Well, first of all, I never actually said that would be my favored course of action. That was sort of an add-on after you tried to goad it out of me that I would callously cut off funds to the war (interpreted by partisans as "screwing the troops") and I answered with complete honesty and told you I didn't know if that would inadvertently place the troops in danger so I wouldn't be the one pressing for that. If it was demonstrated to me that de-funding would NOT put the troops in harm's way, then I would be for that, but it wouldn't be my favored course.
The maneuvering would be a political move and it could be easily misrepresented by partisans and it really serves no purpose. It's not like that money can't be re-appropriated. It's like putting quarters in a dryer and taking the clothes out when they're dry and you can't get the remaining time back in quarters. They won't have to go on fighting till the money runs out. So, repealing the authority is the real action.
So, I won't feel any real impulse to go activist to make them de-fund the war if they will just go ahead and repeal the authority, take control of the situation and start the drawdown.
My tepid attitude is only directed at "de-funding the war". If that insinuates that I'm partisan, I can't help that. I can only tell you what I'd do or what I hope that congress does.