preempt those on the dem side (bedroom police all) who think sexual orientation is fair game for political gain.





Knutey

  • Guest
Re: Anopther sweet innocent Grand Old Pervert to soon bite the dust
« Reply #2 on: September 02, 2007, 08:09:07 AM »
If i were one of the three GOP senators, i would come out of the closet and preempt those on the dem side (bedroom police all) who think sexual orientation is fair game for political gain.






You perverted  dumbshits still dont get it. It isnt sexual orientation, which is a persons own business, but the hypocracy of denying the right to others while relishing in the most disgusting & sordid elements of it for yourselfs. It seems that if you scratch the surface of any Rw pious Repub, you find a debauched perv underneath.
Again , homosexuals are not the perverts, you guys are.

Universe Prince

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3660
  • Of course liberty isn't safe; but it is good.
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Another sweet innocent Grand Old Pervert to soon bite the dust
« Reply #3 on: September 02, 2007, 11:06:37 AM »
Knute, you may be the most naive angry cynic I've ever encountered.
Your reality, sir, is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever.
--Hieronymus Karl Frederick Baron von Munchausen ("The Adventures of Baron Munchausen" [1988])--

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16143
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: Another sweet innocent Grand Old Pervert to soon bite the dust
« Reply #4 on: September 02, 2007, 01:34:40 PM »
Quote
till dont get it. It isnt sexual orientation, which is a persons own business, but the hypocracy of denying the right to others while relishing in the most disgusting & sordid elements of it for yourselfs.

Complete and utter nonsense.

Your own statements indicate your viewpoint about homosexuality, calling elemens of it disgusting and sordid.

If it were about DOMA or the proposed Marriage Amendment you would focus on that and not focus on the sexuality of certain legislators.

Just because you are black does not menan you are in favor of reparatiopns.

And just because you are gay does not mean you favor redefining century old traditions.



sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Another twisted knute piece
« Reply #5 on: September 02, 2007, 02:00:47 PM »
If it were about DOMA or the proposed Marriage Amendment you would focus on that and not focus on the sexuality of certain legislators.  Just because you are black does not menan you are in favor of reparatiopns.  And just because you are gay does not mean you favor redefining century old traditions.

BINGO !!
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Knutey

  • Guest
Re: Another sweet innocent Grand Old Pervert to soon bite the dust
« Reply #6 on: September 02, 2007, 02:08:19 PM »
Quote
till dont get it. It isnt sexual orientation, which is a persons own business, but the hypocracy of denying the right to others while relishing in the most disgusting & sordid elements of it for yourselfs.

Complete and utter nonsense.

Your own statements indicate your viewpoint about homosexuality, calling elemens of it disgusting and sordid.

If it were about DOMA or the proposed Marriage Amendment you would focus on that and not focus on the sexuality of certain legislators.

Just because you are black does not menan you are in favor of reparatiopns.

And just because you are gay does not mean you favor redefining century old traditions.




You keep missing the point , probly because you need to to keep your sanity or what little is left of it. And again I am not singling out hohmo's . I am as disgusted by your straight hypocrits like David Vitter as well. Once again it is not gays that are pervs it is you guys.
And it is because you pretend to be better when you are really far , far worse.
You prove your homophobia by thinking  that only parts of homosexualilty are disgusting and sordid when all sexuality has sordid & disgusting elements to it like Vitter's shitloving.
http://wonkette.com/politics/dept'-of-feces-fetishists/diaperman-david-vitter-likes-his-diapers-277270.php


DOMA is only the most obvious expression of your homophobia.
That black shit is just more sand thrown in the eyes of truth.
You are the utterly nonsensical  ones with all your family values claptrap.
« Last Edit: September 02, 2007, 02:15:40 PM by Knutey »

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Another sweet innocent Grand Old Pervert to soon bite the dust
« Reply #7 on: September 02, 2007, 03:07:08 PM »
I wonder how preventing Adam from marrying Steve is defending marriage? Does it mean that Bob and Alice are no longer married?

No, it does not. Likewise it does not prevent them from having children or adopting them or not having them.

==========================================================
Or just that Steve might be able to name Adam as a beneficiary of his insurance?

AS I see it, only the fact that there might be more male counterparts of ugly bridesmaids' dresses taking up closet space.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Amianthus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7574
  • Bring on the flames...
    • View Profile
    • Mario's Home Page
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Another sweet innocent Grand Old Pervert to soon bite the dust
« Reply #8 on: September 02, 2007, 03:09:29 PM »
Or just that Steve might be able to name Adam as a beneficiary of his insurance?

Where is that currently prohibited?

Only thing I can think of is that some states require a wife to relinquish her claim on life insurance if it's to be assigned to someone else; not an issue with most gays, I'm sure.
Do not anticipate trouble, or worry about what may never happen. Keep in the sunlight. (Benjamin Franklin)

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Another sweet innocent Grand Old Pervert to soon bite the dust
« Reply #9 on: September 02, 2007, 03:17:15 PM »
The IRS will not allow you to treat your gay partner as a deduction as it will your wife.

You can't assign your gay partner as a beneficiary on your employer's health insurance, either, nor can you assign them the right to visit you in a hospital as you can a family member.

Why should Adam not be allowed to marry Steve?

How is banning this "defending marriage"?
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Amianthus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7574
  • Bring on the flames...
    • View Profile
    • Mario's Home Page
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Another sweet innocent Grand Old Pervert to soon bite the dust
« Reply #10 on: September 02, 2007, 03:33:27 PM »
You can't assign your gay partner as a beneficiary on your employer's health insurance, either, nor can you assign them the right to visit you in a hospital as you can a family member.

Funny, I'm looking at my beneficiary designation form right now. There is no prohibition on assigning anyone I want as beneficiary, except the previously mentioned one that my spouse has to ok it if I exclude her.

As a matter of fact, it specifically says "If I am not married, I can elect any beneficiary without consent from an outside party." Want me to scan in the document?

Don't know why you think a gay person cannot put their partner as beneficiary; I know plenty of gays that have done so. I even even know several that have had documents drawn up by lawyers allowing their partner the power to direct treatment as a spouse would in case of illness.

It's not automatic now, but that could be fixed via civil union legislation.
Do not anticipate trouble, or worry about what may never happen. Keep in the sunlight. (Benjamin Franklin)

Amianthus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7574
  • Bring on the flames...
    • View Profile
    • Mario's Home Page
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Another sweet innocent Grand Old Pervert to soon bite the dust
« Reply #11 on: September 02, 2007, 03:35:09 PM »
Why should Adam not be allowed to marry Steve?

And, BTW, I not against this anyway.

So much for your "obvious" conclusions.
Do not anticipate trouble, or worry about what may never happen. Keep in the sunlight. (Benjamin Franklin)