Author Topic: The trashing of the Palin family  (Read 744 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
The trashing of the Palin family
« on: September 10, 2008, 02:05:23 AM »
Five days after Alaska Governor Sarah Palin was picked as the Republican vice presidential nominee, NBC's David Gregory falsely disputed the idea that the media had crossed a line by suggesting Palin's family life conflicted with her candidacy. Referring to an earlier interview, Gregory argued on Today: "Rudy Giuliani said questions have been asked about whether she can balance this with her kids. That question has not been brought up by the media.?

Gregory was wrong ? that precise question was posed repeatedly on ABC, CBS and NBC as the networks invaded every nook and cranny of Palin's family life. From August 29 through September 4, the Big Three network morning and evening shows ran a total of 59 stories mentioning Palin's family, or about eight per day. Nearly two-thirds of those (37) brought up the pregnancy of Palin's teenaged daughter; another ten questioned whether she could balance her family obligations with a campaign ? the exact suggestion Gregory claimed was never "brought up by the media."

On Wednesday's Today, NBC's Amy Robach wondered of Palin: "Will she be shortchanging her kids, or will she be shortchanging the country?" During a roundtable discussion on CBS, the Washington Post's Sally Quinn scolded that "a woman with five children, including one with special needs, and a daughter who is a 17-year-old child who is pregnant and about to have a baby, probably has got to rethink her priorities.

"The previous Saturday, ABC weekend Good Morning America co-host Bill Weir referenced the "brutality of a national campaign" as he indignantly challenged a McCain spokesman: "She has an infant with special needs. Will that affect her campaigning?"

There was no holding back when it came to exploiting Palin's 17-year-old pregnant daughter; ABC's Diane Sawyer suggested the pregnancy should cast doubt on Palin's stance favoring "abstinence-only education." But after days of such coverage, journalists such as Time's Joe Klein pompously suggested that complaints from Republicans were nothing but an "insidious" attempt "to bully us into not reporting" unflattering facts about Palin's public life.

That shows an utter blindness to the real problem: a press corps so overtaken by partisanship that they will stoop to using a candidate's young family as ammo against her. Pollster Scott Rasmussen documented the backlash: "Over half of U.S. voters (51%) think reporters are trying to hurt Sarah Palin...and 24% say those stories make them more likely to vote" for the GOP.


Article

"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Michael Tee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12605
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The trashing of the Palin family
« Reply #1 on: September 10, 2008, 02:16:52 AM »
The fact that Republicans are bitching so much about press coverage of legitimate public interest shows that a raw nerve has been hit and the probing should continue.  The polls of who is "more likely" to choose Palin are bullshit.  "More likely" means the issue is not a deciding one and the choice will be made on other issues.  Ot really means 24% don't like the questions being asked.

Life can't be neatly separated from politics.  Obama's spiritual beliefs and the beliefs of his pastor were fair game, Palin's ability to run a family and the demands that a family could be expected to make on her time are also fair game.  What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.  Sarah's appeal is largely personal, and the seamier sides of that persona can and will be mercilessly exposed.  Considering the slanders being perpetrated as we speak against Obama by Republicans, Palin is getting off lightly.

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The trashing of the Palin family
« Reply #2 on: September 10, 2008, 02:19:05 AM »
And all the while, McCain's #'s keep going up, and Obama's keep going down.  Keep playing that nerve, Tee
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Michael Tee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12605
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The trashing of the Palin family
« Reply #3 on: September 10, 2008, 02:25:16 AM »
Funny, I just saw on Larry King the statement that two polls are diametrically opposed.

If the Republicans can manipulate and steal the election itself they can do the same for the polls.  Looks like we gotta pick our polls now just like any other news source.

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The trashing of the Palin family
« Reply #4 on: September 10, 2008, 02:33:23 AM »
That, and the country is full of ignorant racists.  It's the only explaination, of course
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Religious Dick

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1153
  • Drunk, drunk, drunk in the gardens and the graves
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The trashing of the Palin family
« Reply #5 on: September 10, 2008, 02:37:49 AM »
The fact that Republicans are bitching so much about press coverage of legitimate public interest shows that a raw nerve has been hit and the probing should continue. 

No, the bitching shows that the Democrats are handing us plenty of ammunition to fire back at them, and we're making the most of it. I agree - the probing should continue!
I speak of civil, social man under law, and no other.
-Sir Edmund Burke

richpo64

  • Guest
Re: The trashing of the Palin family
« Reply #6 on: September 10, 2008, 12:40:39 PM »
>>And all the while, McCain's #'s keep going up, and Obama's keep going down.  Keep playing that nerve, Tee<<

Can you say, "George Bush 2006"?

Sure you can.