Author Topic: China Has Divested 97 Percent of Its Holdings in U.S. Treasury Bills  (Read 1918 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Religious Dick

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1153
  • Drunk, drunk, drunk in the gardens and the graves
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
China Has Divested 97 Percent of Its Holdings in U.S. Treasury Bills
Friday, June 03, 2011
By Terence P. Jeffrey

(CNSNews.com) - China has dropped 97 percent of its holdings in U.S. Treasury bills, decreasing its ownership of the short-term U.S. government securities from a peak of $210.4 billion in May 2009 to $5.69 billion in March 2011, the most recent month reported by the U.S. Treasury.

Treasury bills are securities that mature in one year or less that are sold by the U.S. Treasury Department to fund the nation?s debt.

Mainland Chinese holdings of U.S. Treasury bills are reported in column 9 of the Treasury report linked here.

Until October, the Chinese were generally making up for their decreasing holdings in Treasury bills by increasing their holdings of longer-term U.S. Treasury securities. Thus, until October, China?s overall holdings of U.S. debt continued to increase.

Since October, however, China has also started to divest from longer-term U.S. Treasury securities. Thus, as reported by the Treasury Department, China?s ownership of the U.S. national debt has decreased in each of the last five months on record, including November, December, January, February and March. 
Prior to the fall of 2008, acccording to Treasury Department data, Chinese ownership of short-term Treasury bills was modest, standing at only $19.8 billion in August of that year. But when President George W. Bush signed legislation to authorize a $700-billion bailout of the U.S. financial industry in October 2008 and President Barack Obama signed a $787-billion economic stimulus law in February 2009, Chinese ownership of short-term U.S. Treasury bills skyrocketed.

By December 2008, China owned $165.2 billion in U.S. Treasury bills, according to the Treasury Department. By March 2009, Chinese Treasury bill holdings were at $191.1 billion. By May 2009, Chinese holdings of Treasury bills were peaking at $210.4 billion.

However, China?s overall appetite for U.S. debt increased over a longer span than did its appetite for short-term U.S. Treasury bills.

In August 2008, before the bank bailout and the stimulus law, overall Chinese holdings of U.S. debt stood at $573.7 billion. That number continued to escalate past May 2009-- when China started to reduce its holdings in short-term Treasury bills--and ultimately peaked at $1.1753 trillion last October.
As of March 2011, overall Chinese holdings of U.S. debt had decreased to 1.1449 trillion.
Most of the U.S. national debt is made up of publicly marketable securities sold by the Treasury Department and I.O.U.s called ?intragovernmental? bonds that the Treasury has given to so-called government trust funds?such as the Social Security trust funds?when it has spent the trust funds? money on other government expenses.

The publicly marketable segment of the national debt includes Treasury bills, which (as defined by the Treasury) mature in terms of one-year or less; Treasury notes, which mature in terms of 2 to 10 years; Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS), which mature in terms of 5, 10 and 30 years; and Treasury bonds, which mature in terms of 30 years.

At the end of August 2008, before the financial bailout and the stimulus, the publicly marketable segment of the U.S. national debt was 4.88 trillion. Of that, $2.56 trillion was in the intermediate-term Treasury notes, $1.22 trillion was in short-term Treasury bills, $582.8 billion was in long-term Treasury bonds, and $521.3 billion was in TIPS.

At the end of March 2011, by which time the Chinese had dropped their Treasury bill holdings 97 percent from their peak, the publicly marketable segment of the U.S. national debt had almost doubled from August 2008, hitting $9.11 trillion. Of that $9.11 trillion, $5.8 trillion was in intermediate-term Treasury notes, $1.7 trillion was in short-term Treasury bills; $931.5 billion was in long-term Treasury bonds, and $640.7 billion was in TIPS.

Before the end of March 2012, the Treasury must redeem all of the $1.7 trillion in Treasury bills that were extant as of March 2011 and find new or old buyers who will continue to invest in U.S. debt. But, for now, the Chinese at least do not appear to be bullish customers of short-term U.S. debt.

Treasury bills carry lower interest rates than longer-term Treasury notes and bonds, but the longer term notes and bonds are exposed to a greater risk of losing their value to inflation. To the degree that the $1.7 trillion in short-term U.S. Treasury bills extant as of March must be converted into longer-term U.S. Treasury securities, the U.S. government will be forced to pay a higher annual interest rate on the national debt.

As of the close of business on Thursday, the total U.S. debt was $14.34 trillion, according to the Daily Treasury Statement. Of that, approximately $9.74 trillion was debt held by the public and approximately $4.61 trillion was ?intragovernmental? debt.

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/china-has-divested-97-percent-its-holdin
I speak of civil, social man under law, and no other.
-Sir Edmund Burke

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: China Has Divested 97 Percent of Its Holdings in U.S. Treasury Bills
« Reply #1 on: June 04, 2011, 03:39:46 PM »
The interest rate on these this year has ranged from .19 to .36 of 1%.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

BSB

  • Guest
Re: China Has Divested 97 Percent of Its Holdings in U.S. Treasury Bills
« Reply #2 on: June 04, 2011, 05:12:57 PM »
Well, you be sure to let us know when the end of the world is near, Religious Dick.

BSB

Christians4LessGvt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11160
    • View Profile
    • "The Religion Of Peace"
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: China Has Divested 97 Percent of Its Holdings in U.S. Treasury Bills
« Reply #3 on: June 04, 2011, 05:23:26 PM »
hope china uses lots of that money to buy more GOLD!

:)

"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" - Ronald Reagan - June 12, 1987

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: China Has Divested 97 Percent of Its Holdings in U.S. Treasury Bills
« Reply #5 on: June 04, 2011, 11:09:56 PM »
Silver seems to be doing better than gold at the moment.There are more commercial uses for it, too.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Christians4LessGvt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11160
    • View Profile
    • "The Religion Of Peace"
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: China Has Divested 97 Percent of Its Holdings in U.S. Treasury Bills
« Reply #6 on: June 05, 2011, 12:03:38 AM »
Silver seems to be doing better than gold at the moment.There are more commercial uses for it, too.

yeah...
but in case you haven't noticed "commercial uses" are off do to a worldwide near depression!
"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" - Ronald Reagan - June 12, 1987

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: China Has Divested 97 Percent of Its Holdings in U.S. Treasury Bills
« Reply #7 on: June 05, 2011, 01:35:44 AM »
If you buy gold, it is speculation. the same is true of silver. The difference is that there is a greater demand for silver commercially, so the odds slightly favor investing in it. But more than 5% of a portfolio would be overly risky for me.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Christians4LessGvt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11160
    • View Profile
    • "The Religion Of Peace"
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: China Has Divested 97 Percent of Its Holdings in U.S. Treasury Bills
« Reply #8 on: June 05, 2011, 02:19:55 AM »
If you buy gold, it is speculation. the same is true of silver.
The difference is that there is a greater demand for silver commercially,
so the odds slightly favor investing in it.

Most governments around the world dont really agree with that.
And it also can be about what you mean by "invest".
Most people that invest in physical metals dont want silver because of storage problems.
A million dollars of gold can be easily stored....a million dollars of silver starts getting prett bulky.
I am not in any way "anti-silver"....in fact I own both physical and ETF silver positions.
You are correct silver has more robust commerical/industrial use.
And silver long term will continue to rise and rise....
But I see silver as more affected by economic down-turn than gold....
China, India, and many other gvts are buying huge amounts of gold.
Even the Univ of Texas recently purchased a billion dollars in physical gold bullion.

"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" - Ronald Reagan - June 12, 1987

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: China Has Divested 97 Percent of Its Holdings in U.S. Treasury Bills
« Reply #9 on: June 05, 2011, 12:23:28 PM »
Owning gold in teensy little ingots or coins is just stupid, expensive and risky for an individual. Then you have storage, insurance and assay costs.

Probably owning silver and gold in ETF form is the best solution.

The University of Texas is hardly an individual, so they are not a ood example of what an individual should do.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

kimba1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8037
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: China Has Divested 97 Percent of Its Holdings in U.S. Treasury Bills
« Reply #10 on: June 05, 2011, 12:50:15 PM »
ok
last check gold is around over $1500 and in 1992 I got gold at $290. meaning this stuff is very overpriced and fueled totally by speculations. will it go even higher in the next few years? very likely,but it will tank bad. hell in year 2000 gold was at $320 I could buy a gold mine for 35k then.  it`s a gamble but gold hitting $2000 is doable . the real question is what is the magical price which the majority will stop buying gold and start selling. it`s not now but it feels near

p.s. remember for no reason gold effect platinum & silver prices also so buy them is tricky

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: China Has Divested 97 Percent of Its Holdings in U.S. Treasury Bills
« Reply #11 on: June 05, 2011, 01:53:42 PM »
All commodities are volatile, but precious metals are especially so. Gold and to some degree, silver, are driven by fear and greed, and at the moment both are major forces.

Palladium is also driven by the same forces that affect gold, platinum and silver.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Christians4LessGvt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11160
    • View Profile
    • "The Religion Of Peace"
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: China Has Divested 97 Percent of Its Holdings in U.S. Treasury Bills
« Reply #12 on: June 05, 2011, 02:11:26 PM »
Owning gold in teensy little ingots or coins is just stupid, expensive and risky for an individual.

How so?
It has paid off quite well for me.
One man's "stupid" is another man's savy.
"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" - Ronald Reagan - June 12, 1987

Christians4LessGvt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11160
    • View Profile
    • "The Religion Of Peace"
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: China Has Divested 97 Percent of Its Holdings in U.S. Treasury Bills
« Reply #13 on: June 05, 2011, 02:14:40 PM »
Gold and to some degree, silver, are driven by fear and greed, and at the moment both are major forces.

Oh enough of the bullshit demonizations.
Commodities are no more "driven by greed" than most other investment vehicles.
"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" - Ronald Reagan - June 12, 1987

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: China Has Divested 97 Percent of Its Holdings in U.S. Treasury Bills
« Reply #14 on: June 05, 2011, 04:00:13 PM »
Flash!

Your investments are not profitable UNTIL you turn them in to cash. All precious metals are volatile, and the price could plummet,as it has on many occasions in the past. Do not count your chickens while they are still in egg form. It does not seem to me that this is likely soon, but one constant of capitalism are bubbles, booms and busts.

All investments are driven by greed, but consider this: if you invest in a company that produces something, there is the possibility that you have improved something for someone, somewhere.  So greed and fear are the sole motivators, and there is no real possibility of a useful product saving someone time or labor or prolonging their life of anything like that involved.

This is not the case if you invest in gold at, say, $500 and sell it at $1500, or whatever figure. I have a small amount invested in funds that hold gold and silver. I did not say it is a bad idea. It is a rather GOOD idea, actually, to a limited degree.

But to me, insisting on physical gold (or silver or platinum)  is silly, like Scrooge McDuck's money pool, or a garage full survival rations and ammo.

"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."