Author Topic: Former Reaganite: Bush is like Hitler  (Read 1152 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Brassmask

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2600
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Former Reaganite: Bush is like Hitler
« on: January 09, 2007, 11:52:09 AM »
I'm not familiar with him offhand but I'm assuming that Paul Craig Roberts must have "gone off the reservation years ago" or he might have not been a "real Republican" or was one of "Reagan's least favorite people" or some other detriment that makes his opinion "less than".


http://www.antiwar.com/roberts/?articleid=10284

Bush is like Hitler. He blames defeats on his military commanders, not on his own insane policy. Like Hitler, he protects himself from reality with delusion. In his last hours, Hitler was ordering non-existent German armies to drive the Russians from Berlin.

By manipulating Bush and provoking a military crisis in which the US stands to lose its army in Iraq, the neoconservatives hope to revive the implementation of their plan for US conquest of the Middle East. They believe they can use fear, "honor," and the aversion of macho Americans to ignoble defeat to expand the conflict in response to military disaster. The neocons believe that the loss of an American army would be met with the electorate’s demand for revenge. The barriers to the draft would fall, as would the barriers to the use of nuclear weapons.

Neocon godfather Norman Podhoretz set out the plan for Middle East conquest several years ago in Commentary magazine. It is a plan for Muslim genocide. In place of physical extermination of Muslims, Podhoretz advocates their cultural destruction by deracination. Islam is to be torn out by the roots and reduced to a purely formal shell devoid of any real beliefs.


Michael Tee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12605
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Former Reaganite: Bush is like Hitler
« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2007, 04:19:08 PM »
Paul Craig Roberts appears from time to time in CounterPunch (www.counterpunch.com) and probably elsewhere.  His articles are almost invariably concise, well-thought-out, straight to the point and make a hell of a lot of sense.  His credentials are impeccable, even to (or especially to) the right-wing nutjobs who are prone to "shoot the messenger."  I've posted a few of his articles here in this group, usually to minimum adverse comment (since even the nuthatches probably can find nothing to rebut him with.)

I've said in the past that comparisons of Bush to Hitler are far wide of the mark and way too flattering to Bush, who isn't half the man Hitler was even in his stature as an evil-doer and mass murderer, let alone as a warrior, thinker, writer and orator.  Somewhere back in the mists of prehistory there must have been primitive cave-dwelling leaders, battle-shy but able to convince others younger and more courageous than they to go forth from the cave to rape, torture, kill and eat the weaker and less numerous inhabitants of some distant cave too far away to be able to inflict any payback carnage of their own.  THAT'S the kind of nameless leader that Bush most closely resembles.  Enough of this Hitler crap.