Author Topic: So Gerald Ford wasn't such a great guy afterall..  (Read 8683 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Jwmcc

  • Guest
So Gerald Ford wasn't such a great guy afterall..
« on: January 02, 2007, 10:16:52 PM »
So says Christopher Hitchens:

Our Short National Nightmare
How President Ford managed to go soft on Iraqi Baathists, Indonesian fascists, Soviet Communists, and the shah … in just two years.
By Christopher Hitchens
Posted Friday, Dec. 29, 2006, at 2:08 PM ET



One expects a certain amount of piety and hypocrisy when retired statesmen give up the ghost, but this doesn't excuse the astonishing number of omissions and misstatements that have characterized the sickly national farewell to Gerald Ford. One could graze for hours on the great slopes of the massive obituaries and never guess that during his mercifully brief occupation of the White House, this president had:

Disgraced the United States in Iraq and inaugurated a long period of calamitous misjudgment of that country.
Colluded with the Indonesian dictatorship in a gross violation of international law that led to a near-genocide in East Timor.
Delivered a resounding snub to Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn at the time when the Soviet dissident movement was in the greatest need of solidarity.
Instead, there was endless talk about "healing," and of the "courage" that it had taken for Ford to excuse his former boss from the consequences of his law-breaking. You may choose, if you wish, to parrot the line that Watergate was a "long national nightmare," but some of us found it rather exhilarating to see a criminal president successfully investigated and exposed and discredited. And we do not think it in the least bit nightmarish that the Constitution says that such a man is not above the law. Ford's ignominious pardon of this felonious thug meant, first, that only the lesser fry had to go to jail. It meant, second, that we still do not even know why the burglars were originally sent into the offices of the Democratic National Committee. In this respect, the famous pardon is not unlike the Warren Commission: another establishment exercise in damage control and pseudo-reassurance (of which Ford was also a member) that actually raised more questions than it answered. The fact is that serious trials and fearless investigations often are the cause of great division, and rightly so. But by the standards of "healing" celebrated this week, one could argue that O.J. Simpson should have been spared indictment lest the vexing questions of race be unleashed to trouble us again, or that the Tower Commission did us all a favor by trying to bury the implications of the Iran-Contra scandal. Fine, if you don't mind living in a banana republic.

To enlarge on the points that I touched upon above: Bob Woodward has gone into print this week with the news that Ford opposed the Bush administration's intervention in Iraq. But Ford's own interference in the life of that country has gone unmentioned. During his tenure, and while Henry Kissinger was secretary of state, the United States secretly armed and financed a Kurdish rebellion against Saddam Hussein. This was done in collusion with the Shah of Iran, who was then considered in Washington a man who could do no wrong. So that when the shah signed a separate peace with Saddam in 1975, and abandoned his opportunist support for the Kurds, the United States shamefacedly followed his lead and knifed the Kurds in the back. The congressional inquiry led by Rep. Otis Pike was later to describe this betrayal as one of the most cynical acts of statecraft on record.

In December 1975, Ford was actually in the same room as Gen. Suharto of Indonesia when the latter asked for American permission to impose Indonesian military occupation on East Timor. Despite many denials and evasions, we now possess the conclusive evidence that Ford (and his deputy Kissinger) did more than simply nod assent to this outrageous proposition. They also undertook to defend it from criticism in the United States Congress and elsewhere. From that time forward, the Indonesian dictatorship knew that it would not lack for armaments or excuses, both of these lavishly supplied from Washington. The figures for civilian deaths in this shameful business have never been properly calculated, but may well amount to several hundred thousand and thus more than a quarter of East Timor's population.

Ford's refusal to meet with Solzhenitsyn, when the great dissident historian came to America, was consistent with his general style of making excuses for power. As Timothy Noah has suggested lately, there seems to have been a confusion in Ford's mind as to whether the Helsinki Treaty was intended to stabilize, recognize, or challenge the Soviet domination of Eastern Europe. However that may be, the great moral component of the Helsinki agreement—that it placed the United States on the side of the repressed populations—was ridiculed by Ford's repudiation of Solzhenitsyn, as well as by his later fatuities on the nature of Soviet domination. To have been soft on Republican crime, soft on Baathism, soft on the shah, soft on Indonesian fascism, and soft on Communism, all in one brief and transient presidency, argues for the sort of sportsmanlike Midwestern geniality that we do not ever need to see again.

Finally to the Mayaguez. Ford did not dispatch forces to "rescue" the vessel, as so many of his obituarists have claimed. He ordered an attack on the Cambodian island of Koh Tang, several hours after the crew of the ship had actually been released. A subsequent congressional inquiry discovered that he, and Henry Kissinger, could have discovered as much by monitoring Cambodian radio and contacting foreign diplomats. Eighteen Marines and 23 USAF men were killed in this pointless exercise in bravado, as were many Cambodians. The American names appear on the Vietnam memorial in Washington, even though their lives were lost long after the undeclared war was officially "over." The Ford epoch did not banish a nightmare. It ended a dream—the ideal of equal justice under the law that would extend to a crooked and venal president. And in Iraq and Indonesia and Indochina, it either protracted existing nightmares or gave birth to new ones.

Christopher Hitchens is a columnist for Vanity Fair. His most recent book is Thomas Jefferson: Author of America.

Article URL: http://www.slate.com/id/2156400/

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: So Gerald Ford wasn't such a great guy afterall..
« Reply #1 on: January 02, 2007, 11:33:42 PM »
Well , he was no Reagan , but he was ,thank Goodness, no Carter either.

Brassmask

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2600
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: So Gerald Ford wasn't such a great guy afterall..
« Reply #2 on: January 03, 2007, 12:25:11 AM »
I still have yet to see one article or story since his passing that mentions his being on the Warren Commission (and/or being one of the co-conspirators in the murder of one John F Kennedy, a sitting president).

Amianthus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7574
  • Bring on the flames...
    • View Profile
    • Mario's Home Page
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: So Gerald Ford wasn't such a great guy afterall..
« Reply #3 on: January 03, 2007, 01:03:44 AM »
I still have yet to see one article or story since his passing that mentions his being on the Warren Commission (and/or being one of the co-conspirators in the murder of one John F Kennedy, a sitting president).

Well, they wouldn't mention the latter, because it's not true.

For the former, however:

From George HW Bush's eulogy:
Quote
After a deluded gunman assassinated President Kennedy, our nation turned to Gerald Ford and a select handful of others to make sense of that madness. And the conspiracy theorists can say what they will, but the Warren Commission report will always have the final definitive say on this tragic matter. Why? Because Jerry Ford put his name on it and Jerry Ford’s word was always good.

From Bloomberg:
Quote
In 1963, President Lyndon B. Johnson appointed Ford to the Warren Commission to investigate the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. Two years later, Ford co-wrote a book, "Portrait of the Assassin," on the commission's conclusion that Kennedy was killed in Dallas by a single gunman, Lee Harvey Oswald.

From Fox News:
Quote
In 1963 President Johnson appointed Ford to the Warren Commission investigating the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. Ford never wavered in his belief that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. In 1965 Ford co-authored, with John R. Stiles, a book about the findings of the commission, "Portrait of the Assassin."

There are many more. Those were just among the top ten on a Google news search.
Do not anticipate trouble, or worry about what may never happen. Keep in the sunlight. (Benjamin Franklin)

yellow_crane

  • Guest
Re: So Gerald Ford wasn't such a great guy afterall..
« Reply #4 on: January 03, 2007, 01:42:56 AM »
I tuned into a lot of the running commentaries about Ford, hoping to see some mention of the fact that, because Nixon was pardoned, the successful unseating of an obsessive abuser of presidential power was rendered moot, and America would well see furthur abuses of presidential power as a result of the pardon.

But, strangely, all the circuits were full of policians who all suffered a miraculous metanoia.  Almost with the rythym of talkings points' finger snapping, all had previously thought Ford's absolute pardon of Nixon was "reprehensable," and Washington was a "powderkeg of resentment."  To qualify the assumption, a consensus theory prevails among them that it cost Ford the election.

But all of a sudden, everybody's got religion, and to a one all declared, sometimes laboriously, that now they thought Ford had "done the right thing" in granting Nixon an absolute pardon.

Everybody, suddenly, is on the same page about the pardon.

Nary a single one of them held that when Ford pardoned Nixon, Justice to the American people was rudely denied by absolute imperium.   Even Jung would agree that the collective psyche of America was betrayed in that single act, or what is Justice for?

Americans wanted not only just punishment for the offender, but precedent that they should be safe from its slithering offspring.


Forgive them not, O Justice, for they know what they do.


Brassmask

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2600
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: So Gerald Ford wasn't such a great guy afterall..
« Reply #5 on: January 03, 2007, 02:02:19 AM »
Quote
After a deluded gunman assassinated President Kennedy, our nation turned to Gerald Ford and a select handful of others to make sense of that madness. And the conspiracy theorists can say what they will, but the Warren Commission report will always have the final definitive say on this tragic matter. Why? Because Jerry Ford put his name on it and Jerry Ford’s word was always good.



Good grief, he's actually telling everyone they got sacred cows to rubber stamp the lie.

Lanya

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3300
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: So Gerald Ford wasn't such a great guy afterall..
« Reply #6 on: January 03, 2007, 02:21:08 AM »
I never understood his pardon.  I thought the country needed the impeachment and trial very, very much.  Why does a country need the "healing power" of a pardon? A trial  is justice on display.  That's America.
Now, of course they're all for pardons.  If you worked in the Bush administration wouldn't you be all for pardons?

As a man, I sort of grew to like him. A good husband, very supportive of Betty, who I admired for her struggles and conquering adversity. And her pro-choice stance, loud and proud. 

I remember his continual problem with pronouncing the word "Guarantee."   Gahr n tee.  His speechwriters would work with him, I read, but he couldn't help it.  My father-in-law said it exactly the same way. 
Planned Parenthood is America’s most trusted provider of reproductive health care.

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: So Gerald Ford wasn't such a great guy afterall..
« Reply #7 on: January 03, 2007, 02:39:23 AM »
I never understood his pardon.  I thought the country needed the impeachment and trial very, very much.  Why does a country need the "healing power" of a pardon? A trial  is justice on display.  That's America.
Now, of course they're all for pardons.  If you worked in the Bush administration wouldn't you be all for pardons?

As a man, I sort of grew to like him. A good husband, very supportive of Betty, who I admired for her struggles and conquering adversity. And her pro-choice stance, loud and proud. 

I remember his continual problem with pronouncing the word "Guarantee."   Gahr n tee.  His speechwriters would work with him, I read, but he couldn't help it.  My father-in-law said it exactly the same way. 

Do you really feel like that ?

It is not too late to try Clinton .

Amianthus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7574
  • Bring on the flames...
    • View Profile
    • Mario's Home Page
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: So Gerald Ford wasn't such a great guy afterall..
« Reply #8 on: January 03, 2007, 07:09:34 AM »
Now, of course they're all for pardons.  If you worked in the Bush administration wouldn't you be all for pardons?

Of course, you're totally ignoring the fact that the Bushs (either of 'em) have given less pardons than any other president. Clinton was nearly the king of pardons, giving out more than most other presidents.
Do not anticipate trouble, or worry about what may never happen. Keep in the sunlight. (Benjamin Franklin)

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: So Gerald Ford wasn't such a great guy afterall..
« Reply #9 on: January 03, 2007, 09:49:24 AM »
A pardon to some minor characters is hardly the same as a pardon to a president, particularly one who promised a 'secret plan' to end the Vietnam War, and then dragged the ghastly thing on through thousands of useless casualties. There was no such plan, and whatever the hell he meant by it has never been reported.

Nixon was hugely more guilty of infractions against democracy than Clinton. A tasteless, but totally legal blowjob does nothing to harm the democratic process.

The 'long nightmare' of Watergate would have been laid to rest better with a conviction and a sentence for Nixon.

As Kurt Vonnegut said: "The Founding Fathers never anticipated that the people would elect a man who so thoroughly despised them'.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Brassmask

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2600
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: So Gerald Ford wasn't such a great guy afterall..
« Reply #10 on: January 03, 2007, 01:57:40 PM »
Now, of course they're all for pardons.  If you worked in the Bush administration wouldn't you be all for pardons?

Of course, you're totally ignoring the fact that the Bushs (either of 'em) have given less pardons than any other president. Clinton was nearly the king of pardons, giving out more than most other presidents.

You need a parrot or perhaps some kind of symbol for your stock "Clinton did it!" posts.  You might have to qualify it sometimes with a "...more!" or "...worse!".

Amianthus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7574
  • Bring on the flames...
    • View Profile
    • Mario's Home Page
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: So Gerald Ford wasn't such a great guy afterall..
« Reply #11 on: January 03, 2007, 02:03:26 PM »
You need a parrot or perhaps some kind of symbol for your stock "Clinton did it!" posts.  You might have to qualify it sometimes with a "...more!" or "...worse!".

Shall we get one for the plethora of "Bush did it" or alternately "(Reagan|Bush 1|Ford|Nixon) did it" as well?

Sorry if you don't like the facts, but thems the facts... Democrat presidents have always tended to use presidential pardons much more heavily than Republicans.
Do not anticipate trouble, or worry about what may never happen. Keep in the sunlight. (Benjamin Franklin)

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: So Gerald Ford wasn't such a great guy afterall..
« Reply #12 on: January 03, 2007, 02:23:46 PM »
Shall we get one for the plethora of "Bush did it" or alternately "(Reagan|Bush 1|Ford|Nixon) did it" as well?  Sorry if you don't like the facts, but thems the facts... Democrat presidents have always tended to use presidential pardons much more heavily than Republicans.

It is fascinating (& entertaining) to watch that whenever you see the knee jerk responses along the lines of "You need a parrot or perhaps some kind of symbol for your stock "Clinton did it!" posts", you'll note it never is refuting the fact, simply trying to diminish it, if not misdirect the bystanding reader to disregard the fact being presented.  Most of our readers, I'm confident, are too sharp for that ploy, which brings us back to it's entertainment value    ;D
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Brassmask

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2600
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: So Gerald Ford wasn't such a great guy afterall..
« Reply #13 on: January 03, 2007, 02:45:10 PM »
It is fascinating (& entertaining) to watch that whenever you see the knee jerk responses along the lines of "You need a parrot or perhaps some kind of symbol for your stock "Clinton did it!" posts", you'll note it never is refuting the fact, simply trying to diminish it, if not misdirect the bystanding reader to disregard the fact being presented.  Most of our readers, I'm confident, are too sharp for that ploy, which brings us back to it's entertainment value    ;D

The insinuation is insulting that since Clinton did something that someone is complaining about that Bush did, that somehow it invalidates the complaint.  It doesn't.  Clinton is gone.  Bush is here.

If I had known all of you when Clinton was in office, I'm sure I would have eventually moved in my thinking the way I have over the now nearly 5 years of this forum.  If Clinton had done something like started a war to steal oil and gotten 3000 troops killed and still thought that getting more killed would fix those who have died already, then I'd hated his fucking guts too but still retained my principles as a liberal.

This kneejerk "Clinton did it" crap is simply YOU GUYS' way of not addressing the facts of Bush's "administration".  It's a red herring and its bullshit tactics/strategy crap that I abhor.

Amianthus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7574
  • Bring on the flames...
    • View Profile
    • Mario's Home Page
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: So Gerald Ford wasn't such a great guy afterall..
« Reply #14 on: January 03, 2007, 02:56:27 PM »
It's a red herring and its bullshit tactics/strategy crap that I abhor.

It might be a red herring if the comment I was responding to hadn't included the "of course, now they're all for pardons" quip - as if pardons were an uncommon thing before this administration.

It remains a fact that fewer presidential pardons have occured under this president than the prior president.
Do not anticipate trouble, or worry about what may never happen. Keep in the sunlight. (Benjamin Franklin)