Author Topic: Glenn Beck you're late!  (Read 3043 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16143
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: Glenn Beck you're late!
« Reply #15 on: April 05, 2011, 10:23:36 PM »
Taxpayer Alert: The Coming Postal Service Bailout
By LOUIS PECK, The Fiscal Times April 5, 2011

The federal government isn?t the only entity in Washington about to hit the debt ceiling: So is the U.S. Postal Service, the independent agency created four decades ago to take over and streamline the task of mail delivery.

Facing a projected $6.4 billion loss this year, on top of a record shortfall in fiscal 2010, the Postal Service is expected to slam into the $15 billion statutory debt limit established by Congress by the end of the current fiscal year on Sept. 30. At that point, it could be faced with the choice of running out of cash or defaulting on its sizable pension obligations, including a required $5.5 billion annual payment to fund future retiree health costs. This has intensified efforts on Capitol Hill to scrutinize Postal Service management practices, as well as to find ways to provide potential short- and long-term relief to the beleaguered agency.

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa, R-CA, convened a hearing today to take aim at the Postal Service?s recent deal with the American Postal Workers Union, representing more than one-third of the agency?s 572,000 person work force. The deal, which still requires ratification by the union?s membership, calls for a two-year pay freeze followed by a 3.5 percent wage increase over three years. "Eighty percent of the Postal Service's operating expenses are workforce-related. Costs must be reduced to align them with falling mail volume and declining revenue projections,? Issa declared.

But others suggest the major culprit is not current Postal Service management ? which has reduced the size of the agency by 100,000 employees in the past two years ? but rather Congress itself. While demanding that the Postal Service find ways to achieve economic self-sufficiency, members of Congress often have hamstrung the Postal Service with a series of restrictions aimed at averting blowback from their political constituencies.

As the Postal Service adjusts to email, electronic bill paying and faxes replacing so-called snail mail, ?it would be irresponsible for Congress, as it does now, to stand in the way and act like a 535-member board of directors,? Sen. Thomas Carper, D-Del., said recently. ?No real business could ever function under that type of governance and it's unrealistic to think that the Postal Service would be well served by that type of micromanagement.?

Carper chairs the Senate subcommittee with jurisdiction over the Postal Service, and plans soon to reintroduce legislation to give the Postal Service management greater flexibility on issues ranging from closure of local post offices to the frequency of delivery to expanded offerings of products and services. Specifically:

    Carper?s legislation would remove a deficit test for closing post offices. The 1970 law creating the Postal Service dictates: ?No small post office shall be closed solely for operating at a deficit, it being the specific intent of the Congress that effective postal services be insured to residents of both urban and rural communities.? While the Postal Service last week announced a streamlined process for post office closing, along with plans to review the viability of as many as 3,000 of the current 32,000 post offices in operation nationwide, advocates of Carper?s proposal say it remains difficult to shut down underutilized facilities ? save for cases such as the retirement of a local postmaster or the expiration of a building lease. Carper?s goal is to enable many small post offices to relocate to less costly locations, such as available space in retail outlets.
    The legislation would clarify the Postal Service?s authority to eliminate Saturday delivery if it determines such a step is necessary. The Postal Service wants to do away with Saturday delivery, a move it contends would save more than $3 billion annually. But a 1983 rider attached to a congressional appropriations bill has been cited by opponents as barring changes to the current six-day delivery schedule ? despite a provision in a 2006 Postal Service reform statute  intended to allow the Postal Service to alter delivery frequency through the federal regulatory process.
    Carper?s proposal seeks to clear the way for the Postal Service to offer services in areas related to its core mission ? such as increased electronic mail options for businesses. Also contemplated are arrangements in which the Postal Service could contract with other governmental entities to offer services such as issuance of drivers and hunting licenses ? yielding revenue for the Postal Service and potential cost savings for cash-strapped state and local governments. Past efforts by the Postal Service to add revenue by branching out into other services have run into congressional opposition.

At the hearing, Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe called the agreement with the postal workers union ?the best deal we could have struck under current law? and said it would save a ?minimum? of $3.8 billion over the life of the contract.

Rep. Dennis Ross, R-Fla, who chairs the House subcommittee with jurisdiction over the Postal Service, agreed that legislative changes are needed to enable the agency to restructure itself, although he said he was ?skeptical? of Donahoe?s savings estimate. ?The bigger issue is really the longer-term changes we need to make to the Postal Service in terms of its viability,? Ross said. ?I hope we can empower you to do more.? But Issa, who has blasted one major provision of Carper?s legislation as a ?bailout? of the Postal Service, could be a stumbling block to any accord.

That provision would free up about $50 billion in past retiree pension payments for future use by the Postal Service. This stems from a long-running dispute, in which the Postal Service has argued that formulas devised by the federal Office of Personnel Management have resulted in the agency being overcharged anywhere from $55 billion to $75 billion in payments to federal pension funds. Emily Spain, a spokeswoman for Sen. Carper, noted that two outside accounting firms ? Hay Group and Segal Group ? as well as the Postal Service?s Inspector General and the Postal Regulatory Commission ? ?identified the pension obligations given to the Postal Service in 1970 as a mistake that is hamstringing the Postal Service financially today.?   

But the Congressional Budget Office has raised questions about whether freeing up that money could give the Postal Service less incentive to cut costs.

The only Congressional funding for the Postal Service is about $29 million, technically reimbursement for free mail services for the blind and overseas voters. That?s a small portion of the agency?s $67 billion annual revenue, most of it from postage fees. A rate increase scheduled for later this month, the sixth since 2002, keeps the basic first-class stamp at 44 cents but increases other rates.

First-class mail was projected to decline about 6 percent in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared with a year earlier, according to figures the Postal Service provided to the General Accounting Office. While the volume of less profitable standard mail is still growing, the Postal Service estimates that by 2020 the total volume of first-class and standard mail will have declined to where it was in 1986, nearly 35 years earlier.

Absent some type of long-term financial relief, or about $4.5 billion in shorter-term concessions in President Obama?s proposed fiscal 2012 budget, Postal Service officials warn they may have no choice but to default on some pension-related obligations in the coming months.

?The postmaster general has been very clear on this. He has said that we are going to pay salaries, we are going to pay our vendors ? we?re simply not going to pay the retiree health benefit prepayment,? said Postal Service spokesman Gerald McKiernan, referring to the $5.5 billion annual requirement imposed by Congress four years ago. ?What happens [then]? I don?t know. This is all unknown territory,? he added.

http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/2011/04/05/Taxpayer-Alert-The-Coming-Postal-Service-Bailout.aspx?p=1

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Glenn Beck you're late!
« Reply #16 on: April 05, 2011, 11:33:13 PM »
It would be exceedingly stupid for the government to shut down, and the Republicans will get blamed for it.

It is not any sort of advantage for the Republicans not to have anyone that looks like a leader.

As you shall shortly see.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Kramer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5762
  • Repeal ObamaCare
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Glenn Beck you're late!
« Reply #17 on: April 05, 2011, 11:49:54 PM »
It would be exceedingly stupid for the government to shut down, and the Republicans will get blamed for it.

It is not any sort of advantage for the Republicans not to have anyone that looks like a leader.

As you shall shortly see.

you are out of touch, same as your president and Pelosi, we want it shut down! We are sick & tired of the crazy spending, taxation, waste and fraud. We want it shut down bigtime and the Repubs will be rewarded handsomely for doing it!

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Glenn Beck you're late!
« Reply #18 on: April 06, 2011, 12:59:27 AM »
You are beyond stupid.

No one voted for anyone to shut the government down.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Glenn Beck you're late!
« Reply #19 on: April 06, 2011, 01:41:42 AM »
It would be exceedingly stupid for the government to shut down, and the Republicans will get blamed for it.

Despite the fact it would be both of their's fault, Dems > Repubs


It is not any sort of advantage for the Republicans not to have anyone that looks like a leader.

Ryan's sure stepping up

"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16143
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: Glenn Beck you're late!
« Reply #20 on: April 06, 2011, 01:52:38 AM »
Ryan looks like the teacher in glee

Paul Ryan


Matthew Morrison



Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Glenn Beck you're late!
« Reply #21 on: April 06, 2011, 11:51:04 AM »
He is more dangerous than a teacher in Glee.

It makes little sense to argue that we should ignore vast amounts of waste in the military and abolish NPR.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Glenn Beck you're late!
« Reply #22 on: April 06, 2011, 01:04:59 PM »
There's nothing in the constitution that mandates Government to be using tax dollars to maintain a radio station.  Talk about nonsensical
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Glenn Beck you're late!
« Reply #23 on: April 06, 2011, 04:06:26 PM »
NPR serves a very useful purpose. No one else has even minimal news coverage on the radio. The cost of NPR is minimal.

"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16143
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: Glenn Beck you're late!
« Reply #24 on: April 06, 2011, 04:20:14 PM »
NPR serves a very useful purpose. No one else has even minimal news coverage on the radio. The cost of NPR is minimal.

Would you rather an NPR subsidy or  funding for the school lunch programs? If forced to choose.

Kramer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5762
  • Repeal ObamaCare
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Glenn Beck you're late!
« Reply #25 on: April 06, 2011, 05:01:35 PM »
You are beyond stupid.

No one voted for anyone to shut the government down.

why is it the 2010 Congress, controlled by Democraps, did not pass a budget? It is required by the Constitution to pass a budget every year. Why did they not do it? and if the gov shuts down it will be 100% the fault of the Democrap Party, not Republicans.

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Glenn Beck you're late!
« Reply #26 on: April 06, 2011, 08:44:53 PM »
NPR serves a very useful purpose.

Doesn't matter.  It's not in the Constitution.  Good intentions or "useful purpose" (as defined by.....) does not a mandate of tax dollars make


No one else has even minimal news coverage on the radio.

Again, irrelevant since there are many stations devoted to news and talk


The cost of NPR is minimal.

And when a Government is running deficit, you stop spending tax dollars on things that are both "minimal" and not constitutionally or legally mandated
« Last Edit: April 07, 2011, 12:02:19 AM by sirs »
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Christians4LessGvt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11149
    • View Profile
    • "The Religion Of Peace"
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Glenn Beck you're late!
« Reply #27 on: April 06, 2011, 09:12:06 PM »
NPR, PBS, AMTRACK, Dept of Education, Dept of Energy, ObamaCare
should be the starting point of cutting entire programs......
"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" - Ronald Reagan - June 12, 1987

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Glenn Beck you're late!
« Reply #28 on: April 06, 2011, 11:26:38 PM »
NOT gonna happen.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Glenn Beck you're late!
« Reply #29 on: April 07, 2011, 12:11:47 AM »
NOT gonna happen.

Congress on Tuesday revoked the first significant parts of President Obama?s health care initiative when the Senate voted overwhelmingly to eliminate a burdensome tax paperwork requirement the law imposes on businesses.

Republicans called the bill ?a down payment on total repeal? while most Democrats said it marked an improvement in last year?s law. The bill had previously cleared the House and now goes directly to Mr. Obama.

But it marked a rare flash of bipartisanship on a day when Democrats and Republicans otherwise clashed over short-term and long-term spending as they girded for a government shutdown by week?s end.

?Just as the executive branch is doing, we?re also preparing for the possibility of a shutdown,? House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, Virginia Republican, told reporters after a morning meeting at the White House between top Republicans and Democrats failed to produce a breakthrough.

Even with that battle unresolved, House Republicans opened a new front in the spending wars when Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan unveiled his 2012 spending blueprint, calling for major changes to both Medicare and Medicaid, the big health care programs that are projected to drive up federal deficits in coming years.

The government?s staggering debt and annual trillion-dollar deficits have dominated the discussion in Washington since the beginning of the year, but have come to a head as Congress races to beat an April 8 deadline, when stopgap funding expires.

Republicans are demanding deep cuts in spending and Democrats have slowly been moving in their direction, though they argue the GOP is pushing too far.

Mr. Obama himself got involved in the negotiations Tuesday, hosting the White House meeting, but he said he shouldn?t have to be the referee for the two parties.

?I shouldn?t have to oversee a process in which Congress deals with last year?s budget where we only have six months left ? especially when both parties have agreed that we need to make substantial cuts and we?re more or less at the same number,? a visibly frustrated president told reporters when he made a surprise visit to the White House briefing room.

Congress is racing against a shutdown deadline because lawmakers failed to pass a budget or any of the dozen annual spending bills before the Oct. 1 start of fiscal 2011.

Democrats, who controlled both the House and Senate last year, shut down Congress in the run-up to the elections and used the postelection lame-duck session to extend tax breaks and unemployment benefits and end the ban on acknowledged gays serving in the military.

Republicans and Democrats have traded proposed cuts this year, but only the House has passed a yearlong funding bill, which includes $61 billion in cuts from 2010 levels.

Democrats, who still control the Senate, have signaled their desire to negotiate a final deal behind closed doors.

They said they thought a compromise had been reached with House Speaker John A. Boehner, Ohio Republican, to cut $33 billion. But Mr. Boehner said no deal was finalized because they couldn?t agree on the exact makeup of those cuts or on what legislative add-ons, known as policy riders, to include.

Among those riders are provisions to restrict federal funding for Planned Parenthood and to curb Mr. Obama?s authority to implement the health care law.

Stymied in those broader attacks on health care, Republicans managed Tuesday to include a provision to undo the law?s tax paperwork requirement.

Sen. Orrin G. Hatch, Utah Republican, said it is ?a down payment on total repeal of the onerous health care law.?

The measure passed the Senate by a 87-12 vote and was sent to Mr. Obama, whose administration had opposed the bill?s changes to the way subsides in the exchange are funded. Democrats said the changes could make people less eager to take part in the exchanges.

After the bill passed, White House press secretary Jay Carney said Mr. Obama is ?open? to changing the law.

?We are pleased Congress has acted to correct a flaw that placed an unnecessary bookkeeping burden on small businesses,? he said.

The measure has become known as the ?1099 repeal? because it would relieve businesses of having to file 1099 tax forms for any person or company they pay at least $600 in a year. It was designed to stop tax cheats, and was projected to raise billions of dollars, which were to be used to fund new health care benefits.

In order to make up for that money in their repeal, House Republicans rewrote the way the government would pay for subsidies under the new health exchanges in the law.

Under current law, consumers are allowed to keep much of the money when the government overpays them, but the new bill would claw back most of that money from taxpayers.

Mr. Ryan?s budget blueprint, meanwhile, opens yet another front in the GOP?s battle against Mr. Obama?s health care law.

The budget calls for repealing the law and making fundamental changes in existing health care programs such as Medicare and Medicaid.

Mr. Ryan would convert Medicaid, the state-federal low-income health program, into block grants to states, and would restructure Medicare, the federal health program for seniors, so that retirees would choose from among a series of private plans and have costs be covered by the government.

Democrats said those plans would hurt the poor and elderly who rely on them.

?It is not courageous to protect tax breaks for millionaires, oil companies, and other big money special interests while slashing our investments in education, ending the current health care guarantees for seniors on Medicare, and denying health care coverage to tens of millions of Americans,? said Rep. Chris Van Hollen, the ranking Democrat on the Budget Committee.

Mr. Ryan acknowledged he may be ?giving our political adversaries a weapon to use against us,? but said the payoff of having the debate will be worth it.

?This is not a budget ? this is a cause,? he said.

Way to "not" start
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle