<<Where's the evidence that Saddam killed a single one of his victims?
<<Didn't Saddam have a biography and a biographical movie?
<<I think he is confessed to being an assassin in his earlyer career , before he studyed law.>>
I'm not sure that he "confessed" to successfully assassinating anyone, and even if he did, it could have been empty bragging, not under oath and never tested in court. He wasn't charged with it and he wasn't convicted of it. In BT's theory, this would mean he didn't do it - - no smoking gun.
<<Wouldn't his approval of this biographical information be construed as confession?>>
No. See above.
<<And of course we have him on film personally purgeing his party .>>
What you have on film is his public accusation of treason and their arrests. Period. No killing, not even a slap in the face. Again, no smoking gun. And again, he wasn't charged or convicted of their deaths either.
But of course, I'm just having a little fun with the BT smoking gun theory of guilt - - we all know that it applies only to AMERICANS like your "President" who have obviously committed atrocities or had command responsibility for them. It was never intended to exonerate Arabs or anyone else. Certainly not to Saddam Hussein. He's an ARAB, for chrissake.