Author Topic: Ohio's new voting system  (Read 1062 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Lanya

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3300
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Ohio's new voting system
« on: March 01, 2008, 02:47:04 PM »
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=87809221

Ohio's New Voting System Revs Up for Primary

by Pam Fessler

Listen Now [4 min 34 sec] add to playlist
 
A ballot count official and supervisor perform a logic and accuracy test with a high speed scanner.
Enlarge

Tony Dejak

A ballot count official and supervisor perform a logic and accuracy test with a high speed scanner Feb. 14 in Cleveland. The state's most populous county will use a new voting system in Ohio's presidential primary. AP
 
 
 

    * To ensure that Cuyahoga County voters understand how to use the paper ballots, the board of elections has created this tutorial video.

 
 
 
Wisconsin voters used paper ballots in their Feb. 19 primary.
Enlarge

Joshua Lott

Wisconsin voters used paper ballots in their Feb. 19 primary ? just as Ohio voters will do on March 4. Getty Images
 
 

All Things Considered, February 29, 2008 ? Ohio's vote next Tuesday will be crucial in the Democratic presidential primary race, but there could be a delay in getting a final tally.

The state is making major changes in the way its residents cast ballots, especially in its most populous county, Cuyahoga, which includes the city of Cleveland.

In December, the county was directed by Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner to scrap its touch-screen voting system, which had been plagued with problems, and to replace it with optically scanned paper ballots.

Now, in the final days before the primary, Cuyahoga County's new election director, Jane Platten, is trying to prepare for every contingency. "The other day, I'm sitting here thinking, 'Oh God, it's going to be damp and it's going to be cold. We need to test cold, damp ballots.' "

So, she had her staff put a box of ballots outside for three hours before running them through one of the 15 optical scan machines that will be used on primary night. The county has been testing the machines almost daily. Staffers have also ripped ballots and spilled coffee on them ? anything to anticipate what might gum up the works.

Platten has reason for concern. The county had to completely revamp its voting system in only two months. Secretary of State Brunner ordered the change, in part because Cuyahoga had huge voting problems in 2004 and '06, including lost memory cards and challenged results.

"We've been through so much in this county. Anything that we can test to prevent bad things from happening is the way we should do it now," Platten says.

The effort has been extraordinary. More than 6,000 old punchcard machines were taken out of storage and retrofitted, so voters can basically use them as desks for marking their paper ballots. More than 4,000 different ballot types had to be prepared, and 7,000 poll workers had to be trained on an entirely new system.

While all that has been going on, thousands of the county's 1 million registered voters have been voting early. Residents have been encouraged to cast absentee ballots to avoid long lines and polling place problems on Tuesday. Everyone expects a huge turnout, in part because the Democratic race between Illinois Sen. Barack Obama and New York Sen. Hillary Clinton is so close.

Candice Hoke directs the Center for Election Integrity at Cleveland State University. She thinks Cuyahoga County has done a good job so far preparing for the primary, but she says there are bound to be some problems.

"Will there be errors, particularly at the polling locations? Likely. Logistics? Probably. We've gotten better and better, but that's still going to be a challenge," she says.

Hoke's biggest concern is a plan to pick up some ballots in the middle of the day. The county wants to get a jumpstart on counting votes, because scanning all that paper will take a lot longer than tallying votes on electronic touch-screen machines. In fact, no one expects primary results from Cuyahoga until sometime Wednesday. But Hoke says collecting ballots midday means some polling will have to shut down, no matter how briefly.

"Voting succession, voting interruption and possibly disenfranchising voters who can't stay ? that is a huge concern," she says.

Also of concern is whether voters will fill in their paper ballots correctly. The county didn't have enough time to purchase optical scan machines for each polling place, which would have helped to detect errors on the spot, giving voters a chance to correct them.

"Which is why you've got to check over your ballot very carefully before you submit it," Jocelyn Travis says. She is the director of Ohio Votes, which helps nonprofit groups guide their clients through the voting system. Travis and others are trying to get the word out to voters to fill in the ovals and not to circle them, and not to vote for more than one candidate per race.

"Know what's on the ballot. Know if you have any questions or problems, there's someone inside that can assist you, and there are also volunteers on the outside ready to assist you," Travis says. In fact, teams of voting rights attorneys from around the country will be in Cuyahoga County next week monitoring the polls.

But the changes aren't confined to Cuyahoga. Secretary of State Brunner instructed election officials to provide paper ballots to any Ohio voter who requests one. She thinks electronic voting machines are too insecure and wants them gone statewide by November. Not everyone's happy with the switch to paper, but Brunner told a town hall meeting in Akron this week that she's trying to avoid another voting meltdown.

"Whatever happens in Cuyahoga seems to reflect on the rest of the state of Ohio, and I want my state to be successful, and I want the rest of the country to quit looking at Ohio as a pariah," she said. Brunner knows that a smooth vote Tuesday is the key.
Planned Parenthood is America’s most trusted provider of reproductive health care.

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16143
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: Ohio's new voting system
« Reply #1 on: March 01, 2008, 02:58:52 PM »
So Ohio is planning to disenfranchise voters?

Rich

  • Guest
Re: Ohio's new voting system
« Reply #2 on: March 01, 2008, 03:15:49 PM »
I'll let you know since I'll be voting in the Democratic primary.

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16143
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: Ohio's new voting system
« Reply #3 on: March 01, 2008, 03:34:13 PM »
Republicans Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner removed from elections boards cry foul
Brunner defends vote-board moves
Friday, February 29, 2008
Joe Guillen and Mark Rollenhagen
Plain Dealer Reporters

Republicans bumped from election posts in recent weeks say Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner is carrying out a partisan campaign to get rid of dissenters.

They say they were removed for disagreeing with her viewpoints. They wonder if party affiliation played a role.

But in an interview on Thursday, Brunner, a Democrat, said her decisions were justified and not politically influenced.

Brunner, who replaced Republican Ken Blackwell last year, likened the situation to the early 1990s, when Democrats clung to their fading influence as the Ohio GOP gained power.

"This is what's happening here," she said.

An election law expert who said he hasn't reviewed Brunner's actions said it is important that Ohioans view her as being fair.

"Election management is an area where appearance is reality," said Edward Foley, professor at Ohio State University's Moritz College of Law. "It's not good enough just to be fair. You've got to be perceived as fair."

On Feb. 20, Brunner rejected the reappointment of a Republican to the Hardin County Board of Elections.

James Crates, the board's chairman, twice voted to disagree with a Brunner order that counties with touch-screen voting machines stock polls at Tuesday's primary with paper ballots.

Crates said he opposed the directive because he questioned the cost and need to offer an option since there was no problem with voting in the county.

"We voted to cooperate fully," Crates said. "I think there's always room for a little dissent."

Brunner said her directives carry the weight of law. By voting against it, Crates "violated the law," she said.

Brunner also rejected the nominations of two other Republican board members: Mary Wipert in Lawrence County and Alex Arshinkoff in Summit County.

Wipert was rejected because she was fired as the county's elections chief, Brunner said in a letter. She was accused of running partisan political activity while the director, Brunner noted.

Brunner denied Arshinkoff reappointment because of what she said were political conflicts and threats to workers.

The four-year terms of 176 board members across the state expire today. County Democratic and Republican executive committees submit nominations for the boards, which the secretary of state can accept or reject.

Brunner approved the remaining nominations.

"I have a job to do," Brunner said. "Before this, boards of elections were oftentimes a dumping ground for political appointees" to build time and acquire health insurance upon retirement.

"Now that we've moved into an era when we're using computer-based voting, I need professional people and I need partisanship to be dropped at the door so people can work together, because it's about the voters," she said.

The fourth Republican Brunner recently disciplined is Keith Cunningham, Allen County's elections director and a recent member of the state's Board of Voting Machine Examiners, which can decertify voting equipment.

On Feb. 21, Brunner fired Cunningham from the panel because he would not decertify touch-screen voting systems based on results of Brunner's report on Ohio's voting equipment, he said.

Brunner said she didn't want such a narrow view on the board.

Cunningham said he has no evidence Brunner's decision was partisan, but he added, "I think being a Republican made it easier.

"The logic expressed for removing me is so thin, there has to be something more to this."

http://www.cleveland.com/ohio/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/news/120427741377180.xml&coll=2

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Ohio's new voting system
« Reply #4 on: March 01, 2008, 07:51:04 PM »
So Ohio is planning to disenfranchise voters?

Ends justify the means
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Lanya

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3300
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Ohio's new voting system
« Reply #5 on: March 01, 2008, 11:10:34 PM »
Republicans Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner removed from elections boards cry foul
Brunner defends vote-board moves
Friday, February 29, 2008
Joe Guillen and Mark Rollenhagen
Plain Dealer Reporters

Republicans bumped from election posts in recent weeks say Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner is carrying out a partisan campaign to get rid of dissenters.

They say they were removed for disagreeing with her viewpoints. They wonder if party affiliation played a role.

But in an interview on Thursday, Brunner, a Democrat, said her decisions were justified and not politically influenced.

Brunner, who replaced Republican Ken Blackwell last year, likened the situation to the early 1990s, when Democrats clung to their fading influence as the Ohio GOP gained power.

"This is what's happening here," she said.

An election law expert who said he hasn't reviewed Brunner's actions said it is important that Ohioans view her as being fair.

"Election management is an area where appearance is reality," said Edward Foley, professor at Ohio State University's Moritz College of Law. "It's not good enough just to be fair. You've got to be perceived as fair."

On Feb. 20, Brunner rejected the reappointment of a Republican to the Hardin County Board of Elections.

James Crates, the board's chairman, twice voted to disagree with a Brunner order that counties with touch-screen voting machines stock polls at Tuesday's primary with paper ballots.

Crates said he opposed the directive because he questioned the cost and need to offer an option since there was no problem with voting in the county.

"We voted to cooperate fully," Crates said. "I think there's always room for a little dissent."

Brunner said her directives carry the weight of law. By voting against it, Crates "violated the law," she said.

Brunner also rejected the nominations of two other Republican board members: Mary Wipert in Lawrence County and Alex Arshinkoff in Summit County.

Wipert was rejected because she was fired as the county's elections chief, Brunner said in a letter. She was accused of running partisan political activity while the director, Brunner noted.

Brunner denied Arshinkoff reappointment because of what she said were political conflicts and threats to workers.

The four-year terms of 176 board members across the state expire today. County Democratic and Republican executive committees submit nominations for the boards, which the secretary of state can accept or reject.

Brunner approved the remaining nominations.

"I have a job to do," Brunner said. "Before this, boards of elections were oftentimes a dumping ground for political appointees" to build time and acquire health insurance upon retirement.

"Now that we've moved into an era when we're using computer-based voting, I need professional people and I need partisanship to be dropped at the door so people can work together, because it's about the voters," she said.

The fourth Republican Brunner recently disciplined is Keith Cunningham, Allen County's elections director and a recent member of the state's Board of Voting Machine Examiners, which can decertify voting equipment.

On Feb. 21, Brunner fired Cunningham from the panel because he would not decertify touch-screen voting systems based on results of Brunner's report on Ohio's voting equipment, he said.

Brunner said she didn't want such a narrow view on the board.

Cunningham said he has no evidence Brunner's decision was partisan, but he added, "I think being a Republican made it easier.

"The logic expressed for removing me is so thin, there has to be something more to this."

http://www.cleveland.com/ohio/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/news/120427741377180.xml&coll=2

That's great, thanks. I'll pass it on.
Planned Parenthood is America’s most trusted provider of reproductive health care.

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16143
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: Ohio's new voting system
« Reply #6 on: March 01, 2008, 11:27:34 PM »
Please do. Perhaps you can bundle them with your outrage about US Attorney firings.