Neo-Cons Duking It Out With Classical Imperialists - An AIPAC Nightmare

[sirs]

The article was crammed with facts. ... Opinion admittedly

Opinions are not facts.

Unless it's coming from Tee or any op-ed he supports, of course     

[Michael Tee]

<<Even some of the names are wrong. >>

"Wrong" as in misspelled, or wrong as in the wrong person was named as holder of a particular office or what?

Methinks if there were substance to the nitpicking, full details would be freely dispensed; your reticence leads me to believe that the "errors" if they exist at all are truly insignificant.
 

[Michael Tee]

<<Opinions are not facts.>>

Of course not.  But the combination of the opinion with the name of the person holding it is very definitely a fact;  if that person previously held the opposite opinion, that is a newsworthy fact; and, of course, it's a fact that certain influential opinion-makers are swinging around to a different view of things.  That's news.   If you can't understand WHY that's news, or why that's fact, we had best agree to disagree and move on to something else.

[BT]

Methinks if there were substance to the nitpicking, full details would be freely dispensed; your reticence leads me to believe that the "errors" if they exist at all are truly insignificant.

Like i said i'm not counterpunch's fact checker. If they want to be a real publication they might need to get their own.

In the meantime........garbage in, garbage out.

[Plane]

  I don't consider it a fact that  Imperialists in power in the USA exist.


   This may seem like a safe assumption to you , but I consider it to be an opinion based on assumption.