<<Your applied emotional spectrum is so limited . . . >>
I'm not trying to be a smart-ass but I honestly don't know what you mean by that. Specifically why you used "applied" to modify "emotional spectrum."
<< . . . that it's impossible to converse with you. >>
I don't see why it's impossible. If you don't understand anything I said, ask and I'll explain. If you don't agree with anything I said, tell me your reasons for disagreeing and I'll respond. I'm actually a very easy person to communicate with. I ask questions if I don't understand. I give reasons if I don't agree. I admit to a tendency towards impatience and moral indignation, but I am doing my best to rein them in. I understand they can be a pain in the ass.
<<You either chose not to, or are unable, to put into play the human commonalities that make the give and take of a rewarding discourse possible. >>
I'm too rigid in my opinions? In my condemnations? I've often expressly recognized the human commonalities that we share. I'm not clear as to what you mean that I don't "put them into play."
<<I honestly don't know if it's an act, or if it's just you. It's probably both to one degree or another. Too bad.>>
There's some acting involved, I have to admit. There's usually a reason for it. It's mostly didactic, or meant to be. Some of the people I'm encountering here are unlike any I've ever met in my life elsewhere. Sometimes it's just for mischief. And part of it is just me. BFD. We should really converse with one another. You have perspectives that could even be more advanced than my own. But at times I think you've advanced a little too far, in the direction of "beyond good and evil," which is pretty hard for me to accept. I'm still very much into right and wrong.
