Will Washington's Failures Lead To Second American Revolution?

[Christians4LessGvt]

Pennsylvania Democratic Governor Ed Rendell predicted on Tuesday
that if the president escalates America's military involvement in
Afghanistan he could very well face a primary challenger in 2012.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/27/rendell-obama-could-face_n_661172.html

[Kramer]

Pennsylvania Democratic Governor Ed Rendell predicted on Tuesday
that if the president escalates America's military involvement in
Afghanistan he could very well face a primary challenger in 2012.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/27/rendell-obama-could-face_n_661172.html

Afghanistan is Obama's war.

[Christians4LessGvt]

some of my sources are saying Afghanistan is "lost"
Obama is the kind that gives up easy when things get tough
so I expect he will find a way to "cut & run"
pretending there are "nice" Taliban
but history will show that the wussie lost Afghanistan
he will pay dearly for this at election time
unless he attacks Iran

[Kramer]

some of my sources are saying Afghanistan is "lost"
Obama is the kind that gives up easy when things get tough
so I expect he will find a way to "cut & run"
pretending there are "nice" Taliban
but history will show that the wussie lost Afghanistan
he will pay dearly for this at election time
unless he attacks Iran

of course.

Obama has damaged this nation almost beyond repair. Sure he gets credit for it but he's happy to take credit for ruining this nation. Hells bells what better way to send a couple hundred million crackers up shit creek than to ruin the USA. But in the bigger picture, look what will happen to Europe when the US goes down the tubes. His presidency is centered around racial division.

[Christians4LessGvt]

if Obama was to get re-elected and continues down the path of forcing socialism on the American people the nation could indeed disolve into some type of Balkanization civil war.....especially if the calculated non-sense of allowing our country to be over-run by non-english speaking poor uneducated people that do not share our traditional values. i dont predict the war will start that soon but it could.

http://www.floppingaces.net/wp-content/mexprotest2.JPG

[Michael Tee]

<<Obama has damaged this nation almost beyond repair. >>

Bullshit.  He inherited a mess.

<<Sure he gets credit for it but he's happy to take credit for ruining this nation. >>

When did he take credit for ruining the nation?  How'd he ruin it anyway?

<<Hells bells what better way to send a couple hundred million crackers up shit creek than to ruin the USA.>>

Craziest fucking thing you've said in this thread.  There probably aren't even 200 million crackers in the whole fucking country.  And no evidence that Obama wants to send them up shit's creek.  This is nothing but a nutso fantasy in Kramer's mind.

<< But in the bigger picture, look what will happen to Europe when the US goes down the tubes. >>

Nothing will happen to Europe when the US goes down the tubes.  They'll probably all breathe a great sigh of relief that the greatest threat to world peace since Nazi Germany has finally disappeared into a well-deserved obscurity.

<<His presidency is centered around racial division. >>

I'd say that it's the OPPOSITION to his presidency that is centred around racial division.

[sirs]

<<Obama has damaged this nation almost beyond repair. >>

Bullshit.  He inherited a mess.

The proper analogy is he inheritied a laceration, and Obama tried curing it by spreading feces over an open wound.  The resulting systemic infection is all his, and squat to do with inheritence.  Cu4 is right, in that we are nearing the tipping point at which damage control largely becomes implausible

[Xavier_Onassis]

These are silly fantasies, unrelated to any reality deeper than Limbaugh's stupid talkshows.

[Kramer]

These are silly fantasies, unrelated to any reality deeper than Limbaugh's stupid talkshows.

You come off like a 12 year old. Did you know that?

[Plane]

These are silly fantasies, unrelated to any reality deeper than Limbaugh's stupid talkshows.

As deep as that?


Wow

[Kramer]

<<Obama has damaged this nation almost beyond repair. >>

Bullshit.  He inherited a mess.

<<Sure he gets credit for it but he's happy to take credit for ruining this nation. >>

When did he take credit for ruining the nation?  How'd he ruin it anyway?

<<Hells bells what better way to send a couple hundred million crackers up shit creek than to ruin the USA.>>

Craziest fucking thing you've said in this thread.  There probably aren't even 200 million crackers in the whole fucking country.  And no evidence that Obama wants to send them up shit's creek.  This is nothing but a nutso fantasy in Kramer's mind.

<< But in the bigger picture, look what will happen to Europe when the US goes down the tubes. >>

Nothing will happen to Europe when the US goes down the tubes.  They'll probably all breathe a great sigh of relief that the greatest threat to world peace since Nazi Germany has finally disappeared into a well-deserved obscurity.

<<His presidency is centered around racial division. >>

I'd say that it's the OPPOSITION to his presidency that is centred around racial division.

Well Obama let Malik Shabazz off the hook for voter intimidation against white voters so why wouldn't I think Obama doesn't agree with Shabaz based on this hate speech?

http://politisite.com/2010/07/07/video-new-black-panther-party-leader-i-hate-white-people-you-want-freedom-youre-going-to-have-to-kill-some-crackers/

[Michael Tee]

I followed your link but I can't make head or tail of it.  Some fucking lunatic is calling for the killing of cracker babies, some guy (the same lunatic or someone else???) is charged with voter intimidation or maybe two guys are charged.  I couldn't see the connection between the guy calling for the killing of cracker babies with the voter intimidation guys - - was he physically the same person as one of the two guys, and even if he was, it seemed to me that the "kill cracker babies" remark was not made near a polling booth so it's hard to see how this is voter intimidation.  And in any event the second guy was NOT calling for the killing of cracker babies.

Sounds like the usual suspects (right-wing racist nut cases) trying to whip up hysteria through guilt by association in their usual muddled way.  Probably there was no case for voter intimidation or the whole case fell apart and Holder backed off, while all the right-wing fruitcakes are busy trying to link the accused to the "kill cracker babies" guy or link a speech which had no possible connection to voter intimidation to the actual charges.

And then somehow prove that (through the innuendo of the non-existent "links") to prove that Obama was protecting the "kill cracker babies" guy.

[BT]

Either voter intimidation is acceptable or it isn't.

Does it matter who does the intimidating and who is intimidated for it to be prosecutable under the voter's rights act?

[sirs]

These are silly fantasies, unrelated to any reality deeper than Limbaugh's stupid talkshows.

And that has what to do with anything??

[Plane]

I followed your link but I can't make head or tail of it.  Some fucking lunatic is calling for the killing of cracker babies, some guy (the same lunatic or someone else???) is charged with voter intimidation or maybe two guys are charged.  I couldn't see the connection between the guy calling for the killing of cracker babies with the voter intimidation guys - - was he physically the same person as one of the two guys, and even if he was, it seemed to me that the "kill cracker babies" remark was not made near a polling booth so it's hard to see how this is voter intimidation.  And in any event the second guy was NOT calling for the killing of cracker babies.

Sounds like the usual suspects (right-wing racist nut cases) trying to whip up hysteria through guilt by association in their usual muddled way.  Probably there was no case for voter intimidation or the whole case fell apart and Holder backed off, while all the right-wing fruitcakes are busy trying to link the accused to the "kill cracker babies" guy or link a speech which had no possible connection to voter intimidation to the actual charges.

And then somehow prove that (through the innuendo of the non-existent "links") to prove that Obama was protecting the "kill cracker babies" guy.

Yes that is the same guy who was waving a club at voters.